Cargando…
Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals
[Image: see text] The importance of relativity and dispersion in metallophilicity has been discussed in numerous studies. The existence of hybridization in the bonding between closed shell d(10)–d(10) metal atoms has also been speculated, but the presence of attractive MO interaction in the metal–me...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American
Chemical Society
2018
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29431436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02994 |
_version_ | 1783304885674967040 |
---|---|
author | Brands, Maria B. Nitsch, Jörn Guerra, Célia Fonseca |
author_facet | Brands, Maria B. Nitsch, Jörn Guerra, Célia Fonseca |
author_sort | Brands, Maria B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] The importance of relativity and dispersion in metallophilicity has been discussed in numerous studies. The existence of hybridization in the bonding between closed shell d(10)–d(10) metal atoms has also been speculated, but the presence of attractive MO interaction in the metal–metal bond is still a matter of an ongoing debate. In this comparative study, a quantitative molecular orbital analysis and energy decomposition is carried out on the metallophilic interaction in atomic dimers (M(+)···M(+)) and molecular perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X](2) (where M = Cu, Ag, and Au; X = F, Cl, Br, and I). Our computational studies prove that besides the commonly accepted dispersive interactions, orbital interactions and Pauli repulsion also play a crucial role in the strength and length of the metal–metal bond. Although for M(+)···M(+) the orbital interaction is larger than the Pauli repulsion, leading to a net attractive MO interaction, the bonding mechanism in perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X] dimers is different due to the larger separation between the donor and acceptor orbitals. Thus, Pauli repulsion is much larger, and two-orbital, four-electron repulsion is dominant. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5842375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American
Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58423752018-03-12 Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals Brands, Maria B. Nitsch, Jörn Guerra, Célia Fonseca Inorg Chem [Image: see text] The importance of relativity and dispersion in metallophilicity has been discussed in numerous studies. The existence of hybridization in the bonding between closed shell d(10)–d(10) metal atoms has also been speculated, but the presence of attractive MO interaction in the metal–metal bond is still a matter of an ongoing debate. In this comparative study, a quantitative molecular orbital analysis and energy decomposition is carried out on the metallophilic interaction in atomic dimers (M(+)···M(+)) and molecular perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X](2) (where M = Cu, Ag, and Au; X = F, Cl, Br, and I). Our computational studies prove that besides the commonly accepted dispersive interactions, orbital interactions and Pauli repulsion also play a crucial role in the strength and length of the metal–metal bond. Although for M(+)···M(+) the orbital interaction is larger than the Pauli repulsion, leading to a net attractive MO interaction, the bonding mechanism in perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X] dimers is different due to the larger separation between the donor and acceptor orbitals. Thus, Pauli repulsion is much larger, and two-orbital, four-electron repulsion is dominant. American Chemical Society 2018-02-12 2018-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5842375/ /pubmed/29431436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02994 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Brands, Maria B. Nitsch, Jörn Guerra, Célia Fonseca Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals |
title | Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion
in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals |
title_full | Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion
in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals |
title_fullStr | Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion
in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals |
title_full_unstemmed | Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion
in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals |
title_short | Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion
in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals |
title_sort | relevance of orbital interactions and pauli repulsion
in the metal–metal bond of coinage metals |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29431436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02994 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brandsmariab relevanceoforbitalinteractionsandpaulirepulsioninthemetalmetalbondofcoinagemetals AT nitschjorn relevanceoforbitalinteractionsandpaulirepulsioninthemetalmetalbondofcoinagemetals AT guerraceliafonseca relevanceoforbitalinteractionsandpaulirepulsioninthemetalmetalbondofcoinagemetals |