Cargando…

An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity

PURPOSE: To investigate the concurrent, face and content validity of an evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool). METHODS: 1) Concurrent validity of the MAP-BC evaluation tool was investigated by exploring correlations (Spearman’s rank Correla...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Groef, An, Van Kampen, Marijke, Moortgat, Peter, Anthonissen, Mieke, Van den Kerckhove, Eric, Christiaens, Marie-Rose, Neven, Patrick, Geraerts, Inge, Devoogdt, Nele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5844553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193915
_version_ 1783305255995310080
author De Groef, An
Van Kampen, Marijke
Moortgat, Peter
Anthonissen, Mieke
Van den Kerckhove, Eric
Christiaens, Marie-Rose
Neven, Patrick
Geraerts, Inge
Devoogdt, Nele
author_facet De Groef, An
Van Kampen, Marijke
Moortgat, Peter
Anthonissen, Mieke
Van den Kerckhove, Eric
Christiaens, Marie-Rose
Neven, Patrick
Geraerts, Inge
Devoogdt, Nele
author_sort De Groef, An
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the concurrent, face and content validity of an evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool). METHODS: 1) Concurrent validity of the MAP-BC evaluation tool was investigated by exploring correlations (Spearman’s rank Correlation Coefficient) between the subjective scores (0 –no adhesions to 3 –very strong adhesions) of the skin level using the MAP-BC evaluation tool and objective elasticity parameters (maximal skin extension and gross elasticity) generated by the Cutometer Dual MPA 580. Nine different examination points on and around the mastectomy scar were evaluated. 2) Face and content validity were explored by questioning therapists experienced with myofascial therapy in breast cancer patients about the comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the MAP-BC evaluation tool. RESULTS: 1) Only three meaningful correlations were found on the mastectomy scar. For the most lateral examination point on the mastectomy scar a moderate negative correlation (-0.44, p = 0.01) with the maximal skin extension and a moderate positive correlation with the resistance versus ability of returning or ‘gross elasticity’ (0.42, p = 0.02) were found. For the middle point on the mastectomy scar an almost moderate positive correlation with gross elasticity was found as well (0.38, p = 0.04) 2) Content and face validity have been found to be good. Eighty-nine percent of the respondent found the instructions understandable and 98% found the scoring system obvious. Thirty-seven percent of the therapists suggested to add the possibility to evaluate additional anatomical locations in case of reconstructive and/or bilateral surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The MAP-BC evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in breast cancer patients has good face and content validity. Evidence for good concurrent validity of the skin level was found only on the mastectomy scar itself.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5844553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58445532018-03-23 An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity De Groef, An Van Kampen, Marijke Moortgat, Peter Anthonissen, Mieke Van den Kerckhove, Eric Christiaens, Marie-Rose Neven, Patrick Geraerts, Inge Devoogdt, Nele PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To investigate the concurrent, face and content validity of an evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool). METHODS: 1) Concurrent validity of the MAP-BC evaluation tool was investigated by exploring correlations (Spearman’s rank Correlation Coefficient) between the subjective scores (0 –no adhesions to 3 –very strong adhesions) of the skin level using the MAP-BC evaluation tool and objective elasticity parameters (maximal skin extension and gross elasticity) generated by the Cutometer Dual MPA 580. Nine different examination points on and around the mastectomy scar were evaluated. 2) Face and content validity were explored by questioning therapists experienced with myofascial therapy in breast cancer patients about the comprehensibility and comprehensiveness of the MAP-BC evaluation tool. RESULTS: 1) Only three meaningful correlations were found on the mastectomy scar. For the most lateral examination point on the mastectomy scar a moderate negative correlation (-0.44, p = 0.01) with the maximal skin extension and a moderate positive correlation with the resistance versus ability of returning or ‘gross elasticity’ (0.42, p = 0.02) were found. For the middle point on the mastectomy scar an almost moderate positive correlation with gross elasticity was found as well (0.38, p = 0.04) 2) Content and face validity have been found to be good. Eighty-nine percent of the respondent found the instructions understandable and 98% found the scoring system obvious. Thirty-seven percent of the therapists suggested to add the possibility to evaluate additional anatomical locations in case of reconstructive and/or bilateral surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The MAP-BC evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in breast cancer patients has good face and content validity. Evidence for good concurrent validity of the skin level was found only on the mastectomy scar itself. Public Library of Science 2018-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5844553/ /pubmed/29522540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193915 Text en © 2018 De Groef et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
De Groef, An
Van Kampen, Marijke
Moortgat, Peter
Anthonissen, Mieke
Van den Kerckhove, Eric
Christiaens, Marie-Rose
Neven, Patrick
Geraerts, Inge
Devoogdt, Nele
An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity
title An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity
title_full An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity
title_fullStr An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity
title_short An evaluation tool for Myofascial Adhesions in Patients after Breast Cancer (MAP-BC evaluation tool): Concurrent, face and content validity
title_sort evaluation tool for myofascial adhesions in patients after breast cancer (map-bc evaluation tool): concurrent, face and content validity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5844553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193915
work_keys_str_mv AT degroefan anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT vankampenmarijke anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT moortgatpeter anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT anthonissenmieke anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT vandenkerckhoveeric anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT christiaensmarierose anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT nevenpatrick anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT geraertsinge anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT devoogdtnele anevaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT degroefan evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT vankampenmarijke evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT moortgatpeter evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT anthonissenmieke evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT vandenkerckhoveeric evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT christiaensmarierose evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT nevenpatrick evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT geraertsinge evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity
AT devoogdtnele evaluationtoolformyofascialadhesionsinpatientsafterbreastcancermapbcevaluationtoolconcurrentfaceandcontentvalidity