Cargando…

Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection

Both T(H)2-dependent helminth killing and suppression of the T(H)2 effector response have been attributed to macrophages (MΦ) activated by IL-4 (M(IL-4)). To investigate how M(IL-4) contribute to diverse infection outcomes, the MΦ compartment of susceptible BALB/c mice and more resistant C57BL/6 mic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Campbell, Sharon M, Knipper, Johanna A, Ruckerl, Dominik, Finlay, Conor M, Logan, Nicola, Minutti, Carlos M, Mack, Matthias, Jenkins, Stephen J, Taylor, Matthew D, Allen, Judith E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299998
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30947
_version_ 1783290376568700928
author Campbell, Sharon M
Knipper, Johanna A
Ruckerl, Dominik
Finlay, Conor M
Logan, Nicola
Minutti, Carlos M
Mack, Matthias
Jenkins, Stephen J
Taylor, Matthew D
Allen, Judith E
author_facet Campbell, Sharon M
Knipper, Johanna A
Ruckerl, Dominik
Finlay, Conor M
Logan, Nicola
Minutti, Carlos M
Mack, Matthias
Jenkins, Stephen J
Taylor, Matthew D
Allen, Judith E
author_sort Campbell, Sharon M
collection PubMed
description Both T(H)2-dependent helminth killing and suppression of the T(H)2 effector response have been attributed to macrophages (MΦ) activated by IL-4 (M(IL-4)). To investigate how M(IL-4) contribute to diverse infection outcomes, the MΦ compartment of susceptible BALB/c mice and more resistant C57BL/6 mice was profiled during infection of the pleural cavity with the filarial nematode, Litomosoides sigmodontis. C57BL/6 mice exhibited a profoundly expanded resident MΦ (resMΦ) population, which was gradually replenished from the bone marrow in an age-dependent manner. Infection status did not alter the bone-marrow derived contribution to the resMΦ population, confirming local proliferation as the driver of resMΦ expansion. Significantly less resMΦ expansion was observed in the susceptible BALB/c strain, which instead exhibited an influx of monocytes that assumed an immunosuppressive PD-L2(+) phenotype. Inhibition of monocyte recruitment enhanced nematode killing. Thus, the balance of monocytic vs. resident M(IL-4) numbers varies between inbred mouse strains and impacts infection outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5754202
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57542022018-01-05 Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection Campbell, Sharon M Knipper, Johanna A Ruckerl, Dominik Finlay, Conor M Logan, Nicola Minutti, Carlos M Mack, Matthias Jenkins, Stephen J Taylor, Matthew D Allen, Judith E eLife Immunology and Inflammation Both T(H)2-dependent helminth killing and suppression of the T(H)2 effector response have been attributed to macrophages (MΦ) activated by IL-4 (M(IL-4)). To investigate how M(IL-4) contribute to diverse infection outcomes, the MΦ compartment of susceptible BALB/c mice and more resistant C57BL/6 mice was profiled during infection of the pleural cavity with the filarial nematode, Litomosoides sigmodontis. C57BL/6 mice exhibited a profoundly expanded resident MΦ (resMΦ) population, which was gradually replenished from the bone marrow in an age-dependent manner. Infection status did not alter the bone-marrow derived contribution to the resMΦ population, confirming local proliferation as the driver of resMΦ expansion. Significantly less resMΦ expansion was observed in the susceptible BALB/c strain, which instead exhibited an influx of monocytes that assumed an immunosuppressive PD-L2(+) phenotype. Inhibition of monocyte recruitment enhanced nematode killing. Thus, the balance of monocytic vs. resident M(IL-4) numbers varies between inbred mouse strains and impacts infection outcome. eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5754202/ /pubmed/29299998 http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30947 Text en © 2017, Campbell et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Immunology and Inflammation
Campbell, Sharon M
Knipper, Johanna A
Ruckerl, Dominik
Finlay, Conor M
Logan, Nicola
Minutti, Carlos M
Mack, Matthias
Jenkins, Stephen J
Taylor, Matthew D
Allen, Judith E
Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection
title Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection
title_full Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection
title_fullStr Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection
title_full_unstemmed Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection
title_short Myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection
title_sort myeloid cell recruitment versus local proliferation differentiates susceptibility from resistance to filarial infection
topic Immunology and Inflammation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5754202/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29299998
http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.30947
work_keys_str_mv AT campbellsharonm myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT knipperjohannaa myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT ruckerldominik myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT finlayconorm myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT logannicola myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT minutticarlosm myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT mackmatthias myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT jenkinsstephenj myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT taylormatthewd myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection
AT allenjudithe myeloidcellrecruitmentversuslocalproliferationdifferentiatessusceptibilityfromresistancetofilarialinfection