Cargando…

Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Placement Enhancement Program (CPEP) is a simulation course for medical students learning the core topics of cardiovascular and respiratory medicine, incorporating patient safety and professionalism teaching and based on adult learning principles and proven educational theor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cunningham, Neil J., O’Brien, Robert, Weiland, Tracey, van Dijk, Julian, Dilley, Stuart
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z
_version_ 1783299096089460736
author Cunningham, Neil J.
O’Brien, Robert
Weiland, Tracey
van Dijk, Julian
Dilley, Stuart
author_facet Cunningham, Neil J.
O’Brien, Robert
Weiland, Tracey
van Dijk, Julian
Dilley, Stuart
author_sort Cunningham, Neil J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Clinical Placement Enhancement Program (CPEP) is a simulation course for medical students learning the core topics of cardiovascular and respiratory medicine, incorporating patient safety and professionalism teaching and based on adult learning principles and proven educational theory. The aims of this study are to assess whether the CPEP delivered at the beginning of a clinical rotation would result in competency outcomes that are at least equivalent to those achieved through a standard 6-week programme and whether this programme would increase student confidence levels in assessing and managing patients with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. METHODS: This was a pseudo-randomised control trial between two groups of medical students from one clinical school. The intervention group participated in CPEP, a 4-day immersive simulation course, in the first week of their cardiac and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The control group participants attended the normal programme of the 6-week cardiovascular and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The programme and student competence was assessed using Observed Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-reported confidence surveys. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OSCE scoring between the intervention group (examined in week one of their clinical rotation following CPEP) and the control group (examined at the end of their full clinical rotation). Students exposed to CPEP started their clinical rotation with confidence levels similar to those reported by the control group at the end of their rotation. Confidence levels of CPEP students were higher at the end of the rotation compared to those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on OSCE results, immersion into a 4-day simulation-based teaching programme at the start of a clinical rotation resulted in skill competency levels that were equivalent to those obtained after a full clinical rotation of 6 weeks. CPEP improved students’ confidence levels in the assessment and management of patients presenting with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. Simulation utilised in courses such as CPEP has the potential to enhance the overall learning experience in medical school clinical rotations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806281
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58062812018-02-15 Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial Cunningham, Neil J. O’Brien, Robert Weiland, Tracey van Dijk, Julian Dilley, Stuart Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: The Clinical Placement Enhancement Program (CPEP) is a simulation course for medical students learning the core topics of cardiovascular and respiratory medicine, incorporating patient safety and professionalism teaching and based on adult learning principles and proven educational theory. The aims of this study are to assess whether the CPEP delivered at the beginning of a clinical rotation would result in competency outcomes that are at least equivalent to those achieved through a standard 6-week programme and whether this programme would increase student confidence levels in assessing and managing patients with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. METHODS: This was a pseudo-randomised control trial between two groups of medical students from one clinical school. The intervention group participated in CPEP, a 4-day immersive simulation course, in the first week of their cardiac and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The control group participants attended the normal programme of the 6-week cardiovascular and respiratory medicine clinical rotation. The programme and student competence was assessed using Observed Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) and self-reported confidence surveys. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in OSCE scoring between the intervention group (examined in week one of their clinical rotation following CPEP) and the control group (examined at the end of their full clinical rotation). Students exposed to CPEP started their clinical rotation with confidence levels similar to those reported by the control group at the end of their rotation. Confidence levels of CPEP students were higher at the end of the rotation compared to those of the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Based on OSCE results, immersion into a 4-day simulation-based teaching programme at the start of a clinical rotation resulted in skill competency levels that were equivalent to those obtained after a full clinical rotation of 6 weeks. CPEP improved students’ confidence levels in the assessment and management of patients presenting with cardiovascular and respiratory conditions. Simulation utilised in courses such as CPEP has the potential to enhance the overall learning experience in medical school clinical rotations. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC5806281/ /pubmed/29449984 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z Text en © Cunningham et al 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Cunningham, Neil J.
O’Brien, Robert
Weiland, Tracey
van Dijk, Julian
Dilley, Stuart
Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial
title Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial
title_full Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial
title_fullStr Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial
title_short Intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial
title_sort intensive simulation versus control in the assessment of time to skill competency and confidence of medical students to assess and manage cardiovascular and respiratory conditions—a pseudo-randomised trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806281/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29449984
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0016-z
work_keys_str_mv AT cunninghamneilj intensivesimulationversuscontrolintheassessmentoftimetoskillcompetencyandconfidenceofmedicalstudentstoassessandmanagecardiovascularandrespiratoryconditionsapseudorandomisedtrial
AT obrienrobert intensivesimulationversuscontrolintheassessmentoftimetoskillcompetencyandconfidenceofmedicalstudentstoassessandmanagecardiovascularandrespiratoryconditionsapseudorandomisedtrial
AT weilandtracey intensivesimulationversuscontrolintheassessmentoftimetoskillcompetencyandconfidenceofmedicalstudentstoassessandmanagecardiovascularandrespiratoryconditionsapseudorandomisedtrial
AT vandijkjulian intensivesimulationversuscontrolintheassessmentoftimetoskillcompetencyandconfidenceofmedicalstudentstoassessandmanagecardiovascularandrespiratoryconditionsapseudorandomisedtrial
AT dilleystuart intensivesimulationversuscontrolintheassessmentoftimetoskillcompetencyandconfidenceofmedicalstudentstoassessandmanagecardiovascularandrespiratoryconditionsapseudorandomisedtrial