Cargando…

The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Despite family meetings being widely used to facilitate discussion among patients, families, and clinicians in palliative care, there is limited evidence to support their use. This study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of Patient-Centred Family Meetings in specialist inp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cahill, Philippa J., Sanderson, Christine R., Lobb, Elizabeth A., Phillips, Jane L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0225-9
_version_ 1783301153994309632
author Cahill, Philippa J.
Sanderson, Christine R.
Lobb, Elizabeth A.
Phillips, Jane L.
author_facet Cahill, Philippa J.
Sanderson, Christine R.
Lobb, Elizabeth A.
Phillips, Jane L.
author_sort Cahill, Philippa J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Despite family meetings being widely used to facilitate discussion among patients, families, and clinicians in palliative care, there is limited evidence to support their use. This study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of Patient-Centred Family Meetings in specialist inpatient palliative care units for patients, families, and clinicians and determine the suitability and feasibility of validated outcome measures from the patient and family perspectives. METHODS: The study is a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design with pre-planned Patient-Centred Family Meetings at the intervention site. The patient will set the meeting agenda a priori allowing an opportunity for their issues to be prioritised and addressed. At the control site, usual care will be maintained which may include a family meeting. Each site will recruit 20 dyads comprising a terminally ill inpatient and their nominated family member. Pre- and post-test administration of the Distress Thermometer, QUAL-EC, QUAL-E, and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 will assess patient and family distress and satisfaction with quality of life. Patient, family, and clinician interviews post-meeting will provide insights into the meeting feasibility and outcome measures. Recruitment percentages and outcome measure completion will also inform feasibility. Descriptive statistics will summarise pre- and post-meeting data generated by the outcome measures. SPSS will analyse the quantitative data. Grounded theory will guide the qualitative data analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether planned Patient-Centred Family Meetings are feasible and acceptable and assess the suitability and feasibility of the outcome measures. It will inform a future phase III randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001083482 on 11 August 2016
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5819159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58191592018-02-23 The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study Cahill, Philippa J. Sanderson, Christine R. Lobb, Elizabeth A. Phillips, Jane L. Pilot Feasibility Stud Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Despite family meetings being widely used to facilitate discussion among patients, families, and clinicians in palliative care, there is limited evidence to support their use. This study aims to assess the acceptability and feasibility of Patient-Centred Family Meetings in specialist inpatient palliative care units for patients, families, and clinicians and determine the suitability and feasibility of validated outcome measures from the patient and family perspectives. METHODS: The study is a mixed-methods quasi-experimental design with pre-planned Patient-Centred Family Meetings at the intervention site. The patient will set the meeting agenda a priori allowing an opportunity for their issues to be prioritised and addressed. At the control site, usual care will be maintained which may include a family meeting. Each site will recruit 20 dyads comprising a terminally ill inpatient and their nominated family member. Pre- and post-test administration of the Distress Thermometer, QUAL-EC, QUAL-E, and Patient Health Questionnaire-4 will assess patient and family distress and satisfaction with quality of life. Patient, family, and clinician interviews post-meeting will provide insights into the meeting feasibility and outcome measures. Recruitment percentages and outcome measure completion will also inform feasibility. Descriptive statistics will summarise pre- and post-meeting data generated by the outcome measures. SPSS will analyse the quantitative data. Grounded theory will guide the qualitative data analysis. DISCUSSION: This study will determine whether planned Patient-Centred Family Meetings are feasible and acceptable and assess the suitability and feasibility of the outcome measures. It will inform a future phase III randomised controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616001083482 on 11 August 2016 BioMed Central 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5819159/ /pubmed/29479471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0225-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Cahill, Philippa J.
Sanderson, Christine R.
Lobb, Elizabeth A.
Phillips, Jane L.
The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study
title The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study
title_full The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study
title_fullStr The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study
title_short The VOICE Study: Valuing Opinions, Individual Communication and Experience: building the evidence base for undertaking Patient-Centred Family Meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study
title_sort voice study: valuing opinions, individual communication and experience: building the evidence base for undertaking patient-centred family meetings in palliative care - a mixed methods study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29479471
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-017-0225-9
work_keys_str_mv AT cahillphilippaj thevoicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy
AT sandersonchristiner thevoicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy
AT lobbelizabetha thevoicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy
AT phillipsjanel thevoicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy
AT cahillphilippaj voicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy
AT sandersonchristiner voicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy
AT lobbelizabetha voicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy
AT phillipsjanel voicestudyvaluingopinionsindividualcommunicationandexperiencebuildingtheevidencebaseforundertakingpatientcentredfamilymeetingsinpalliativecareamixedmethodsstudy