Cargando…

Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies

The information on microbiota composition in the human gastrointestinal tract predominantly originates from the analyses of human faeces by application of next generation sequencing (NGS). However, the detected composition of the faecal bacterial community can be affected by various factors includin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panek, Marina, Čipčić Paljetak, Hana, Barešić, Anja, Perić, Mihaela, Matijašić, Mario, Lojkić, Ivana, Vranešić Bender, Darija, Krznarić, Željko, Verbanac, Donatella
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23296-4
_version_ 1783308640934952960
author Panek, Marina
Čipčić Paljetak, Hana
Barešić, Anja
Perić, Mihaela
Matijašić, Mario
Lojkić, Ivana
Vranešić Bender, Darija
Krznarić, Željko
Verbanac, Donatella
author_facet Panek, Marina
Čipčić Paljetak, Hana
Barešić, Anja
Perić, Mihaela
Matijašić, Mario
Lojkić, Ivana
Vranešić Bender, Darija
Krznarić, Željko
Verbanac, Donatella
author_sort Panek, Marina
collection PubMed
description The information on microbiota composition in the human gastrointestinal tract predominantly originates from the analyses of human faeces by application of next generation sequencing (NGS). However, the detected composition of the faecal bacterial community can be affected by various factors including experimental design and procedures. This study evaluated the performance of different protocols for collection and storage of faecal samples (native and OMNIgene.GUT system) and bacterial DNA extraction (MP Biomedicals, QIAGEN and MO BIO kits), using two NGS platforms for 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Ilumina MiSeq and Ion Torrent PGM). OMNIgene.GUT proved as a reliable and convenient system for collection and storage of faecal samples although favouring Sutterella genus. MP provided superior DNA yield and quality, MO BIO depleted Gram positive organisms while using QIAGEN with OMNIgene.GUT resulted in greatest variability compared to other two kits. MiSeq and IT platforms in their supplier recommended setups provided comparable reproducibility of donor faecal microbiota. The differences included higher diversity observed with MiSeq and increased capacity of MiSeq to detect Akkermansia muciniphila, [Odoribacteraceae], Erysipelotrichaceae and Ruminococcaceae (primarily Faecalibacterium prausnitzii). The results of our study could assist the investigators using NGS technologies to make informed decisions on appropriate tools for their experimental pipelines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5865204
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58652042018-03-27 Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies Panek, Marina Čipčić Paljetak, Hana Barešić, Anja Perić, Mihaela Matijašić, Mario Lojkić, Ivana Vranešić Bender, Darija Krznarić, Željko Verbanac, Donatella Sci Rep Article The information on microbiota composition in the human gastrointestinal tract predominantly originates from the analyses of human faeces by application of next generation sequencing (NGS). However, the detected composition of the faecal bacterial community can be affected by various factors including experimental design and procedures. This study evaluated the performance of different protocols for collection and storage of faecal samples (native and OMNIgene.GUT system) and bacterial DNA extraction (MP Biomedicals, QIAGEN and MO BIO kits), using two NGS platforms for 16S rRNA gene sequencing (Ilumina MiSeq and Ion Torrent PGM). OMNIgene.GUT proved as a reliable and convenient system for collection and storage of faecal samples although favouring Sutterella genus. MP provided superior DNA yield and quality, MO BIO depleted Gram positive organisms while using QIAGEN with OMNIgene.GUT resulted in greatest variability compared to other two kits. MiSeq and IT platforms in their supplier recommended setups provided comparable reproducibility of donor faecal microbiota. The differences included higher diversity observed with MiSeq and increased capacity of MiSeq to detect Akkermansia muciniphila, [Odoribacteraceae], Erysipelotrichaceae and Ruminococcaceae (primarily Faecalibacterium prausnitzii). The results of our study could assist the investigators using NGS technologies to make informed decisions on appropriate tools for their experimental pipelines. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5865204/ /pubmed/29572539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23296-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Panek, Marina
Čipčić Paljetak, Hana
Barešić, Anja
Perić, Mihaela
Matijašić, Mario
Lojkić, Ivana
Vranešić Bender, Darija
Krznarić, Željko
Verbanac, Donatella
Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies
title Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies
title_full Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies
title_fullStr Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies
title_full_unstemmed Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies
title_short Methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, DNA extraction and next generation sequencing technologies
title_sort methodology challenges in studying human gut microbiota – effects of collection, storage, dna extraction and next generation sequencing technologies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5865204/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29572539
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23296-4
work_keys_str_mv AT panekmarina methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT cipcicpaljetakhana methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT baresicanja methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT pericmihaela methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT matijasicmario methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT lojkicivana methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT vranesicbenderdarija methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT krznariczeljko methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies
AT verbanacdonatella methodologychallengesinstudyinghumangutmicrobiotaeffectsofcollectionstoragednaextractionandnextgenerationsequencingtechnologies