Cargando…
Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study
Evaluation of food palatability and preference is of great importance to the pet food industry. One common technique for evaluating palatability is a 2-bowl test in which 2 products are offered simultaneously and food consumption is measured. This yields clear results with dogs trained to routinely...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx016 |
_version_ | 1783308411450949632 |
---|---|
author | Hall, Nathaniel J. Péron, Franck Cambou, Stéphanie Callejon, Laurence Wynne, Clive D.L. |
author_facet | Hall, Nathaniel J. Péron, Franck Cambou, Stéphanie Callejon, Laurence Wynne, Clive D.L. |
author_sort | Hall, Nathaniel J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evaluation of food palatability and preference is of great importance to the pet food industry. One common technique for evaluating palatability is a 2-bowl test in which 2 products are offered simultaneously and food consumption is measured. This yields clear results with dogs trained to routinely conduct such comparisons, but it is less clear how this extends to untrained pet dogs. In addition, prior research indicates that olfaction is important in food preference, but methods for evaluating odor preference in canines are currently lacking. In this study, we developed a modified 2-bowl test for evaluation of food preferences in pet dogs with minimal training, and an olfactometer technique for the evaluation of odor preferences. In our 2-bowl procedure, we observed clear preferences among 4 commercial food products in 6 pet dogs. Across repeated testing, preferences strengthened, but the first evaluation accurately estimated the direction and significance of preference. In addition, dogs typically (89% of the time) consumed more of the food they chose first, suggesting they did not need to taste each food to choose. Our odor preference olfactometer assessment, however, did not reveal odor preferences other than that dogs preferred to sniff a food odor over clean air. Further work will be needed to identify methods of measuring odor preferences amongst food odors for dogs, but the modified 2-bowl test shows promise for further testing in pet dogs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5863557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58635572018-03-29 Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study Hall, Nathaniel J. Péron, Franck Cambou, Stéphanie Callejon, Laurence Wynne, Clive D.L. Chem Senses Original Article Evaluation of food palatability and preference is of great importance to the pet food industry. One common technique for evaluating palatability is a 2-bowl test in which 2 products are offered simultaneously and food consumption is measured. This yields clear results with dogs trained to routinely conduct such comparisons, but it is less clear how this extends to untrained pet dogs. In addition, prior research indicates that olfaction is important in food preference, but methods for evaluating odor preference in canines are currently lacking. In this study, we developed a modified 2-bowl test for evaluation of food preferences in pet dogs with minimal training, and an olfactometer technique for the evaluation of odor preferences. In our 2-bowl procedure, we observed clear preferences among 4 commercial food products in 6 pet dogs. Across repeated testing, preferences strengthened, but the first evaluation accurately estimated the direction and significance of preference. In addition, dogs typically (89% of the time) consumed more of the food they chose first, suggesting they did not need to taste each food to choose. Our odor preference olfactometer assessment, however, did not reveal odor preferences other than that dogs preferred to sniff a food odor over clean air. Further work will be needed to identify methods of measuring odor preferences amongst food odors for dogs, but the modified 2-bowl test shows promise for further testing in pet dogs. Oxford University Press 2017-05 2017-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5863557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx016 Text en © The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hall, Nathaniel J. Péron, Franck Cambou, Stéphanie Callejon, Laurence Wynne, Clive D.L. Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study |
title | Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study |
title_full | Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study |
title_fullStr | Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study |
title_short | Food and Food-Odor Preferences in Dogs: A Pilot Study |
title_sort | food and food-odor preferences in dogs: a pilot study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5863557/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chemse/bjx016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hallnathanielj foodandfoododorpreferencesindogsapilotstudy AT peronfranck foodandfoododorpreferencesindogsapilotstudy AT camboustephanie foodandfoododorpreferencesindogsapilotstudy AT callejonlaurence foodandfoododorpreferencesindogsapilotstudy AT wynneclivedl foodandfoododorpreferencesindogsapilotstudy |