Cargando…

A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies

BACKGROUND: Numerous stem cell therapies use injection-based administration to deliver high-density cell preparations. However, cell retention rates as low as 1% have been observed within days of transplantation. This study investigated the effects of varying administration and formulation parameter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amer, Mahetab H., Rose, Felicity R. A. J., Shakesheff, Kevin M., White, Lisa J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0789-1
_version_ 1783301733429018624
author Amer, Mahetab H.
Rose, Felicity R. A. J.
Shakesheff, Kevin M.
White, Lisa J.
author_facet Amer, Mahetab H.
Rose, Felicity R. A. J.
Shakesheff, Kevin M.
White, Lisa J.
author_sort Amer, Mahetab H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Numerous stem cell therapies use injection-based administration to deliver high-density cell preparations. However, cell retention rates as low as 1% have been observed within days of transplantation. This study investigated the effects of varying administration and formulation parameters of injection-based administration on cell dose recovery and differentiation fate choice of human mesenchymal stem cells. METHODS: The impact of ejection rate via clinically relevant Hamilton micro-syringes and biomaterial-assisted delivery was investigated. Cell viability, the percentage of cell dose delivered as viable cells, proliferation capacity as well as differentiation behaviour in bipotential media were assessed. Characterisation of the biomaterial-based cell carriers was also carried out. RESULTS: A significant improvement of in-vitro dose recovery in cells co-ejected with natural biomaterials was observed, with ejections within 2% (w/v) gelatin resulting in 87.5 ± 14% of the cell dose being delivered as viable cells, compared to 32.2 ± 19% of the dose ejected in the commonly used saline vehicle at 10 μl/min. Improvement in cell recovery was not associated with the rheological properties of biomaterials utilised, as suggested by previous studies. The extent of osteogenic differentiation was shown to be substantially altered by choice of ejection rate and cell carrier, despite limited contact time with cells during ejection. Collagen type I and bone-derived extracellular matrix cell carriers yielded significant increases in mineralised matrix deposited at day 21 relative to PBS. CONCLUSIONS: An enhanced understanding of how administration protocols and biomaterials influence cell recovery, differentiation capacity and choice of fate will facilitate the development of improved administration and formulation approaches to achieve higher efficacy in stem cell transplantation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-018-0789-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5822649
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58226492018-02-26 A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies Amer, Mahetab H. Rose, Felicity R. A. J. Shakesheff, Kevin M. White, Lisa J. Stem Cell Res Ther Research BACKGROUND: Numerous stem cell therapies use injection-based administration to deliver high-density cell preparations. However, cell retention rates as low as 1% have been observed within days of transplantation. This study investigated the effects of varying administration and formulation parameters of injection-based administration on cell dose recovery and differentiation fate choice of human mesenchymal stem cells. METHODS: The impact of ejection rate via clinically relevant Hamilton micro-syringes and biomaterial-assisted delivery was investigated. Cell viability, the percentage of cell dose delivered as viable cells, proliferation capacity as well as differentiation behaviour in bipotential media were assessed. Characterisation of the biomaterial-based cell carriers was also carried out. RESULTS: A significant improvement of in-vitro dose recovery in cells co-ejected with natural biomaterials was observed, with ejections within 2% (w/v) gelatin resulting in 87.5 ± 14% of the cell dose being delivered as viable cells, compared to 32.2 ± 19% of the dose ejected in the commonly used saline vehicle at 10 μl/min. Improvement in cell recovery was not associated with the rheological properties of biomaterials utilised, as suggested by previous studies. The extent of osteogenic differentiation was shown to be substantially altered by choice of ejection rate and cell carrier, despite limited contact time with cells during ejection. Collagen type I and bone-derived extracellular matrix cell carriers yielded significant increases in mineralised matrix deposited at day 21 relative to PBS. CONCLUSIONS: An enhanced understanding of how administration protocols and biomaterials influence cell recovery, differentiation capacity and choice of fate will facilitate the development of improved administration and formulation approaches to achieve higher efficacy in stem cell transplantation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13287-018-0789-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5822649/ /pubmed/29467014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0789-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Amer, Mahetab H.
Rose, Felicity R. A. J.
Shakesheff, Kevin M.
White, Lisa J.
A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies
title A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies
title_full A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies
title_fullStr A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies
title_full_unstemmed A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies
title_short A biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies
title_sort biomaterials approach to influence stem cell fate in injectable cell-based therapies
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5822649/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29467014
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13287-018-0789-1
work_keys_str_mv AT amermahetabh abiomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies
AT rosefelicityraj abiomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies
AT shakesheffkevinm abiomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies
AT whitelisaj abiomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies
AT amermahetabh biomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies
AT rosefelicityraj biomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies
AT shakesheffkevinm biomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies
AT whitelisaj biomaterialsapproachtoinfluencestemcellfateininjectablecellbasedtherapies