Cargando…
Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t
Lupus is a complex heterogeneous disease characterised by autoantibody production and immune complex deposition followed by damage to target tissues. Animal models of human diseases are an invaluable tool for defining pathogenic mechanisms and testing of novel therapeutic agents. There are perhaps m...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2016-000199 |
_version_ | 1783295847885176832 |
---|---|
author | Richard, Mara Lennard Gilkeson, Gary |
author_facet | Richard, Mara Lennard Gilkeson, Gary |
author_sort | Richard, Mara Lennard |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lupus is a complex heterogeneous disease characterised by autoantibody production and immune complex deposition followed by damage to target tissues. Animal models of human diseases are an invaluable tool for defining pathogenic mechanisms and testing of novel therapeutic agents. There are perhaps more applicable murine models of lupus than any other human disease. There are spontaneous models of lupus, inducible models of lupus, transgenic-induced lupus, gene knockout induced lupus and humanised mouse models of lupus. These mouse models of lupus have contributed significantly to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of lupus and served as valuable preclinical models for proof of concept for new therapies. Despite their utility, mouse models of lupus have their distinct limitations. Although similar, mouse and human immune systems are different and thus one cannot assume a mechanism for disease in one is translatable to the other. Efficacy and toxicity of compounds can vary significantly between humans and mice, also limiting direct translation. Finally, the heterogeneous aspects of human lupus, both in clinical presentation, underlying pathogenesis and genetics, are not completely represented in current mouse models. Thus, proving a therapy or mechanism of disease in one mouse model is similar to proving a mechanism/therapy in a limited subset of human lupus. These limitations, however, do not marginalise the importance of animal models nor the significant contributions they have made to our understanding of lupus. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5786947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-57869472018-01-31 Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t Richard, Mara Lennard Gilkeson, Gary Lupus Sci Med Review Lupus is a complex heterogeneous disease characterised by autoantibody production and immune complex deposition followed by damage to target tissues. Animal models of human diseases are an invaluable tool for defining pathogenic mechanisms and testing of novel therapeutic agents. There are perhaps more applicable murine models of lupus than any other human disease. There are spontaneous models of lupus, inducible models of lupus, transgenic-induced lupus, gene knockout induced lupus and humanised mouse models of lupus. These mouse models of lupus have contributed significantly to our knowledge of the pathogenesis of lupus and served as valuable preclinical models for proof of concept for new therapies. Despite their utility, mouse models of lupus have their distinct limitations. Although similar, mouse and human immune systems are different and thus one cannot assume a mechanism for disease in one is translatable to the other. Efficacy and toxicity of compounds can vary significantly between humans and mice, also limiting direct translation. Finally, the heterogeneous aspects of human lupus, both in clinical presentation, underlying pathogenesis and genetics, are not completely represented in current mouse models. Thus, proving a therapy or mechanism of disease in one mouse model is similar to proving a mechanism/therapy in a limited subset of human lupus. These limitations, however, do not marginalise the importance of animal models nor the significant contributions they have made to our understanding of lupus. BMJ Publishing Group 2018-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5786947/ /pubmed/29387435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2016-000199 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Review Richard, Mara Lennard Gilkeson, Gary Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t |
title | Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t |
title_full | Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t |
title_fullStr | Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t |
title_full_unstemmed | Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t |
title_short | Mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t |
title_sort | mouse models of lupus: what they tell us and what they don’t |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5786947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29387435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/lupus-2016-000199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richardmaralennard mousemodelsoflupuswhattheytellusandwhattheydont AT gilkesongary mousemodelsoflupuswhattheytellusandwhattheydont |