Cargando…
Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer?
Interfering with mitosis for cancer treatment is an old concept that has proven highly successful in the clinics. Microtubule poisons are used to treat patients with different types of blood or solid cancer since more than 20 years, but how these drugs achieve clinical response is still unclear. Arr...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29459486 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201745440 |
_version_ | 1783303911986167808 |
---|---|
author | Haschka, Manuel Karbon, Gerlinde Fava, Luca L Villunger, Andreas |
author_facet | Haschka, Manuel Karbon, Gerlinde Fava, Luca L Villunger, Andreas |
author_sort | Haschka, Manuel |
collection | PubMed |
description | Interfering with mitosis for cancer treatment is an old concept that has proven highly successful in the clinics. Microtubule poisons are used to treat patients with different types of blood or solid cancer since more than 20 years, but how these drugs achieve clinical response is still unclear. Arresting cells in mitosis can promote their demise, at least in a petri dish. Yet, at the molecular level, this type of cell death is poorly defined and cancer cells often find ways to escape. The signaling pathways activated can lead to mitotic slippage, cell death, or senescence. Therefore, any attempt to unravel the mechanistic action of microtubule poisons will have to investigate aspects of cell cycle control, cell death initiation in mitosis and after slippage, at single‐cell resolution. Here, we discuss possible mechanisms and signaling pathways controlling cell death in mitosis or after escape from mitotic arrest, as well as secondary consequences of mitotic errors, particularly sterile inflammation, and finally address the question how clinical efficacy of anti‐mitotic drugs may come about and could be improved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5836099 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58360992018-03-14 Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? Haschka, Manuel Karbon, Gerlinde Fava, Luca L Villunger, Andreas EMBO Rep Review Interfering with mitosis for cancer treatment is an old concept that has proven highly successful in the clinics. Microtubule poisons are used to treat patients with different types of blood or solid cancer since more than 20 years, but how these drugs achieve clinical response is still unclear. Arresting cells in mitosis can promote their demise, at least in a petri dish. Yet, at the molecular level, this type of cell death is poorly defined and cancer cells often find ways to escape. The signaling pathways activated can lead to mitotic slippage, cell death, or senescence. Therefore, any attempt to unravel the mechanistic action of microtubule poisons will have to investigate aspects of cell cycle control, cell death initiation in mitosis and after slippage, at single‐cell resolution. Here, we discuss possible mechanisms and signaling pathways controlling cell death in mitosis or after escape from mitotic arrest, as well as secondary consequences of mitotic errors, particularly sterile inflammation, and finally address the question how clinical efficacy of anti‐mitotic drugs may come about and could be improved. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-02-19 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5836099/ /pubmed/29459486 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201745440 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Haschka, Manuel Karbon, Gerlinde Fava, Luca L Villunger, Andreas Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? |
title | Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? |
title_full | Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? |
title_fullStr | Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? |
title_short | Perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? |
title_sort | perturbing mitosis for anti‐cancer therapy: is cell death the only answer? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5836099/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29459486 http://dx.doi.org/10.15252/embr.201745440 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haschkamanuel perturbingmitosisforanticancertherapyiscelldeaththeonlyanswer AT karbongerlinde perturbingmitosisforanticancertherapyiscelldeaththeonlyanswer AT favalucal perturbingmitosisforanticancertherapyiscelldeaththeonlyanswer AT villungerandreas perturbingmitosisforanticancertherapyiscelldeaththeonlyanswer |