Cargando…
Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom
The dopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia is the main concept explaining the direct reasons of schizophrenia and the effectiveness of current antipsychotics. All antipsychotics present on the market are potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists or partial agonists. In this work we investigate a s...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-018-2137-5 |
_version_ | 1783306968095522816 |
---|---|
author | Kaczor, Agnieszka A. Żuk, Justyna Matosiuk, Dariusz |
author_facet | Kaczor, Agnieszka A. Żuk, Justyna Matosiuk, Dariusz |
author_sort | Kaczor, Agnieszka A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The dopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia is the main concept explaining the direct reasons of schizophrenia and the effectiveness of current antipsychotics. All antipsychotics present on the market are potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists or partial agonists. In this work we investigate a series of dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists which do not fulfill the criteria of the classical pharmacophore model as they do not possess a protonatable nitrogen atom necessary to interact with the conserved Asp(3.32). Such compounds are interesting, inter alia, due to possible better pharmacokinetic profile when compared to basic, ionizable molecules. By means of homology modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics we determined that the compounds investigated interact with Asp(3.32) via their amide nitrogen atom. It was found that the studied compounds stabilize the receptor inactive conformation through the effect on the ionic lock, which is typical for GPCR antagonists. We constructed a CoMFA model for the studied compounds with the following statistics: R(2) = 0.95, Q(2) = 0.63. The quality of the CoMFA model was confirmed by high value of R(2) of the test set, equal 0.96. The CoMFA model indicated two regions where bulky substituents are favored and two regions where bulky substituents are not beneficial. Two red contour regions near carbonyl groups were identified meaning that negative charge would be favored here. Furthermore, the S-oxide group is connected with blue contour region meaning that positive charge is favored in this position. These findings may be applied for further optimization of the studied compound series. [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5854747 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58547472018-03-22 Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom Kaczor, Agnieszka A. Żuk, Justyna Matosiuk, Dariusz Med Chem Res Original Research The dopaminergic hypothesis of schizophrenia is the main concept explaining the direct reasons of schizophrenia and the effectiveness of current antipsychotics. All antipsychotics present on the market are potent dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists or partial agonists. In this work we investigate a series of dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists which do not fulfill the criteria of the classical pharmacophore model as they do not possess a protonatable nitrogen atom necessary to interact with the conserved Asp(3.32). Such compounds are interesting, inter alia, due to possible better pharmacokinetic profile when compared to basic, ionizable molecules. By means of homology modeling, molecular docking and molecular dynamics we determined that the compounds investigated interact with Asp(3.32) via their amide nitrogen atom. It was found that the studied compounds stabilize the receptor inactive conformation through the effect on the ionic lock, which is typical for GPCR antagonists. We constructed a CoMFA model for the studied compounds with the following statistics: R(2) = 0.95, Q(2) = 0.63. The quality of the CoMFA model was confirmed by high value of R(2) of the test set, equal 0.96. The CoMFA model indicated two regions where bulky substituents are favored and two regions where bulky substituents are not beneficial. Two red contour regions near carbonyl groups were identified meaning that negative charge would be favored here. Furthermore, the S-oxide group is connected with blue contour region meaning that positive charge is favored in this position. These findings may be applied for further optimization of the studied compound series. [Image: see text] Springer US 2018-02-13 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5854747/ /pubmed/29576721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-018-2137-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Kaczor, Agnieszka A. Żuk, Justyna Matosiuk, Dariusz Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom |
title | Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom |
title_full | Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom |
title_fullStr | Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom |
title_short | Comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine D(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom |
title_sort | comparative molecular field analysis and molecular dynamics studies of the dopamine d(2) receptor antagonists without a protonatable nitrogen atom |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5854747/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29576721 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00044-018-2137-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kaczoragnieszkaa comparativemolecularfieldanalysisandmoleculardynamicsstudiesofthedopamined2receptorantagonistswithoutaprotonatablenitrogenatom AT zukjustyna comparativemolecularfieldanalysisandmoleculardynamicsstudiesofthedopamined2receptorantagonistswithoutaprotonatablenitrogenatom AT matosiukdariusz comparativemolecularfieldanalysisandmoleculardynamicsstudiesofthedopamined2receptorantagonistswithoutaprotonatablenitrogenatom |