Cargando…

Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities

Recent calls for improvement in undergraduate education within STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines are hampered by the methods used to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Faculty members at research universities are commonly assessed and promoted mainly on the basis of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dennin, Michael, Schultz, Zachary D., Feig, Andrew, Finkelstein, Noah, Greenhoot, Andrea Follmer, Hildreth, Michael, Leibovich, Adam K., Martin, James D., Moldwin, Mark B., O’Dowd, Diane K., Posey, Lynmarie A., Smith, Tobin L., Miller, Emily R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032
_version_ 1783289673013002240
author Dennin, Michael
Schultz, Zachary D.
Feig, Andrew
Finkelstein, Noah
Greenhoot, Andrea Follmer
Hildreth, Michael
Leibovich, Adam K.
Martin, James D.
Moldwin, Mark B.
O’Dowd, Diane K.
Posey, Lynmarie A.
Smith, Tobin L.
Miller, Emily R.
author_facet Dennin, Michael
Schultz, Zachary D.
Feig, Andrew
Finkelstein, Noah
Greenhoot, Andrea Follmer
Hildreth, Michael
Leibovich, Adam K.
Martin, James D.
Moldwin, Mark B.
O’Dowd, Diane K.
Posey, Lynmarie A.
Smith, Tobin L.
Miller, Emily R.
author_sort Dennin, Michael
collection PubMed
description Recent calls for improvement in undergraduate education within STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines are hampered by the methods used to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Faculty members at research universities are commonly assessed and promoted mainly on the basis of research success. To improve the quality of undergraduate teaching across all disciplines, not only STEM fields, requires creating an environment wherein continuous improvement of teaching is valued, assessed, and rewarded at various stages of a faculty member’s career. This requires consistent application of policies that reflect well-established best practices for evaluating teaching at the department, college, and university levels. Evidence shows most teaching evaluation practices do not reflect stated policies, even when the policies specifically espouse teaching as a value. Thus, alignment of practice to policy is a major barrier to establishing a culture in which teaching is valued. Situated in the context of current national efforts to improve undergraduate STEM education, including the Association of American Universities Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative, this essay discusses four guiding principles for aligning practice with stated priorities in formal policies: 1) enhancing the role of deans and chairs; 2) effectively using the hiring process; 3) improving communication; and 4) improving the understanding of teaching as a scholarly activity. In addition, three specific examples of efforts to improve the practice of evaluating teaching are presented as examples: 1) Three Bucket Model of merit review at the University of California, Irvine; (2) Evaluation of Teaching Rubric, University of Kansas; and (3) Teaching Quality Framework, University of Colorado, Boulder. These examples provide flexible criteria to holistically evaluate and improve the quality of teaching across the diverse institutions comprising modern higher education.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5749974
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57499742018-01-03 Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities Dennin, Michael Schultz, Zachary D. Feig, Andrew Finkelstein, Noah Greenhoot, Andrea Follmer Hildreth, Michael Leibovich, Adam K. Martin, James D. Moldwin, Mark B. O’Dowd, Diane K. Posey, Lynmarie A. Smith, Tobin L. Miller, Emily R. CBE Life Sci Educ Essay Recent calls for improvement in undergraduate education within STEM (science, technology, engineering, and mathematics) disciplines are hampered by the methods used to evaluate teaching effectiveness. Faculty members at research universities are commonly assessed and promoted mainly on the basis of research success. To improve the quality of undergraduate teaching across all disciplines, not only STEM fields, requires creating an environment wherein continuous improvement of teaching is valued, assessed, and rewarded at various stages of a faculty member’s career. This requires consistent application of policies that reflect well-established best practices for evaluating teaching at the department, college, and university levels. Evidence shows most teaching evaluation practices do not reflect stated policies, even when the policies specifically espouse teaching as a value. Thus, alignment of practice to policy is a major barrier to establishing a culture in which teaching is valued. Situated in the context of current national efforts to improve undergraduate STEM education, including the Association of American Universities Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative, this essay discusses four guiding principles for aligning practice with stated priorities in formal policies: 1) enhancing the role of deans and chairs; 2) effectively using the hiring process; 3) improving communication; and 4) improving the understanding of teaching as a scholarly activity. In addition, three specific examples of efforts to improve the practice of evaluating teaching are presented as examples: 1) Three Bucket Model of merit review at the University of California, Irvine; (2) Evaluation of Teaching Rubric, University of Kansas; and (3) Teaching Quality Framework, University of Colorado, Boulder. These examples provide flexible criteria to holistically evaluate and improve the quality of teaching across the diverse institutions comprising modern higher education. American Society for Cell Biology 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5749974/ /pubmed/29196430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032 Text en © 2017 M. Dennin et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2017 The American Society for Cell Biology. This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0). “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology.
spellingShingle Essay
Dennin, Michael
Schultz, Zachary D.
Feig, Andrew
Finkelstein, Noah
Greenhoot, Andrea Follmer
Hildreth, Michael
Leibovich, Adam K.
Martin, James D.
Moldwin, Mark B.
O’Dowd, Diane K.
Posey, Lynmarie A.
Smith, Tobin L.
Miller, Emily R.
Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities
title Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities
title_full Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities
title_fullStr Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities
title_full_unstemmed Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities
title_short Aligning Practice to Policies: Changing the Culture to Recognize and Reward Teaching at Research Universities
title_sort aligning practice to policies: changing the culture to recognize and reward teaching at research universities
topic Essay
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5749974/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29196430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-02-0032
work_keys_str_mv AT denninmichael aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT schultzzacharyd aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT feigandrew aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT finkelsteinnoah aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT greenhootandreafollmer aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT hildrethmichael aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT leibovichadamk aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT martinjamesd aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT moldwinmarkb aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT odowddianek aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT poseylynmariea aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT smithtobinl aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities
AT milleremilyr aligningpracticetopolicieschangingtheculturetorecognizeandrewardteachingatresearchuniversities