Cargando…

Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes

The current review examined published data on the intake of all major low-/no-calorie sweeteners—aspartame, acesulfame-K, saccharin, sucralose, cyclamate, thaumatin and steviol glycosides—globally over the last decade. The most detailed and complex exposure assessments were conducted in Europe, foll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martyn, Danika, Darch, Maryse, Roberts, Ashley, Lee, Han Youl, Yaqiong Tian, Tina, Kaburagi, Naoko, Belmar, Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543782
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10030357
_version_ 1783309912055480320
author Martyn, Danika
Darch, Maryse
Roberts, Ashley
Lee, Han Youl
Yaqiong Tian, Tina
Kaburagi, Naoko
Belmar, Pablo
author_facet Martyn, Danika
Darch, Maryse
Roberts, Ashley
Lee, Han Youl
Yaqiong Tian, Tina
Kaburagi, Naoko
Belmar, Pablo
author_sort Martyn, Danika
collection PubMed
description The current review examined published data on the intake of all major low-/no-calorie sweeteners—aspartame, acesulfame-K, saccharin, sucralose, cyclamate, thaumatin and steviol glycosides—globally over the last decade. The most detailed and complex exposure assessments were conducted in Europe, following a standardized approach. Japan and Korea similarly had up-to-date and regular intake data available. The data for other Asian countries, Latin America, Australia/New Zealand and global estimates, evaluated by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), while available, were shown to be more limited in terms of design. Overall, the studies conducted since 2008 raised no concerns with respect to exceedance of individual sweetener acceptable daily intake (ADIs) among the general population globally. The data identified do not suggest a shift in exposure over time, with several studies indicating a reduction in intake. However, some data suggest there may have been an increase in the numbers of consumers of low-/no-calorie-sweetened products. Future research should consider a more standardized approach to allow the monitoring of potential changes in exposure based upon events such as sugar reduction recommendations, to ensure there is no shift in intake, particularly for high-risk individuals, including diabetics and children with specific dietary requirements, and to ensure risk management decisions are based on quality intake analyses.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5872775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58727752018-03-30 Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes Martyn, Danika Darch, Maryse Roberts, Ashley Lee, Han Youl Yaqiong Tian, Tina Kaburagi, Naoko Belmar, Pablo Nutrients Review The current review examined published data on the intake of all major low-/no-calorie sweeteners—aspartame, acesulfame-K, saccharin, sucralose, cyclamate, thaumatin and steviol glycosides—globally over the last decade. The most detailed and complex exposure assessments were conducted in Europe, following a standardized approach. Japan and Korea similarly had up-to-date and regular intake data available. The data for other Asian countries, Latin America, Australia/New Zealand and global estimates, evaluated by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA), while available, were shown to be more limited in terms of design. Overall, the studies conducted since 2008 raised no concerns with respect to exceedance of individual sweetener acceptable daily intake (ADIs) among the general population globally. The data identified do not suggest a shift in exposure over time, with several studies indicating a reduction in intake. However, some data suggest there may have been an increase in the numbers of consumers of low-/no-calorie-sweetened products. Future research should consider a more standardized approach to allow the monitoring of potential changes in exposure based upon events such as sugar reduction recommendations, to ensure there is no shift in intake, particularly for high-risk individuals, including diabetics and children with specific dietary requirements, and to ensure risk management decisions are based on quality intake analyses. MDPI 2018-03-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5872775/ /pubmed/29543782 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10030357 Text en © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Martyn, Danika
Darch, Maryse
Roberts, Ashley
Lee, Han Youl
Yaqiong Tian, Tina
Kaburagi, Naoko
Belmar, Pablo
Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes
title Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes
title_full Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes
title_fullStr Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes
title_full_unstemmed Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes
title_short Low-/No-Calorie Sweeteners: A Review of Global Intakes
title_sort low-/no-calorie sweeteners: a review of global intakes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5872775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29543782
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu10030357
work_keys_str_mv AT martyndanika lownocaloriesweetenersareviewofglobalintakes
AT darchmaryse lownocaloriesweetenersareviewofglobalintakes
AT robertsashley lownocaloriesweetenersareviewofglobalintakes
AT leehanyoul lownocaloriesweetenersareviewofglobalintakes
AT yaqiongtiantina lownocaloriesweetenersareviewofglobalintakes
AT kaburaginaoko lownocaloriesweetenersareviewofglobalintakes
AT belmarpablo lownocaloriesweetenersareviewofglobalintakes