Cargando…

Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions

Prior research has shown that infants learn statistical regularities in action sequences better than they learn non-action event sequences. This is consistent with current theories claiming that the same mechanism guides action observation and action execution. The current eye-tracking study tested...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Monroy, Claire, Gerson, Sarah, Hunnius, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02174
_version_ 1783293127350550528
author Monroy, Claire
Gerson, Sarah
Hunnius, Sabine
author_facet Monroy, Claire
Gerson, Sarah
Hunnius, Sabine
author_sort Monroy, Claire
collection PubMed
description Prior research has shown that infants learn statistical regularities in action sequences better than they learn non-action event sequences. This is consistent with current theories claiming that the same mechanism guides action observation and action execution. The current eye-tracking study tested the prediction, based on these theories, that infants’ ability to learn statistical regularities in action sequences is modulated by their own motor abilities. Eight- to eleven-month-old infants observed an action sequence containing two deterministic action pairs (i.e., action A always followed by action B) embedded within an otherwise random sequence. One pair was performed with a whole-hand grasp. The second pair was performed with a pincer grasp, a fine motor skill that emerges around 9 months of age. Infants were then categorized into groups according to which grasp was dominant in their motor repertoire. Predictive looks to correct upcoming actions during the deterministic pairs were analyzed to measure whether infants learned and anticipated the sequence regularities. Findings indicate that infants learned the statistical regularities: across motor groups, they made more correct than incorrect predictive fixations to upcoming actions. Overall, learning was not significantly modulated by their dominant grasping abilities. However, infants with a dominant pincer grasp showed an earlier increase in correct predictions for the pincer grasp pair and not the whole-hand grasp. Likewise, infants with a dominant whole-hand grasp showed an early increase in correct predictions for the pair performed with a whole-hand grasp, and not the pincer grasp. Together, these findings suggest that infants’ ability to learn action sequences is facilitated when the observed action matches their own action repertoire. However, findings cannot be explained entirely by motor accounts, as infants also learned the actions less congruent with their own abilities. Findings are discussed in terms of the interplay between the motor system and additional non-motor resources during the acquisition of new motor skills in infancy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5770741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-57707412018-01-26 Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions Monroy, Claire Gerson, Sarah Hunnius, Sabine Front Psychol Psychology Prior research has shown that infants learn statistical regularities in action sequences better than they learn non-action event sequences. This is consistent with current theories claiming that the same mechanism guides action observation and action execution. The current eye-tracking study tested the prediction, based on these theories, that infants’ ability to learn statistical regularities in action sequences is modulated by their own motor abilities. Eight- to eleven-month-old infants observed an action sequence containing two deterministic action pairs (i.e., action A always followed by action B) embedded within an otherwise random sequence. One pair was performed with a whole-hand grasp. The second pair was performed with a pincer grasp, a fine motor skill that emerges around 9 months of age. Infants were then categorized into groups according to which grasp was dominant in their motor repertoire. Predictive looks to correct upcoming actions during the deterministic pairs were analyzed to measure whether infants learned and anticipated the sequence regularities. Findings indicate that infants learned the statistical regularities: across motor groups, they made more correct than incorrect predictive fixations to upcoming actions. Overall, learning was not significantly modulated by their dominant grasping abilities. However, infants with a dominant pincer grasp showed an earlier increase in correct predictions for the pincer grasp pair and not the whole-hand grasp. Likewise, infants with a dominant whole-hand grasp showed an early increase in correct predictions for the pair performed with a whole-hand grasp, and not the pincer grasp. Together, these findings suggest that infants’ ability to learn action sequences is facilitated when the observed action matches their own action repertoire. However, findings cannot be explained entirely by motor accounts, as infants also learned the actions less congruent with their own abilities. Findings are discussed in terms of the interplay between the motor system and additional non-motor resources during the acquisition of new motor skills in infancy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-12-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5770741/ /pubmed/29375414 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02174 Text en Copyright © 2017 Monroy, Gerson and Hunnius. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Monroy, Claire
Gerson, Sarah
Hunnius, Sabine
Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions
title Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions
title_full Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions
title_fullStr Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions
title_full_unstemmed Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions
title_short Infants’ Motor Proficiency and Statistical Learning for Actions
title_sort infants’ motor proficiency and statistical learning for actions
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5770741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29375414
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02174
work_keys_str_mv AT monroyclaire infantsmotorproficiencyandstatisticallearningforactions
AT gersonsarah infantsmotorproficiencyandstatisticallearningforactions
AT hunniussabine infantsmotorproficiencyandstatisticallearningforactions