Cargando…

The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis

Next-generation sequencing approaches used to characterize microbial communities are subject to technical caveats that can lead to major distortion of acquired data. Determining the optimal sample handling protocol is essential to minimize the bias for different sample types. Using a mock community...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hallmaier-Wacker, Luisa K., Lueert, Simone, Roos, Christian, Knauf, Sascha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24573-y
_version_ 1783315792124706816
author Hallmaier-Wacker, Luisa K.
Lueert, Simone
Roos, Christian
Knauf, Sascha
author_facet Hallmaier-Wacker, Luisa K.
Lueert, Simone
Roos, Christian
Knauf, Sascha
author_sort Hallmaier-Wacker, Luisa K.
collection PubMed
description Next-generation sequencing approaches used to characterize microbial communities are subject to technical caveats that can lead to major distortion of acquired data. Determining the optimal sample handling protocol is essential to minimize the bias for different sample types. Using a mock community composed of 22 bacterial strains of even concentration, we studied a combination of handling conditions to determine the optimal conditions for swab material. Examining a combination of effects simulates the reality of handling environmental samples and may thus provide a better foundation for the standardization of protocols. We found that the choice of storage buffer and extraction kit affects the detected bacterial composition, while different 16S rRNA amplification methods only had a minor effect. All bacterial genera present in the mock community were identified with minimal levels of contamination independent of the choice of sample processing. Despite this, the observed bacterial profile for all tested conditions were significantly different from the expected abundance. This highlights the need for proper validation and standardization for each sample type using a mock community and blank control samples, to assess the bias in the protocol and reduce variation across the datasets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5908915
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59089152018-04-30 The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis Hallmaier-Wacker, Luisa K. Lueert, Simone Roos, Christian Knauf, Sascha Sci Rep Article Next-generation sequencing approaches used to characterize microbial communities are subject to technical caveats that can lead to major distortion of acquired data. Determining the optimal sample handling protocol is essential to minimize the bias for different sample types. Using a mock community composed of 22 bacterial strains of even concentration, we studied a combination of handling conditions to determine the optimal conditions for swab material. Examining a combination of effects simulates the reality of handling environmental samples and may thus provide a better foundation for the standardization of protocols. We found that the choice of storage buffer and extraction kit affects the detected bacterial composition, while different 16S rRNA amplification methods only had a minor effect. All bacterial genera present in the mock community were identified with minimal levels of contamination independent of the choice of sample processing. Despite this, the observed bacterial profile for all tested conditions were significantly different from the expected abundance. This highlights the need for proper validation and standardization for each sample type using a mock community and blank control samples, to assess the bias in the protocol and reduce variation across the datasets. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-04-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5908915/ /pubmed/29674641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24573-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hallmaier-Wacker, Luisa K.
Lueert, Simone
Roos, Christian
Knauf, Sascha
The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis
title The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis
title_full The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis
title_fullStr The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis
title_full_unstemmed The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis
title_short The impact of storage buffer, DNA extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis
title_sort impact of storage buffer, dna extraction method, and polymerase on microbial analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5908915/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29674641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24573-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hallmaierwackerluisak theimpactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis
AT lueertsimone theimpactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis
AT rooschristian theimpactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis
AT knaufsascha theimpactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis
AT hallmaierwackerluisak impactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis
AT lueertsimone impactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis
AT rooschristian impactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis
AT knaufsascha impactofstoragebufferdnaextractionmethodandpolymeraseonmicrobialanalysis