Cargando…

A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration

PURPOSE: To develop an animal behavioral assay for the quantitative assessment of the functional efficacy of optogenetic therapies. METHODS: A triple-knockout (TKO) mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−)Opn4(−/−), and a double-knockout mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−), were employed. The expression of cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Qi, Ganjawala, Tushar H., Hattar, Samer, Abrams, Gary W., Pan, Zhuo-Hua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29625451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23278
_version_ 1783304383287525376
author Lu, Qi
Ganjawala, Tushar H.
Hattar, Samer
Abrams, Gary W.
Pan, Zhuo-Hua
author_facet Lu, Qi
Ganjawala, Tushar H.
Hattar, Samer
Abrams, Gary W.
Pan, Zhuo-Hua
author_sort Lu, Qi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To develop an animal behavioral assay for the quantitative assessment of the functional efficacy of optogenetic therapies. METHODS: A triple-knockout (TKO) mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−)Opn4(−/−), and a double-knockout mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−), were employed. The expression of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) and its three more light-sensitive mutants, ChR2-L132C, ChR2-L132C/T159C, and ChR2-132C/T159S, in inner retinal neurons was achieved using rAAV2 vectors via intravitreal delivery. Pupillary constriction was assessed by measuring the pupil diameter. The optomotor response (OMR) was examined using a homemade optomotor system equipped with light-emitting diodes as light stimulation. RESULTS: A robust OMR was restored in the ChR2-mutant-expressing TKO mice; however, significant pupillary constriction was observed only for the ChR2-L132C/T159S mutant. The ability to evoke an OMR was dependent on both the light intensity and grating frequency. The most light-sensitive frequency for the three ChR2 mutants was approximately 0.042 cycles per degree. Among the three ChR2 mutants, ChR2-L132C/T159S was the most light sensitive, followed by ChR2-L132C/T159C and ChR2-L132C. Melanopsin-mediated pupillary constriction resulted in a substantial reduction in the light sensitivity of the ChR2-mediated OMR. CONCLUSIONS: The OMR assay using TKO mice enabled the quantitative assessment of the efficacy of different optogenetic tools and the properties of optogenetically restored vision. Thus, the assay can serve as a valuable tool for developing effective optogenetic therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5839255
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58392552018-03-07 A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration Lu, Qi Ganjawala, Tushar H. Hattar, Samer Abrams, Gary W. Pan, Zhuo-Hua Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Visual Neuroscience PURPOSE: To develop an animal behavioral assay for the quantitative assessment of the functional efficacy of optogenetic therapies. METHODS: A triple-knockout (TKO) mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−)Opn4(−/−), and a double-knockout mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−), were employed. The expression of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) and its three more light-sensitive mutants, ChR2-L132C, ChR2-L132C/T159C, and ChR2-132C/T159S, in inner retinal neurons was achieved using rAAV2 vectors via intravitreal delivery. Pupillary constriction was assessed by measuring the pupil diameter. The optomotor response (OMR) was examined using a homemade optomotor system equipped with light-emitting diodes as light stimulation. RESULTS: A robust OMR was restored in the ChR2-mutant-expressing TKO mice; however, significant pupillary constriction was observed only for the ChR2-L132C/T159S mutant. The ability to evoke an OMR was dependent on both the light intensity and grating frequency. The most light-sensitive frequency for the three ChR2 mutants was approximately 0.042 cycles per degree. Among the three ChR2 mutants, ChR2-L132C/T159S was the most light sensitive, followed by ChR2-L132C/T159C and ChR2-L132C. Melanopsin-mediated pupillary constriction resulted in a substantial reduction in the light sensitivity of the ChR2-mediated OMR. CONCLUSIONS: The OMR assay using TKO mice enabled the quantitative assessment of the efficacy of different optogenetic tools and the properties of optogenetically restored vision. Thus, the assay can serve as a valuable tool for developing effective optogenetic therapies. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5839255/ /pubmed/29625451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23278 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Visual Neuroscience
Lu, Qi
Ganjawala, Tushar H.
Hattar, Samer
Abrams, Gary W.
Pan, Zhuo-Hua
A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration
title A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration
title_full A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration
title_fullStr A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration
title_full_unstemmed A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration
title_short A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration
title_sort robust optomotor assay for assessing the efficacy of optogenetic tools for vision restoration
topic Visual Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839255/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29625451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23278
work_keys_str_mv AT luqi arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT ganjawalatusharh arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT hattarsamer arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT abramsgaryw arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT panzhuohua arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT luqi robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT ganjawalatusharh robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT hattarsamer robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT abramsgaryw robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration
AT panzhuohua robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration