Cargando…

Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters

Enumeration of circulating microvesicles (MVs) by conventional flow cytometry is accomplished by the addition of a known amount of counting beads and calculated from the formula: MV/μl = (MV count/bead count) × final bead concentration. We sought to optimize each variable in the equation by determin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alkhatatbeh, Mohammad J, Enjeti, Anoop K, Baqar, Sara, Ekinci, Elif I, Liu, Dorothy, Thorne, Rick F, Lincz, Lisa F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1849454418766966
_version_ 1783313563431993344
author Alkhatatbeh, Mohammad J
Enjeti, Anoop K
Baqar, Sara
Ekinci, Elif I
Liu, Dorothy
Thorne, Rick F
Lincz, Lisa F
author_facet Alkhatatbeh, Mohammad J
Enjeti, Anoop K
Baqar, Sara
Ekinci, Elif I
Liu, Dorothy
Thorne, Rick F
Lincz, Lisa F
author_sort Alkhatatbeh, Mohammad J
collection PubMed
description Enumeration of circulating microvesicles (MVs) by conventional flow cytometry is accomplished by the addition of a known amount of counting beads and calculated from the formula: MV/μl = (MV count/bead count) × final bead concentration. We sought to optimize each variable in the equation by determining the best parameters for detecting ‘MV count’ and examining the effects of different bead preparations and concentrations on the final calculation. Three commercially available bead preparations (TruCount, Flow-Count and CountBright) were tested, and MV detection on a BD FACSCanto was optimized for gating by either forward scatter (FSC) or side scatter (SSC); the results were compared by calculating different subsets of MV on a series of 74 typical patient plasma samples. The relationship between the number of beads added to each test and the number of beads counted by flow cytometry remained linear over a wide range of bead concentrations (R (2) ≥ 0.997). However, TruCount beads produced the most consistent (concentration variation = 3.8%) calculated numbers of plasma CD41(+)/Annexin V(+) MV, which were significantly higher from that calculated using either Flow-Count or CountBright (p < 0.001). The FACSCanto was able to resolve 0.5 μm beads by FSC and 0.16 μm beads by SSC, but there were significantly more background events using SSC compared with FSC (3113 vs. 470; p = 0.008). In general, sample analysis by SSC resulted in significantly higher numbers of MV (p < 0.0001) but was well correlated with enumeration by FSC for all MV subtypes (ρ = 0.62–0.89, p < 0.0001). We conclude that all counting beads provided linear results at concentrations ranging from 6 beads/μl to 100 beads/μl, but TruCount was the most consistent. Using SSC to gate MV events produced high background which negatively affected counting bead enumeration and overall MV calculations. Strategies to reduce SSC background should be employed in order to reliably use this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5894907
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-58949072018-04-16 Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters Alkhatatbeh, Mohammad J Enjeti, Anoop K Baqar, Sara Ekinci, Elif I Liu, Dorothy Thorne, Rick F Lincz, Lisa F J Circ Biomark Report Enumeration of circulating microvesicles (MVs) by conventional flow cytometry is accomplished by the addition of a known amount of counting beads and calculated from the formula: MV/μl = (MV count/bead count) × final bead concentration. We sought to optimize each variable in the equation by determining the best parameters for detecting ‘MV count’ and examining the effects of different bead preparations and concentrations on the final calculation. Three commercially available bead preparations (TruCount, Flow-Count and CountBright) were tested, and MV detection on a BD FACSCanto was optimized for gating by either forward scatter (FSC) or side scatter (SSC); the results were compared by calculating different subsets of MV on a series of 74 typical patient plasma samples. The relationship between the number of beads added to each test and the number of beads counted by flow cytometry remained linear over a wide range of bead concentrations (R (2) ≥ 0.997). However, TruCount beads produced the most consistent (concentration variation = 3.8%) calculated numbers of plasma CD41(+)/Annexin V(+) MV, which were significantly higher from that calculated using either Flow-Count or CountBright (p < 0.001). The FACSCanto was able to resolve 0.5 μm beads by FSC and 0.16 μm beads by SSC, but there were significantly more background events using SSC compared with FSC (3113 vs. 470; p = 0.008). In general, sample analysis by SSC resulted in significantly higher numbers of MV (p < 0.0001) but was well correlated with enumeration by FSC for all MV subtypes (ρ = 0.62–0.89, p < 0.0001). We conclude that all counting beads provided linear results at concentrations ranging from 6 beads/μl to 100 beads/μl, but TruCount was the most consistent. Using SSC to gate MV events produced high background which negatively affected counting bead enumeration and overall MV calculations. Strategies to reduce SSC background should be employed in order to reliably use this technique. SAGE Publications 2018-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5894907/ /pubmed/29662552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1849454418766966 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Report
Alkhatatbeh, Mohammad J
Enjeti, Anoop K
Baqar, Sara
Ekinci, Elif I
Liu, Dorothy
Thorne, Rick F
Lincz, Lisa F
Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters
title Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters
title_full Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters
title_fullStr Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters
title_short Strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: Counting beads and scatter parameters
title_sort strategies for enumeration of circulating microvesicles on a conventional flow cytometer: counting beads and scatter parameters
topic Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5894907/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29662552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1849454418766966
work_keys_str_mv AT alkhatatbehmohammadj strategiesforenumerationofcirculatingmicrovesiclesonaconventionalflowcytometercountingbeadsandscatterparameters
AT enjetianoopk strategiesforenumerationofcirculatingmicrovesiclesonaconventionalflowcytometercountingbeadsandscatterparameters
AT baqarsara strategiesforenumerationofcirculatingmicrovesiclesonaconventionalflowcytometercountingbeadsandscatterparameters
AT ekincielifi strategiesforenumerationofcirculatingmicrovesiclesonaconventionalflowcytometercountingbeadsandscatterparameters
AT liudorothy strategiesforenumerationofcirculatingmicrovesiclesonaconventionalflowcytometercountingbeadsandscatterparameters
AT thornerickf strategiesforenumerationofcirculatingmicrovesiclesonaconventionalflowcytometercountingbeadsandscatterparameters
AT linczlisaf strategiesforenumerationofcirculatingmicrovesiclesonaconventionalflowcytometercountingbeadsandscatterparameters