Comparison of triple‐site ventricular pacing versus conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with systolic heart failure: A meta‐analysis of randomized and observational studies

BACKGROUND: Conventional cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT, Bi‐V) is associated with no response in about 40% patients due to an insufficient resynchronization. Some studies showed triple‐site ventricular (Tri‐V) pacing had greater benefits compared with Bi‐V pacing, but the results of these st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Baowei, Guo, Junfang, Zhang, Guohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Original Articles
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12018

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5828262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12018

Ejemplares similares