Cargando…

Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene

The human C-C chemokine receptor type-5 (CCR5) is the major transmembrane co-receptor that mediates HIV-1 entry into target CD4+ cells. Gene therapy to knock-out the CCR5 gene has shown encouraging results in providing a functional cure for HIV-1 infection. In gene therapy strategies, the initial re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nerys-Junior, Arildo, Braga-Dias, Luciene P., Pezzuto, Paula, Cotta-de-Almeida, Vinícius, Tanuri, Amilcar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sociedade Brasileira de Genética 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5901495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29583154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0065
_version_ 1783314625251508224
author Nerys-Junior, Arildo
Braga-Dias, Luciene P.
Pezzuto, Paula
Cotta-de-Almeida, Vinícius
Tanuri, Amilcar
author_facet Nerys-Junior, Arildo
Braga-Dias, Luciene P.
Pezzuto, Paula
Cotta-de-Almeida, Vinícius
Tanuri, Amilcar
author_sort Nerys-Junior, Arildo
collection PubMed
description The human C-C chemokine receptor type-5 (CCR5) is the major transmembrane co-receptor that mediates HIV-1 entry into target CD4+ cells. Gene therapy to knock-out the CCR5 gene has shown encouraging results in providing a functional cure for HIV-1 infection. In gene therapy strategies, the initial region of the CCR5 gene is a hotspot for producing functional gene knock-out. Such target gene editing can be done using programmable endonucleases such as transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9). These two gene editing approaches are the most modern and effective tools for precise gene modification. However, little is known of potential differences in the efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 for editing the beginning of the CCR5 gene. To examine which of these two methods is best for gene therapy, we compared the patterns and amount of editing at the beginning of the CCR5 gene using TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 followed by DNA sequencing. This comparison revealed that CRISPR-Cas9 mediated the sorting of cells that contained 4.8 times more gene editing than TALEN+ transfected cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5901495
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Genética
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59014952018-04-23 Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene Nerys-Junior, Arildo Braga-Dias, Luciene P. Pezzuto, Paula Cotta-de-Almeida, Vinícius Tanuri, Amilcar Genet Mol Biol Genomics and Bioinformatics The human C-C chemokine receptor type-5 (CCR5) is the major transmembrane co-receptor that mediates HIV-1 entry into target CD4+ cells. Gene therapy to knock-out the CCR5 gene has shown encouraging results in providing a functional cure for HIV-1 infection. In gene therapy strategies, the initial region of the CCR5 gene is a hotspot for producing functional gene knock-out. Such target gene editing can be done using programmable endonucleases such as transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALEN) or clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9). These two gene editing approaches are the most modern and effective tools for precise gene modification. However, little is known of potential differences in the efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 for editing the beginning of the CCR5 gene. To examine which of these two methods is best for gene therapy, we compared the patterns and amount of editing at the beginning of the CCR5 gene using TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 followed by DNA sequencing. This comparison revealed that CRISPR-Cas9 mediated the sorting of cells that contained 4.8 times more gene editing than TALEN+ transfected cells. Sociedade Brasileira de Genética 2018-03-19 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5901495/ /pubmed/29583154 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0065 Text en Copyright © 2018, Sociedade Brasileira de Genética. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License information: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (type CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited.
spellingShingle Genomics and Bioinformatics
Nerys-Junior, Arildo
Braga-Dias, Luciene P.
Pezzuto, Paula
Cotta-de-Almeida, Vinícius
Tanuri, Amilcar
Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene
title Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene
title_full Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene
title_fullStr Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene
title_short Comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of TALEN and CRISPR-Cas9 when targeting the human CCR5 gene
title_sort comparison of the editing patterns and editing efficiencies of talen and crispr-cas9 when targeting the human ccr5 gene
topic Genomics and Bioinformatics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5901495/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29583154
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2017-0065
work_keys_str_mv AT nerysjuniorarildo comparisonoftheeditingpatternsandeditingefficienciesoftalenandcrisprcas9whentargetingthehumanccr5gene
AT bragadiaslucienep comparisonoftheeditingpatternsandeditingefficienciesoftalenandcrisprcas9whentargetingthehumanccr5gene
AT pezzutopaula comparisonoftheeditingpatternsandeditingefficienciesoftalenandcrisprcas9whentargetingthehumanccr5gene
AT cottadealmeidavinicius comparisonoftheeditingpatternsandeditingefficienciesoftalenandcrisprcas9whentargetingthehumanccr5gene
AT tanuriamilcar comparisonoftheeditingpatternsandeditingefficienciesoftalenandcrisprcas9whentargetingthehumanccr5gene