Cargando…
A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration
PURPOSE: To develop an animal behavioral assay for the quantitative assessment of the functional efficacy of optogenetic therapies. METHODS: A triple-knockout (TKO) mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−)Opn4(−/−), and a double-knockout mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−), were employed. The expression of cha...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29625451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23278 |
_version_ | 1783304383287525376 |
---|---|
author | Lu, Qi Ganjawala, Tushar H. Hattar, Samer Abrams, Gary W. Pan, Zhuo-Hua |
author_facet | Lu, Qi Ganjawala, Tushar H. Hattar, Samer Abrams, Gary W. Pan, Zhuo-Hua |
author_sort | Lu, Qi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To develop an animal behavioral assay for the quantitative assessment of the functional efficacy of optogenetic therapies. METHODS: A triple-knockout (TKO) mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−)Opn4(−/−), and a double-knockout mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−), were employed. The expression of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) and its three more light-sensitive mutants, ChR2-L132C, ChR2-L132C/T159C, and ChR2-132C/T159S, in inner retinal neurons was achieved using rAAV2 vectors via intravitreal delivery. Pupillary constriction was assessed by measuring the pupil diameter. The optomotor response (OMR) was examined using a homemade optomotor system equipped with light-emitting diodes as light stimulation. RESULTS: A robust OMR was restored in the ChR2-mutant-expressing TKO mice; however, significant pupillary constriction was observed only for the ChR2-L132C/T159S mutant. The ability to evoke an OMR was dependent on both the light intensity and grating frequency. The most light-sensitive frequency for the three ChR2 mutants was approximately 0.042 cycles per degree. Among the three ChR2 mutants, ChR2-L132C/T159S was the most light sensitive, followed by ChR2-L132C/T159C and ChR2-L132C. Melanopsin-mediated pupillary constriction resulted in a substantial reduction in the light sensitivity of the ChR2-mediated OMR. CONCLUSIONS: The OMR assay using TKO mice enabled the quantitative assessment of the efficacy of different optogenetic tools and the properties of optogenetically restored vision. Thus, the assay can serve as a valuable tool for developing effective optogenetic therapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5839255 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58392552018-03-07 A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration Lu, Qi Ganjawala, Tushar H. Hattar, Samer Abrams, Gary W. Pan, Zhuo-Hua Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Visual Neuroscience PURPOSE: To develop an animal behavioral assay for the quantitative assessment of the functional efficacy of optogenetic therapies. METHODS: A triple-knockout (TKO) mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−)Opn4(−/−), and a double-knockout mouse line, Gnat1(−/−)Cnga3(−/−), were employed. The expression of channelrhodopsin-2 (ChR2) and its three more light-sensitive mutants, ChR2-L132C, ChR2-L132C/T159C, and ChR2-132C/T159S, in inner retinal neurons was achieved using rAAV2 vectors via intravitreal delivery. Pupillary constriction was assessed by measuring the pupil diameter. The optomotor response (OMR) was examined using a homemade optomotor system equipped with light-emitting diodes as light stimulation. RESULTS: A robust OMR was restored in the ChR2-mutant-expressing TKO mice; however, significant pupillary constriction was observed only for the ChR2-L132C/T159S mutant. The ability to evoke an OMR was dependent on both the light intensity and grating frequency. The most light-sensitive frequency for the three ChR2 mutants was approximately 0.042 cycles per degree. Among the three ChR2 mutants, ChR2-L132C/T159S was the most light sensitive, followed by ChR2-L132C/T159C and ChR2-L132C. Melanopsin-mediated pupillary constriction resulted in a substantial reduction in the light sensitivity of the ChR2-mediated OMR. CONCLUSIONS: The OMR assay using TKO mice enabled the quantitative assessment of the efficacy of different optogenetic tools and the properties of optogenetically restored vision. Thus, the assay can serve as a valuable tool for developing effective optogenetic therapies. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5839255/ /pubmed/29625451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23278 Text en Copyright 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Visual Neuroscience Lu, Qi Ganjawala, Tushar H. Hattar, Samer Abrams, Gary W. Pan, Zhuo-Hua A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration |
title | A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration |
title_full | A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration |
title_fullStr | A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration |
title_full_unstemmed | A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration |
title_short | A Robust Optomotor Assay for Assessing the Efficacy of Optogenetic Tools for Vision Restoration |
title_sort | robust optomotor assay for assessing the efficacy of optogenetic tools for vision restoration |
topic | Visual Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5839255/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29625451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.17-23278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT luqi arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT ganjawalatusharh arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT hattarsamer arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT abramsgaryw arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT panzhuohua arobustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT luqi robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT ganjawalatusharh robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT hattarsamer robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT abramsgaryw robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration AT panzhuohua robustoptomotorassayforassessingtheefficacyofoptogenetictoolsforvisionrestoration |