Cargando…
Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans
Cryptococcus neoformans successfully replicates in low glucose in infected patients. In the serotype A strain, H99, growth in this condition prolongs lifespan regulated by SIR2, and can be modulated with SIR2-specific drugs. Previous studies show that lifespan modulation of a cryptococcal population...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29463010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof4010026 |
_version_ | 1783309813776646144 |
---|---|
author | Bouklas, Tejas Masone, Lindsey Fries, Bettina C. |
author_facet | Bouklas, Tejas Masone, Lindsey Fries, Bettina C. |
author_sort | Bouklas, Tejas |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cryptococcus neoformans successfully replicates in low glucose in infected patients. In the serotype A strain, H99, growth in this condition prolongs lifespan regulated by SIR2, and can be modulated with SIR2-specific drugs. Previous studies show that lifespan modulation of a cryptococcal population affects its sensitivity to antifungals, and survival in an infection model. Sirtuins and their role in longevity are conserved among fungi; however, the effect of glucose starvation is not confirmed even in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lifespan analysis of C. neoformans strains in low glucose showed that 37.5% exhibited pro-longevity, and lifespan of a serotype D strain, RC2, was shortened. Transcriptome comparison of H99 and RC2 under calorie restriction demonstrated differences, confirmed by real-time PCR showing that SIR2, TOR1, SCH9, and PKA1 expression correlated with lifespan response to calorie restriction. As expected, RC2-sir2Δ cells exhibited a shortened lifespan, which was reconstituted. However, shortened lifespan from calorie restriction was independent of SIR2. In contrast to H99 but consistent with altered SIR2 regulation, SIR2-specific drugs did not affect outcome of RC2 infection. These data suggest that SIR2 regulation and response to calorie restriction varies in C. neoformans, which should be considered when Sirtuins are investigated as potential therapy targets for fungal infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5872329 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-58723292018-03-30 Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans Bouklas, Tejas Masone, Lindsey Fries, Bettina C. J Fungi (Basel) Article Cryptococcus neoformans successfully replicates in low glucose in infected patients. In the serotype A strain, H99, growth in this condition prolongs lifespan regulated by SIR2, and can be modulated with SIR2-specific drugs. Previous studies show that lifespan modulation of a cryptococcal population affects its sensitivity to antifungals, and survival in an infection model. Sirtuins and their role in longevity are conserved among fungi; however, the effect of glucose starvation is not confirmed even in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lifespan analysis of C. neoformans strains in low glucose showed that 37.5% exhibited pro-longevity, and lifespan of a serotype D strain, RC2, was shortened. Transcriptome comparison of H99 and RC2 under calorie restriction demonstrated differences, confirmed by real-time PCR showing that SIR2, TOR1, SCH9, and PKA1 expression correlated with lifespan response to calorie restriction. As expected, RC2-sir2Δ cells exhibited a shortened lifespan, which was reconstituted. However, shortened lifespan from calorie restriction was independent of SIR2. In contrast to H99 but consistent with altered SIR2 regulation, SIR2-specific drugs did not affect outcome of RC2 infection. These data suggest that SIR2 regulation and response to calorie restriction varies in C. neoformans, which should be considered when Sirtuins are investigated as potential therapy targets for fungal infections. MDPI 2018-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5872329/ /pubmed/29463010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof4010026 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bouklas, Tejas Masone, Lindsey Fries, Bettina C. Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans |
title | Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans |
title_full | Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans |
title_fullStr | Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans |
title_short | Differences in Sirtuin Regulation in Response to Calorie Restriction in Cryptococcus neoformans |
title_sort | differences in sirtuin regulation in response to calorie restriction in cryptococcus neoformans |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872329/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29463010 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jof4010026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bouklastejas differencesinsirtuinregulationinresponsetocalorierestrictionincryptococcusneoformans AT masonelindsey differencesinsirtuinregulationinresponsetocalorierestrictionincryptococcusneoformans AT friesbettinac differencesinsirtuinregulationinresponsetocalorierestrictionincryptococcusneoformans |