Cargando…

Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals

[Image: see text] The importance of relativity and dispersion in metallophilicity has been discussed in numerous studies. The existence of hybridization in the bonding between closed shell d(10)–d(10) metal atoms has also been speculated, but the presence of attractive MO interaction in the metal–me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brands, Maria B., Nitsch, Jörn, Guerra, Célia Fonseca
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29431436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02994
_version_ 1783304885674967040
author Brands, Maria B.
Nitsch, Jörn
Guerra, Célia Fonseca
author_facet Brands, Maria B.
Nitsch, Jörn
Guerra, Célia Fonseca
author_sort Brands, Maria B.
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] The importance of relativity and dispersion in metallophilicity has been discussed in numerous studies. The existence of hybridization in the bonding between closed shell d(10)–d(10) metal atoms has also been speculated, but the presence of attractive MO interaction in the metal–metal bond is still a matter of an ongoing debate. In this comparative study, a quantitative molecular orbital analysis and energy decomposition is carried out on the metallophilic interaction in atomic dimers (M(+)···M(+)) and molecular perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X](2) (where M = Cu, Ag, and Au; X = F, Cl, Br, and I). Our computational studies prove that besides the commonly accepted dispersive interactions, orbital interactions and Pauli repulsion also play a crucial role in the strength and length of the metal–metal bond. Although for M(+)···M(+) the orbital interaction is larger than the Pauli repulsion, leading to a net attractive MO interaction, the bonding mechanism in perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X] dimers is different due to the larger separation between the donor and acceptor orbitals. Thus, Pauli repulsion is much larger, and two-orbital, four-electron repulsion is dominant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58423752018-03-12 Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals Brands, Maria B. Nitsch, Jörn Guerra, Célia Fonseca Inorg Chem [Image: see text] The importance of relativity and dispersion in metallophilicity has been discussed in numerous studies. The existence of hybridization in the bonding between closed shell d(10)–d(10) metal atoms has also been speculated, but the presence of attractive MO interaction in the metal–metal bond is still a matter of an ongoing debate. In this comparative study, a quantitative molecular orbital analysis and energy decomposition is carried out on the metallophilic interaction in atomic dimers (M(+)···M(+)) and molecular perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X](2) (where M = Cu, Ag, and Au; X = F, Cl, Br, and I). Our computational studies prove that besides the commonly accepted dispersive interactions, orbital interactions and Pauli repulsion also play a crucial role in the strength and length of the metal–metal bond. Although for M(+)···M(+) the orbital interaction is larger than the Pauli repulsion, leading to a net attractive MO interaction, the bonding mechanism in perpendicular [H(3)P–M–X] dimers is different due to the larger separation between the donor and acceptor orbitals. Thus, Pauli repulsion is much larger, and two-orbital, four-electron repulsion is dominant. American Chemical Society 2018-02-12 2018-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5842375/ /pubmed/29431436 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02994 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Brands, Maria B.
Nitsch, Jörn
Guerra, Célia Fonseca
Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals
title Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals
title_full Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals
title_fullStr Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals
title_full_unstemmed Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals
title_short Relevance of Orbital Interactions and Pauli Repulsion in the Metal–Metal Bond of Coinage Metals
title_sort relevance of orbital interactions and pauli repulsion in the metal–metal bond of coinage metals
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29431436
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.7b02994
work_keys_str_mv AT brandsmariab relevanceoforbitalinteractionsandpaulirepulsioninthemetalmetalbondofcoinagemetals
AT nitschjorn relevanceoforbitalinteractionsandpaulirepulsioninthemetalmetalbondofcoinagemetals
AT guerraceliafonseca relevanceoforbitalinteractionsandpaulirepulsioninthemetalmetalbondofcoinagemetals