RapidArc vs Conventional IMRT for Head and Neck Cancer Irradiation: Is Faster Necessary Better?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to dosimetrically evaluate and compare double arc RapidArc (RA) with conventional IMRT (7 fields) plans for irradiation of locally advanced head and neck cancers (LAHNC), focusing on target coverage and doses received by organs at risk (OAR). METHODS: Computed tomo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mashhour, Karim, Kamaleldin, Maha, Hashem, Wedad
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention 2018
Materias:
Research Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5844619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373915
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.1.207

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5844619/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373915
http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.1.207

Ejemplares similares