Cargando…
Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps
Food allergies are recognized as a global health concern. In order to protect allergic consumers from severe symptoms, allergenic risk assessment for well‐known foods and foods containing genetically modified ingredients is installed. However, population is steadily growing and there is a rising nee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28925060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201700278 |
_version_ | 1783300417566801920 |
---|---|
author | Mazzucchelli, Gabriel Holzhauser, Thomas Cirkovic Velickovic, Tanja Diaz‐Perales, Araceli Molina, Elena Roncada, Paola Rodrigues, Pedro Verhoeckx, Kitty Hoffmann‐Sommergruber, Karin |
author_facet | Mazzucchelli, Gabriel Holzhauser, Thomas Cirkovic Velickovic, Tanja Diaz‐Perales, Araceli Molina, Elena Roncada, Paola Rodrigues, Pedro Verhoeckx, Kitty Hoffmann‐Sommergruber, Karin |
author_sort | Mazzucchelli, Gabriel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Food allergies are recognized as a global health concern. In order to protect allergic consumers from severe symptoms, allergenic risk assessment for well‐known foods and foods containing genetically modified ingredients is installed. However, population is steadily growing and there is a rising need to provide adequate protein‐based foods, including novel sources, not yet used for human consumption. In this context safety issues such as a potential increased allergenic risk need to be assessed before marketing novel food sources. Therefore, the established allergenic risk assessment for genetically modified organisms needs to be re‐evaluated for its applicability for risk assessment of novel food proteins. Two different scenarios of allergic sensitization have to be assessed. The first scenario is the presence of already known allergenic structures in novel foods. For this, a comparative assessment can be performed and the range of cross‐reactivity can be explored, while in the second scenario allergic reactions are observed toward so far novel allergenic structures and no reference material is available. This review summarizes the current analytical methods for allergenic risk assessment, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each method and discussing the gaps in this assessment that need to be addressed in the near future. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5814866 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58148662018-02-27 Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps Mazzucchelli, Gabriel Holzhauser, Thomas Cirkovic Velickovic, Tanja Diaz‐Perales, Araceli Molina, Elena Roncada, Paola Rodrigues, Pedro Verhoeckx, Kitty Hoffmann‐Sommergruber, Karin Mol Nutr Food Res Reviews Food allergies are recognized as a global health concern. In order to protect allergic consumers from severe symptoms, allergenic risk assessment for well‐known foods and foods containing genetically modified ingredients is installed. However, population is steadily growing and there is a rising need to provide adequate protein‐based foods, including novel sources, not yet used for human consumption. In this context safety issues such as a potential increased allergenic risk need to be assessed before marketing novel food sources. Therefore, the established allergenic risk assessment for genetically modified organisms needs to be re‐evaluated for its applicability for risk assessment of novel food proteins. Two different scenarios of allergic sensitization have to be assessed. The first scenario is the presence of already known allergenic structures in novel foods. For this, a comparative assessment can be performed and the range of cross‐reactivity can be explored, while in the second scenario allergic reactions are observed toward so far novel allergenic structures and no reference material is available. This review summarizes the current analytical methods for allergenic risk assessment, highlighting the strengths and limitations of each method and discussing the gaps in this assessment that need to be addressed in the near future. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-12-11 2018-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5814866/ /pubmed/28925060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201700278 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Reviews Mazzucchelli, Gabriel Holzhauser, Thomas Cirkovic Velickovic, Tanja Diaz‐Perales, Araceli Molina, Elena Roncada, Paola Rodrigues, Pedro Verhoeckx, Kitty Hoffmann‐Sommergruber, Karin Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps |
title | Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps |
title_full | Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps |
title_fullStr | Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps |
title_full_unstemmed | Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps |
title_short | Current (Food) Allergenic Risk Assessment: Is It Fit for Novel Foods? Status Quo and Identification of Gaps |
title_sort | current (food) allergenic risk assessment: is it fit for novel foods? status quo and identification of gaps |
topic | Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5814866/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28925060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201700278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazzucchelligabriel currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT holzhauserthomas currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT cirkovicvelickovictanja currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT diazperalesaraceli currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT molinaelena currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT roncadapaola currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT rodriguespedro currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT verhoeckxkitty currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps AT hoffmannsommergruberkarin currentfoodallergenicriskassessmentisitfitfornovelfoodsstatusquoandidentificationofgaps |