Cargando…

Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure

We investigate the pressure-dependent mechanical behaviour of the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-4 (M(im)(2); M(2+) = Co(2+) or Zn(2+), im(–) = imidazolate) with high pressure, synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction and mercury intrusion measurements. A displacive phase transition from a highly co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Henke, Sebastian, Wharmby, Michael T., Kieslich, Gregor, Hante, Inke, Schneemann, Andreas, Wu, Yue, Daisenberger, Dominik, Cheetham, Anthony K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal Society of Chemistry 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29675212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04952h
_version_ 1783312399494807552
author Henke, Sebastian
Wharmby, Michael T.
Kieslich, Gregor
Hante, Inke
Schneemann, Andreas
Wu, Yue
Daisenberger, Dominik
Cheetham, Anthony K.
author_facet Henke, Sebastian
Wharmby, Michael T.
Kieslich, Gregor
Hante, Inke
Schneemann, Andreas
Wu, Yue
Daisenberger, Dominik
Cheetham, Anthony K.
author_sort Henke, Sebastian
collection PubMed
description We investigate the pressure-dependent mechanical behaviour of the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-4 (M(im)(2); M(2+) = Co(2+) or Zn(2+), im(–) = imidazolate) with high pressure, synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction and mercury intrusion measurements. A displacive phase transition from a highly compressible open pore (op) phase with continuous porosity (space group Pbca, bulk modulus ∼1.4 GPa) to a closed pore (cp) phase with inaccessible porosity (space group P2(1)/c, bulk modulus ∼3.3–4.9 GPa) is triggered by the application of mechanical pressure. Over the course of the transitions, both ZIF-4 materials contract by about 20% in volume. However, the threshold pressure, the reversibility and the immediate repeatability of the phase transition depend on the metal cation. ZIF-4(Zn) undergoes the op–cp phase transition at a hydrostatic mechanical pressure of only 28 MPa, while ZIF-4(Co) requires about 50 MPa to initiate the transition. Interestingly, ZIF-4(Co) fully returns to the op phase after decompression, whereas ZIF-4(Zn) remains in the cp phase after pressure release and requires subsequent heating to switch back to the op phase. These variations in high pressure behaviour can be rationalised on the basis of the different electron configurations of the respective M(2+) ions (3d(10) for Zn(2+) and 3d(7) for Co(2+)). Our results present the first examples of op–cp phase transitions (i.e. breathing transitions) of ZIFs driven by mechanical pressure and suggest potential applications of these functional materials as shock absorbers, nanodampers, or in mechanocalorics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5887855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58878552018-04-19 Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure Henke, Sebastian Wharmby, Michael T. Kieslich, Gregor Hante, Inke Schneemann, Andreas Wu, Yue Daisenberger, Dominik Cheetham, Anthony K. Chem Sci Chemistry We investigate the pressure-dependent mechanical behaviour of the zeolitic imidazolate framework ZIF-4 (M(im)(2); M(2+) = Co(2+) or Zn(2+), im(–) = imidazolate) with high pressure, synchrotron powder X-ray diffraction and mercury intrusion measurements. A displacive phase transition from a highly compressible open pore (op) phase with continuous porosity (space group Pbca, bulk modulus ∼1.4 GPa) to a closed pore (cp) phase with inaccessible porosity (space group P2(1)/c, bulk modulus ∼3.3–4.9 GPa) is triggered by the application of mechanical pressure. Over the course of the transitions, both ZIF-4 materials contract by about 20% in volume. However, the threshold pressure, the reversibility and the immediate repeatability of the phase transition depend on the metal cation. ZIF-4(Zn) undergoes the op–cp phase transition at a hydrostatic mechanical pressure of only 28 MPa, while ZIF-4(Co) requires about 50 MPa to initiate the transition. Interestingly, ZIF-4(Co) fully returns to the op phase after decompression, whereas ZIF-4(Zn) remains in the cp phase after pressure release and requires subsequent heating to switch back to the op phase. These variations in high pressure behaviour can be rationalised on the basis of the different electron configurations of the respective M(2+) ions (3d(10) for Zn(2+) and 3d(7) for Co(2+)). Our results present the first examples of op–cp phase transitions (i.e. breathing transitions) of ZIFs driven by mechanical pressure and suggest potential applications of these functional materials as shock absorbers, nanodampers, or in mechanocalorics. Royal Society of Chemistry 2018-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC5887855/ /pubmed/29675212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04952h Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is freely available. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence (CC BY-NC 3.0)
spellingShingle Chemistry
Henke, Sebastian
Wharmby, Michael T.
Kieslich, Gregor
Hante, Inke
Schneemann, Andreas
Wu, Yue
Daisenberger, Dominik
Cheetham, Anthony K.
Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure
title Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure
title_full Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure
title_fullStr Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure
title_full_unstemmed Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure
title_short Pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure
title_sort pore closure in zeolitic imidazolate frameworks under mechanical pressure
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5887855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29675212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c7sc04952h
work_keys_str_mv AT henkesebastian poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure
AT wharmbymichaelt poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure
AT kieslichgregor poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure
AT hanteinke poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure
AT schneemannandreas poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure
AT wuyue poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure
AT daisenbergerdominik poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure
AT cheethamanthonyk poreclosureinzeoliticimidazolateframeworksundermechanicalpressure