Cargando…

Synthesis and substrate properties towards HIV-1 reverse transcriptase of new diphosphate analogues of 9-[(2-phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]adenine

BACKGROUND: The replacement of β,γ-pyrophosphate by β,γ-phosphonate moieties within the triphosphate chain of 5′-triphosphate nucleoside analogues was previously studied for various antiviral nucleoside analogues such as AZT and 2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides. Thus, it has been shown that these chemical m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laux, Wolfgang HG, Priet, Stéphane, Alvarez, Karine, Peyrottes, Suzanne, Périgaud, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5890543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29436843
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2040206618757636
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The replacement of β,γ-pyrophosphate by β,γ-phosphonate moieties within the triphosphate chain of 5′-triphosphate nucleoside analogues was previously studied for various antiviral nucleoside analogues such as AZT and 2′,3′-dideoxynucleosides. Thus, it has been shown that these chemical modifications could preserve, in some cases, the terminating substrate properties of the triphosphate analogue for HIV-RT. Herein, we aimed to study such 5′-triphosphate mimics based on the scaffold of the well-known antiviral agent 9-[(2-phosphonomethoxy)ethyl]adenine (PMEA, Adefovir). METHODS: Synthesis involved coupling of a morpholidate derivative of PMEA with appropriate pyrophosphoryl analogues. The relative efficiencies of incorporation of the studied diphosphate phosphonates were measured using subtype B WT HIV-1 RT in an in vitro susceptibility assay, in comparison to the parent nucleotide analogue (PMEApp). RESULTS: Searching for nucleoside 5′-triphosphate mimics, we have synthesized and studied a series of diphosphate analogues of PMEA bearing non hydrolysable bonds between the and phosphorus atoms. We also examined their relative inhibitory capacity towards HIV-1 reverse transcriptase in comparison to the parent nucleotide analogue (PMEApp). Only one of them appeared as a weak inhibitor (IC(50) = 403.0 ± 75.5 µM) and proved to be less effective than PMEApp (IC(50) = 6.4 ± 0.8 µM). CONCLUSION: PMEA diphosphoryl derivatives were designed as potential substrates and/or inhibitors of various viral polymerases. These modifications dramatically affect their ability to inhibit HIV-RT.