Cargando…

Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom

The dopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia is the main concept explaining the direct reasons of schizophrenia and the effectiveness of current antipsychotics. All antipsychotics present on the market are potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists or partial agonists. In this work we investigate a s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaczor, Agnieszka A., Żuk, Justyna, Matosiuk, Dariusz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-018-2137-5
_version_ 1783306968095522816
author Kaczor, Agnieszka A.
Żuk, Justyna
Matosiuk, Dariusz
author_facet Kaczor, Agnieszka A.
Żuk, Justyna
Matosiuk, Dariusz
author_sort Kaczor, Agnieszka A.
collection PubMed
description The dopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia is the main concept explaining the direct reasons of schizophrenia and the effectiveness of current antipsychotics. All antipsychotics present on the market are potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists or partial agonists. In this work we investigate a series of dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists which do not fulfill the criteria of the classical pharmacophore model as they do not possess a protonatable nitrogen atom necessary to interact with the conserved Asp(3.32). Such compounds are interesting, inter alia, due to possible better pharmacokinetic profile when compared to basic, ionizable molecules. By means of homology modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics we determined that the compounds investigated interact with Asp(3.32) via their amide nitrogen atom. It was found that the studied compounds stabilize the receptor inactive conformation through the effect on the ionic lock, which is typical for GPCR antagonists. We constructed a CoMFA model for the studied compounds with the following statistics: R(2) = 0.95, Q(2) = 0.63. The quality of the CoMFA model was confirmed by high value of R(2) of the test set, equal 0.96. The CoMFA model indicated two regions where bulky substituents are favored and two regions where bulky substituents are not beneficial. Two red contour regions near carbonyl groups were identified meaning that negative charge would be favored here. Furthermore, the S-oxide group is connected with blue contour region meaning that positive charge is favored in this position. These findings may be applied for further optimization of the studied compound series. [Image: see text]
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5854747
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58547472018-03-22 Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom Kaczor, Agnieszka A. Żuk, Justyna Matosiuk, Dariusz Med Chem Res Original Research The dopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia is the main concept explaining the direct reasons of schizophrenia and the effectiveness of current antipsychotics. All antipsychotics present on the market are potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists or partial agonists. In this work we investigate a series of dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists which do not fulfill the criteria of the classical pharmacophore model as they do not possess a protonatable nitrogen atom necessary to interact with the conserved Asp(3.32). Such compounds are interesting, inter alia, due to possible better pharmacokinetic profile when compared to basic, ionizable molecules. By means of homology modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics we determined that the compounds investigated interact with Asp(3.32) via their amide nitrogen atom. It was found that the studied compounds stabilize the receptor inactive conformation through the effect on the ionic lock, which is typical for GPCR antagonists. We constructed a CoMFA model for the studied compounds with the following statistics: R(2) = 0.95, Q(2) = 0.63. The quality of the CoMFA model was confirmed by high value of R(2) of the test set, equal 0.96. The CoMFA model indicated two regions where bulky substituents are favored and two regions where bulky substituents are not beneficial. Two red contour regions near carbonyl groups were identified meaning that negative charge would be favored here. Furthermore, the S-oxide group is connected with blue contour region meaning that positive charge is favored in this position. These findings may be applied for further optimization of the studied compound series. [Image: see text] Springer US 2018-02-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5854747/ /pubmed/29576721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-018-2137-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Kaczor, Agnieszka A.
Żuk, Justyna
Matosiuk, Dariusz
Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
title Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
title_full Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
title_fullStr Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
title_full_unstemmed Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
title_short Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
title_sort comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine d(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854747/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576721
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-018-2137-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kaczoragnieszkaa comparativemolecularfieldanalysisandmoleculardynamicsstudiesofthedopamined2receptorantagonistswithoutaprotonatablenitrogenatom
AT zukjustyna comparativemolecularfieldanalysisandmoleculardynamicsstudiesofthedopamined2receptorantagonistswithoutaprotonatablenitrogenatom
AT matosiukdariusz comparativemolecularfieldanalysisandmoleculardynamicsstudiesofthedopamined2receptorantagonistswithoutaprotonatablenitrogenatom