Cargando…

The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol

BACKGROUND: A desire to die (DD) is frequent in palliative care (PC). However, uncertainty remains as to the appropriate therapeutic response. (Proactive) discussion of DD is not usually part of standard care. To support health practitioners' (HPs) reactions to a patient’s DD, a training progra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kremeike, Kerstin, Galushko, Maren, Frerich, Gerrit, Romotzky, Vanessa, Hamacher, Stefanie, Rodin, Gary, Pfaff, Holger, Voltz, Raymond
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0279-3
_version_ 1783301186934276096
author Kremeike, Kerstin
Galushko, Maren
Frerich, Gerrit
Romotzky, Vanessa
Hamacher, Stefanie
Rodin, Gary
Pfaff, Holger
Voltz, Raymond
author_facet Kremeike, Kerstin
Galushko, Maren
Frerich, Gerrit
Romotzky, Vanessa
Hamacher, Stefanie
Rodin, Gary
Pfaff, Holger
Voltz, Raymond
author_sort Kremeike, Kerstin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A desire to die (DD) is frequent in palliative care (PC). However, uncertainty remains as to the appropriate therapeutic response. (Proactive) discussion of DD is not usually part of standard care. To support health practitioners' (HPs) reactions to a patient’s DD, a training program has been developed, piloted and evaluated. Within this framework, a first draft of a semi-structured clinical interview schedule with prompts (CISP) has been developed, including recommendations for action to support HPs’ self-confidence. The aim of this study is the further development of the CISP to support routine exploration of death and dying distress and proactive addressing of a DD. METHODS: This observatory, prospective health services study comprises a three step study design: 1. Revision of the CISP and consensus finding based on semi-structured interviews with patients and a Delphi process with (inter-)national experts, patient representatives and relatives; 2. Increasing confidence in HPs through a 2 day-training program using the consented CISP; 3. A formative quantitative evaluation of conversations between HPs and patients (300 palliative patients at three time points) and a qualitative evaluation based on interview triads of patients, relatives and HPs. The evaluation of conversations will include patient-oriented outcomes, including perceived relationships with HPs and death and dying distress. We will also consider aspects of social inequality and gender. DISCUSSION: The intervention can provide a framework for open discussion of DD and a basis for enhancing a trustful HP-patient relationship in which such difficult topics can be addressed. The benefits of this study will include (a) the creation of the first consented semi-structured approach to identify and address DD and to respond therapeutically, (b) the multi-professional enhancement of confidence in dealing with patients’ DD and an intervention that can flexibly be integrated into other training and education programs and (c) an evaluation of effects of this intervention on patients, relatives and HPs, with attention to social inequality and gender. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012988; registration date: 27.9.2017) and in the Health Services Research Database (VfD_DEDIPOM_17_003889; registration date: 14.9.2017).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5819295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58192952018-02-21 The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol Kremeike, Kerstin Galushko, Maren Frerich, Gerrit Romotzky, Vanessa Hamacher, Stefanie Rodin, Gary Pfaff, Holger Voltz, Raymond BMC Palliat Care Study Protocol BACKGROUND: A desire to die (DD) is frequent in palliative care (PC). However, uncertainty remains as to the appropriate therapeutic response. (Proactive) discussion of DD is not usually part of standard care. To support health practitioners' (HPs) reactions to a patient’s DD, a training program has been developed, piloted and evaluated. Within this framework, a first draft of a semi-structured clinical interview schedule with prompts (CISP) has been developed, including recommendations for action to support HPs’ self-confidence. The aim of this study is the further development of the CISP to support routine exploration of death and dying distress and proactive addressing of a DD. METHODS: This observatory, prospective health services study comprises a three step study design: 1. Revision of the CISP and consensus finding based on semi-structured interviews with patients and a Delphi process with (inter-)national experts, patient representatives and relatives; 2. Increasing confidence in HPs through a 2 day-training program using the consented CISP; 3. A formative quantitative evaluation of conversations between HPs and patients (300 palliative patients at three time points) and a qualitative evaluation based on interview triads of patients, relatives and HPs. The evaluation of conversations will include patient-oriented outcomes, including perceived relationships with HPs and death and dying distress. We will also consider aspects of social inequality and gender. DISCUSSION: The intervention can provide a framework for open discussion of DD and a basis for enhancing a trustful HP-patient relationship in which such difficult topics can be addressed. The benefits of this study will include (a) the creation of the first consented semi-structured approach to identify and address DD and to respond therapeutically, (b) the multi-professional enhancement of confidence in dealing with patients’ DD and an intervention that can flexibly be integrated into other training and education programs and (c) an evaluation of effects of this intervention on patients, relatives and HPs, with attention to social inequality and gender. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00012988; registration date: 27.9.2017) and in the Health Services Research Database (VfD_DEDIPOM_17_003889; registration date: 14.9.2017). BioMed Central 2018-02-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5819295/ /pubmed/29458344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0279-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Kremeike, Kerstin
Galushko, Maren
Frerich, Gerrit
Romotzky, Vanessa
Hamacher, Stefanie
Rodin, Gary
Pfaff, Holger
Voltz, Raymond
The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol
title The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol
title_full The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol
title_fullStr The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol
title_short The DEsire to DIe in Palliative care: Optimization of Management (DEDIPOM) – a study protocol
title_sort desire to die in palliative care: optimization of management (dedipom) – a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5819295/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29458344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-018-0279-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kremeikekerstin thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT galushkomaren thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT frerichgerrit thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT romotzkyvanessa thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT hamacherstefanie thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT rodingary thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT pfaffholger thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT voltzraymond thedesiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT kremeikekerstin desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT galushkomaren desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT frerichgerrit desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT romotzkyvanessa desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT hamacherstefanie desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT rodingary desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT pfaffholger desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol
AT voltzraymond desiretodieinpalliativecareoptimizationofmanagementdedipomastudyprotocol