Cargando…

Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?

Little is known on how well senescence markers in vitro and in situ correlate within individual donors. We studied correlations between the same and different in vitro markers. Furthermore, we tested correlations between in vitro markers with in situ p16INK4a positivity. From 100 donors (20-91 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Waaijer, Mariëtte E.C., Gunn, David A., van Heemst, Diana, Slagboom, P. Eline, Sedivy, John M., Dirks, Roeland W., Tanke, Hans J., Westendorp, Rudi G.J., Maier, Andrea B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500330
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101389
_version_ 1783304978202361856
author Waaijer, Mariëtte E.C.
Gunn, David A.
van Heemst, Diana
Slagboom, P. Eline
Sedivy, John M.
Dirks, Roeland W.
Tanke, Hans J.
Westendorp, Rudi G.J.
Maier, Andrea B.
author_facet Waaijer, Mariëtte E.C.
Gunn, David A.
van Heemst, Diana
Slagboom, P. Eline
Sedivy, John M.
Dirks, Roeland W.
Tanke, Hans J.
Westendorp, Rudi G.J.
Maier, Andrea B.
author_sort Waaijer, Mariëtte E.C.
collection PubMed
description Little is known on how well senescence markers in vitro and in situ correlate within individual donors. We studied correlations between the same and different in vitro markers. Furthermore, we tested correlations between in vitro markers with in situ p16INK4a positivity. From 100 donors (20-91 years), cultured dermal fibroblasts were assessed for reactive oxygen species (ROS), telomere-associated foci (TAF), p16INK4a and senescence-associated β-gal (SAβ-gal), with/ without 0.6 µM rotenone for 3 days (short-term). In fibroblasts from 40 donors, telomere shortening, ROS and SAβ-gal were additionally assessed, with/ without 20 nM rotenone for 7 weeks (long-term). In skin from 52 donors, the number of p16INK4a positive dermal cells was assessed in situ. More than half of the correlations of the same senescence markers in vitro between duplicate experiments and between short-term versus long-term experiments were significant. Half of the different senescence marker correlations were significant within the short-term and within the long-term experiments. The different senescence markers in vitro were not significantly correlated intra-individually with in situ p16INK4a positivity.
In conclusion, the same and different senescence markers are frequently correlated significantly within and between in vitro experiments, but in vitro senescence markers are not correlated with p16INK4a positivity in situ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5842854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Impact Journals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58428542018-03-14 Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors? Waaijer, Mariëtte E.C. Gunn, David A. van Heemst, Diana Slagboom, P. Eline Sedivy, John M. Dirks, Roeland W. Tanke, Hans J. Westendorp, Rudi G.J. Maier, Andrea B. Aging (Albany NY) Research Paper Little is known on how well senescence markers in vitro and in situ correlate within individual donors. We studied correlations between the same and different in vitro markers. Furthermore, we tested correlations between in vitro markers with in situ p16INK4a positivity. From 100 donors (20-91 years), cultured dermal fibroblasts were assessed for reactive oxygen species (ROS), telomere-associated foci (TAF), p16INK4a and senescence-associated β-gal (SAβ-gal), with/ without 0.6 µM rotenone for 3 days (short-term). In fibroblasts from 40 donors, telomere shortening, ROS and SAβ-gal were additionally assessed, with/ without 20 nM rotenone for 7 weeks (long-term). In skin from 52 donors, the number of p16INK4a positive dermal cells was assessed in situ. More than half of the correlations of the same senescence markers in vitro between duplicate experiments and between short-term versus long-term experiments were significant. Half of the different senescence marker correlations were significant within the short-term and within the long-term experiments. The different senescence markers in vitro were not significantly correlated intra-individually with in situ p16INK4a positivity.
In conclusion, the same and different senescence markers are frequently correlated significantly within and between in vitro experiments, but in vitro senescence markers are not correlated with p16INK4a positivity in situ. Impact Journals 2018-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5842854/ /pubmed/29500330 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101389 Text en Copyright © 2018 Waaijer et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) 3.0 License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Waaijer, Mariëtte E.C.
Gunn, David A.
van Heemst, Diana
Slagboom, P. Eline
Sedivy, John M.
Dirks, Roeland W.
Tanke, Hans J.
Westendorp, Rudi G.J.
Maier, Andrea B.
Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
title Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
title_full Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
title_fullStr Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
title_full_unstemmed Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
title_short Do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
title_sort do senescence markers correlate in vitro and in situ within individual human donors?
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29500330
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.101389
work_keys_str_mv AT waaijermarietteec dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT gunndavida dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT vanheemstdiana dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT slagboompeline dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT sedivyjohnm dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT dirksroelandw dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT tankehansj dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT westendorprudigj dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors
AT maierandreab dosenescencemarkerscorrelateinvitroandinsituwithinindividualhumandonors