Cargando…

Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: A scoping review was conducted in order to map and determine the gaps in literature on the impact of simulation as an educational approach to improve mental health care outcomes. As it became apparent that no literature existed on this topic, the study aimed to examine the educational im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williams, Brett, Reddy, Priya, Marshall, Stuart, Beovich, Bronwyn, McKarney, Lesley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0035-9
_version_ 1783299143999946752
author Williams, Brett
Reddy, Priya
Marshall, Stuart
Beovich, Bronwyn
McKarney, Lesley
author_facet Williams, Brett
Reddy, Priya
Marshall, Stuart
Beovich, Bronwyn
McKarney, Lesley
author_sort Williams, Brett
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A scoping review was conducted in order to map and determine the gaps in literature on the impact of simulation as an educational approach to improve mental health care outcomes. As it became apparent that no literature existed on this topic, the study aimed to examine the educational impact of simulation on mental health education. METHODS: An established five-stage scoping methodology was used: (1) identification of the research question, (2) identification of relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data and (5) collation, summarising and reporting of results. CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases were searched. These databases were deemed to represent a majority of the literature while accommodating for the particular search strategy used for this review. Websites that provide grey literature were also searched for articles of relevance. RESULTS: A total of 48 articles were included in this review, with a considerable portion of studies conducted in the USA and UK. Others were conducted in an array of locations including Australia, Canada, Iran and Taiwan. Of the included articles, seven groups of simulation methods (including standardised patients, virtual reality and manikins as patients) were evident, with standardised patients being most prominent. CONCLUSIONS: Literature is lacking to evidence the benefit of simulation on mental health patient outcomes. However, the available literature suggests a variety of simulation-based education, and training methods are currently being used within mental healthcare education. The findings do suggest some methods of simulation, such as the use of standardised patients, are more commonly used in education and have been deemed as effective to assist in mental health education. As no article specifically examining the mental health outcomes of patients treated by health professionals taught by simulation was identified, the educational outcomes outlined in this paper may be used to inform further research, incorporating mental health patient outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0035-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5806484
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58064842018-02-15 Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review Williams, Brett Reddy, Priya Marshall, Stuart Beovich, Bronwyn McKarney, Lesley Adv Simul (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: A scoping review was conducted in order to map and determine the gaps in literature on the impact of simulation as an educational approach to improve mental health care outcomes. As it became apparent that no literature existed on this topic, the study aimed to examine the educational impact of simulation on mental health education. METHODS: An established five-stage scoping methodology was used: (1) identification of the research question, (2) identification of relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data and (5) collation, summarising and reporting of results. CINAHL, ProQuest, PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsychINFO databases were searched. These databases were deemed to represent a majority of the literature while accommodating for the particular search strategy used for this review. Websites that provide grey literature were also searched for articles of relevance. RESULTS: A total of 48 articles were included in this review, with a considerable portion of studies conducted in the USA and UK. Others were conducted in an array of locations including Australia, Canada, Iran and Taiwan. Of the included articles, seven groups of simulation methods (including standardised patients, virtual reality and manikins as patients) were evident, with standardised patients being most prominent. CONCLUSIONS: Literature is lacking to evidence the benefit of simulation on mental health patient outcomes. However, the available literature suggests a variety of simulation-based education, and training methods are currently being used within mental healthcare education. The findings do suggest some methods of simulation, such as the use of standardised patients, are more commonly used in education and have been deemed as effective to assist in mental health education. As no article specifically examining the mental health outcomes of patients treated by health professionals taught by simulation was identified, the educational outcomes outlined in this paper may be used to inform further research, incorporating mental health patient outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41077-016-0035-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5806484/ /pubmed/29450003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0035-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Williams, Brett
Reddy, Priya
Marshall, Stuart
Beovich, Bronwyn
McKarney, Lesley
Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review
title Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review
title_full Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review
title_fullStr Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review
title_short Simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review
title_sort simulation and mental health outcomes: a scoping review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5806484/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29450003
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41077-016-0035-9
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsbrett simulationandmentalhealthoutcomesascopingreview
AT reddypriya simulationandmentalhealthoutcomesascopingreview
AT marshallstuart simulationandmentalhealthoutcomesascopingreview
AT beovichbronwyn simulationandmentalhealthoutcomesascopingreview
AT mckarneylesley simulationandmentalhealthoutcomesascopingreview