Cargando…

Synthesis and preclinical evaluation of novel (18)F-labeled Glu-urea-Glu-based PSMA inhibitors for prostate cancer imaging: a comparison with (18)F-DCFPyl and (18)F-PSMA-1007

BACKGROUND: Due to its high and consistent expression in prostate cancer (PCa), the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) represents an ideal target for molecular imaging and targeted therapy using highly specific radiolabeled PSMA ligands. To address the continuously growing clinical demand for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Robu, Stephanie, Schmidt, Alexander, Eiber, Matthias, Schottelius, Margret, Günther, Thomas, Hooshyar Yousefi, Behrooz, Schwaiger, Markus, Wester, Hans-Jürgen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5897267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29651565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-018-0382-8
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Due to its high and consistent expression in prostate cancer (PCa), the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) represents an ideal target for molecular imaging and targeted therapy using highly specific radiolabeled PSMA ligands. To address the continuously growing clinical demand for (18)F-labeled PSMA-probes, we developed two novel Glu-urea-Glu-(EuE)-based inhibitors, EuE-k-(18)F-FBOA (1) and EuE-k-β-a-(18)F-FPyl (2), both with optimized linker structure and different (18)F-labeled aromatic moieties. The inhibitors were evaluated in a comparative preclinical study with (18)F-DCFPyl and (18)F-PSMA-1007. RESULTS: Radiolabeling procedures allowed preparation of (1) and (2) with high radiochemical yields (67 ± 7 and 53 ± 7%, d.c.) and purity (> 98%). When compared with (18)F-DCFPyl (IC(50) = 12.3 ± 1.2 nM) and (18)F-PSMA-1007 (IC(50) = 4.2 ± 0.5 nM), both metabolically stable EuE-based ligands showed commensurable or higher PSMA affinity (IC(50) = 4.2 ± 0.4 nM (1), IC(50) = 1.1 ± 0.2 nM (2)). Moreover, 1.4- and 2.7-fold higher internalization rates were observed for (1) and (2), respectively, resulting in markedly enhanced tumor accumulation in LNCaP-tumor-bearing mice ((1) 12.7 ± 2.0% IA/g, (2) 13.0° ± 1.0% IA/g vs. 7.3 ± 1.0% IA/g ((18)F-DCFPyl), 7.1 ± 1.5% IA/g ((18)F-PSMA-1007), 1 h p.i.). In contrast to (1), (2) showed higher kidney accumulation and delayed clearance kinetics. Due to the high hydrophilicity of both compounds, almost no unspecific uptake in non-target tissue was observed. In contrast, due to the less hydrophilic character (logP = − 1.6) and high plasma protein binding (98%), (18)F-PSMA-1007 showed uptake in non-target tissue and predominantly hepatobiliary excretion, whereas, (18)F-DCFPyl exhibited pharmacokinetics quite similar to those obtained with (1) and (2). CONCLUSION: Both (18)F-labeled EuE-based PSMA ligands showed excellent in vitro and in vivo PSMA-targeting characteristics. The substantially higher tumor accumulation in mice compared to recently introduced (18)F-PSMA-1007 and (18)F-DCFPyl suggests their high value for preclinical studies investigating the effects on PSMA-expression. In contrast to (2), (1) seems to be more promising for further investigation, due to the more reliable (18)F-labeling procedure, the faster clearance kinetics with comparable high tumor uptake, resulting therefore in better high-contrast microPET imaging as early as 1 h p.i. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13550-018-0382-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.