Cargando…

NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

OBJECTIVE: Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutations have prognostic importance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with intermediate-risk karyotype at diagnosis. Approximately 30% of newly diagnosed cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients harbor the NPM1 mutation in India. In this study we compare...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Dushyant, Mehta, Anurag, Panigrahi, Manoj Kumar, Nath, Sukanta, Saikia, Kandarpa Kumar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Galenos Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29129825
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2017.0095
_version_ 1783305135378661376
author Kumar, Dushyant
Mehta, Anurag
Panigrahi, Manoj Kumar
Nath, Sukanta
Saikia, Kandarpa Kumar
author_facet Kumar, Dushyant
Mehta, Anurag
Panigrahi, Manoj Kumar
Nath, Sukanta
Saikia, Kandarpa Kumar
author_sort Kumar, Dushyant
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutations have prognostic importance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with intermediate-risk karyotype at diagnosis. Approximately 30% of newly diagnosed cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients harbor the NPM1 mutation in India. In this study we compared the efficiency of three molecular techniques in detecting NPM1 mutation in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center cohort we analyzed 165 CN-AML bone marrow/peripheral blood samples for NPM1 mutation analysis. About 30% of the CN-AML samples revealed NPM1 mutations. For the detection, three methods were compared: Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: NPM1 exon 12 mutations were observed in 52 (31.51%) of all CN-AML cases. The sensitivity of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and real-time PCR was 80%, 90%, and 95%, whereas specificity was 95%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The minimum limit of mutation detection was 20%-30% for Sanger sequencing, 1%-5% for pyrosequencing, and 0.1%-1% for real-time PCR. CONCLUSION: The sequencing method, which is the reference method, has the lowest sensitivity and is sometimes difficult to interpret. Real-time PCR is a highly sensitive method for mutation detection but is limited for specific mutation types. In our study, pyrosequencing emerged as the most suitable technique for the detection of NPM1 mutations on the basis of its easy interpretation and less time-consuming processes than Sanger sequencing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5843774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Galenos Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58437742018-03-13 NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Kumar, Dushyant Mehta, Anurag Panigrahi, Manoj Kumar Nath, Sukanta Saikia, Kandarpa Kumar Turk J Haematol Research Article OBJECTIVE: Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutations have prognostic importance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with intermediate-risk karyotype at diagnosis. Approximately 30% of newly diagnosed cytogenetically normal AML (CN-AML) patients harbor the NPM1 mutation in India. In this study we compared the efficiency of three molecular techniques in detecting NPM1 mutation in peripheral blood and bone marrow samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center cohort we analyzed 165 CN-AML bone marrow/peripheral blood samples for NPM1 mutation analysis. About 30% of the CN-AML samples revealed NPM1 mutations. For the detection, three methods were compared: Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). RESULTS: NPM1 exon 12 mutations were observed in 52 (31.51%) of all CN-AML cases. The sensitivity of Sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and real-time PCR was 80%, 90%, and 95%, whereas specificity was 95%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The minimum limit of mutation detection was 20%-30% for Sanger sequencing, 1%-5% for pyrosequencing, and 0.1%-1% for real-time PCR. CONCLUSION: The sequencing method, which is the reference method, has the lowest sensitivity and is sometimes difficult to interpret. Real-time PCR is a highly sensitive method for mutation detection but is limited for specific mutation types. In our study, pyrosequencing emerged as the most suitable technique for the detection of NPM1 mutations on the basis of its easy interpretation and less time-consuming processes than Sanger sequencing. Galenos Publishing 2018-03 2018-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5843774/ /pubmed/29129825 http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2017.0095 Text en © Copyright 2018, Turkish Journal of Hematology, Published by Galenos Publishing. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kumar, Dushyant
Mehta, Anurag
Panigrahi, Manoj Kumar
Nath, Sukanta
Saikia, Kandarpa Kumar
NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
title NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_full NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_fullStr NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_full_unstemmed NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_short NPM1 Mutation Analysis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Comparison of Three Techniques - Sanger Sequencing, Pyrosequencing, and Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction
title_sort npm1 mutation analysis in acute myeloid leukemia: comparison of three techniques - sanger sequencing, pyrosequencing, and real-time polymerase chain reaction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5843774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29129825
http://dx.doi.org/10.4274/tjh.2017.0095
work_keys_str_mv AT kumardushyant npm1mutationanalysisinacutemyeloidleukemiacomparisonofthreetechniquessangersequencingpyrosequencingandrealtimepolymerasechainreaction
AT mehtaanurag npm1mutationanalysisinacutemyeloidleukemiacomparisonofthreetechniquessangersequencingpyrosequencingandrealtimepolymerasechainreaction
AT panigrahimanojkumar npm1mutationanalysisinacutemyeloidleukemiacomparisonofthreetechniquessangersequencingpyrosequencingandrealtimepolymerasechainreaction
AT nathsukanta npm1mutationanalysisinacutemyeloidleukemiacomparisonofthreetechniquessangersequencingpyrosequencingandrealtimepolymerasechainreaction
AT saikiakandarpakumar npm1mutationanalysisinacutemyeloidleukemiacomparisonofthreetechniquessangersequencingpyrosequencingandrealtimepolymerasechainreaction