Cargando…
RapidArc vs Conventional IMRT for Head and Neck Cancer Irradiation: Is Faster Necessary Better?
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to dosimetrically evaluate and compare double arc RapidArc (RA) with conventional IMRT (7 fields) plans for irradiation of locally advanced head and neck cancers (LAHNC), focusing on target coverage and doses received by organs at risk (OAR). METHODS: Computed tomo...
Autores principales: | Mashhour, Karim, Kamaleldin, Maha, Hashem, Wedad |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
West Asia Organization for Cancer Prevention
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5844619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29373915 http://dx.doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.1.207 |
Ejemplares similares
-
3D-CRT versus RapidArc in Deep Tempero-Parietal High Grade Gliomas: Do We Really Need Higher Technology?
por: Mashhour, Karim, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
IMRT, RapidArc® and conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of tumours of the anal canal
por: Cendales, Ricardo, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Lung SBRT: dosimetric and delivery comparison of RapidArc, TomoTherapy, and IMRT
por: Weyh, Ashleigh, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA
por: Chandraraj, Varatharaj, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Plan comparison of volumetric-modulated arc therapy (RapidArc) and conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in anal canal cancer
por: Vieillot, Sabine, et al.
Publicado: (2010)