Cargando…

Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans

Cryptococcus neoformans successfully replicates in low glucose in infected patients. In the serotype A strain, H99, growth in this condition prolongs lifespan regulated by SIR2, and can be modulated with SIR2-specific drugs. Previous studies show that lifespan modulation of a cryptococcal population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bouklas, Tejas, Masone, Lindsey, Fries, Bettina C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29463010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof4010026
_version_ 1783309813776646144
author Bouklas, Tejas
Masone, Lindsey
Fries, Bettina C.
author_facet Bouklas, Tejas
Masone, Lindsey
Fries, Bettina C.
author_sort Bouklas, Tejas
collection PubMed
description Cryptococcus neoformans successfully replicates in low glucose in infected patients. In the serotype A strain, H99, growth in this condition prolongs lifespan regulated by SIR2, and can be modulated with SIR2-specific drugs. Previous studies show that lifespan modulation of a cryptococcal population affects its sensitivity to antifungals, and survival in an infection model. Sirtuins and their role in longevity are conserved among fungi; however, the effect of glucose starvation is not confirmed even in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lifespan analysis of C. neoformans strains in low glucose showed that 37.5% exhibited pro-longevity, and lifespan of a serotype D strain, RC2, was shortened. Transcriptome comparison of H99 and RC2 under calorie restriction demonstrated differences, confirmed by real-time PCR showing that SIR2, TOR1, SCH9, and PKA1 expression correlated with lifespan response to calorie restriction. As expected, RC2-sir2Δ cells exhibited a shortened lifespan, which was reconstituted. However, shortened lifespan from calorie restriction was independent of SIR2. In contrast to H99 but consistent with altered SIR2 regulation, SIR2-specific drugs did not affect outcome of RC2 infection. These data suggest that SIR2 regulation and response to calorie restriction varies in C. neoformans, which should be considered when Sirtuins are investigated as potential therapy targets for fungal infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872329
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58723292018-03-30 Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans Bouklas, Tejas Masone, Lindsey Fries, Bettina C. J Fungi (Basel) Article Cryptococcus neoformans successfully replicates in low glucose in infected patients. In the serotype A strain, H99, growth in this condition prolongs lifespan regulated by SIR2, and can be modulated with SIR2-specific drugs. Previous studies show that lifespan modulation of a cryptococcal population affects its sensitivity to antifungals, and survival in an infection model. Sirtuins and their role in longevity are conserved among fungi; however, the effect of glucose starvation is not confirmed even in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lifespan analysis of C. neoformans strains in low glucose showed that 37.5% exhibited pro-longevity, and lifespan of a serotype D strain, RC2, was shortened. Transcriptome comparison of H99 and RC2 under calorie restriction demonstrated differences, confirmed by real-time PCR showing that SIR2, TOR1, SCH9, and PKA1 expression correlated with lifespan response to calorie restriction. As expected, RC2-sir2Δ cells exhibited a shortened lifespan, which was reconstituted. However, shortened lifespan from calorie restriction was independent of SIR2. In contrast to H99 but consistent with altered SIR2 regulation, SIR2-specific drugs did not affect outcome of RC2 infection. These data suggest that SIR2 regulation and response to calorie restriction varies in C. neoformans, which should be considered when Sirtuins are investigated as potential therapy targets for fungal infections. MDPI 2018-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5872329/ /pubmed/29463010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof4010026 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bouklas, Tejas
Masone, Lindsey
Fries, Bettina C.
Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
title Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
title_full Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
title_fullStr Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
title_short Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
title_sort differences in sirtuin regulation in response to calorie restriction in cryptococcus neoformans
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872329/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29463010
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof4010026
work_keys_str_mv AT bouklastejas differencesinsirtuinregulationinresponsetocalorierestrictionincryptococcusneoformans
AT masonelindsey differencesinsirtuinregulationinresponsetocalorierestrictionincryptococcusneoformans
AT friesbettinac differencesinsirtuinregulationinresponsetocalorierestrictionincryptococcusneoformans