Cargando…

Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

The study of monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder can elucidate mechanisms that contribute to the disorder, which affects around 7% of children. First, using in vivo neuroanatomic imaging on 14 pairs of monozygotic twins (mean age 9.7, standard deviation 1.9 year...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yun-Ching, Sudre, Gustavo, Sharp, Wendy, Donovan, Frank, Chandrasekharappa, Settara C., Hansen, Nancy, Elnitski, Laura, Shaw, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.45
_version_ 1783316711292796928
author Chen, Yun-Ching
Sudre, Gustavo
Sharp, Wendy
Donovan, Frank
Chandrasekharappa, Settara C.
Hansen, Nancy
Elnitski, Laura
Shaw, Philip
author_facet Chen, Yun-Ching
Sudre, Gustavo
Sharp, Wendy
Donovan, Frank
Chandrasekharappa, Settara C.
Hansen, Nancy
Elnitski, Laura
Shaw, Philip
author_sort Chen, Yun-Ching
collection PubMed
description The study of monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder can elucidate mechanisms that contribute to the disorder, which affects around 7% of children. First, using in vivo neuroanatomic imaging on 14 pairs of monozygotic twins (mean age 9.7, standard deviation 1.9 years), we find that discordance for the disorder is mirrored by differing dimensions of deep brain structures (the striatum and cerebellum), but not the cerebral cortex. Next, using whole blood DNA from the same twins, we find a significant enrichment of epigenetic differences in genes expressed in these ‘discordant’ brain structures. Specifically, there is differential methylation of probes lying in the shore and shelf and enhancer regions of striatal and cerebellar genes. Notably, gene sets pertaining to the cerebral cortex (which did not differ in volume between affected and unaffected twins) were not enriched by differentially methylated probes. Genotypic differences between the twin pairs – such as copy number and rare, single nucleotide variants- did not contribute to phenotypic discordance. Pathway analyses of the genes implicated by the most differentially methylated probes implicated GABA, dopamine and serotonin neurotransmitter systems. The study illustrates how neuroimaging can help guide the search for epigenomic mechanisms in neurodevelopmental disorders.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5914518
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59145182018-04-25 Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Chen, Yun-Ching Sudre, Gustavo Sharp, Wendy Donovan, Frank Chandrasekharappa, Settara C. Hansen, Nancy Elnitski, Laura Shaw, Philip Mol Psychiatry Article The study of monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder can elucidate mechanisms that contribute to the disorder, which affects around 7% of children. First, using in vivo neuroanatomic imaging on 14 pairs of monozygotic twins (mean age 9.7, standard deviation 1.9 years), we find that discordance for the disorder is mirrored by differing dimensions of deep brain structures (the striatum and cerebellum), but not the cerebral cortex. Next, using whole blood DNA from the same twins, we find a significant enrichment of epigenetic differences in genes expressed in these ‘discordant’ brain structures. Specifically, there is differential methylation of probes lying in the shore and shelf and enhancer regions of striatal and cerebellar genes. Notably, gene sets pertaining to the cerebral cortex (which did not differ in volume between affected and unaffected twins) were not enriched by differentially methylated probes. Genotypic differences between the twin pairs – such as copy number and rare, single nucleotide variants- did not contribute to phenotypic discordance. Pathway analyses of the genes implicated by the most differentially methylated probes implicated GABA, dopamine and serotonin neurotransmitter systems. The study illustrates how neuroimaging can help guide the search for epigenomic mechanisms in neurodevelopmental disorders. 2017-03-21 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5914518/ /pubmed/28322272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.45 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Chen, Yun-Ching
Sudre, Gustavo
Sharp, Wendy
Donovan, Frank
Chandrasekharappa, Settara C.
Hansen, Nancy
Elnitski, Laura
Shaw, Philip
Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
title Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
title_full Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
title_fullStr Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
title_full_unstemmed Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
title_short Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
title_sort neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914518/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.45
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyunching neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT sudregustavo neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT sharpwendy neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT donovanfrank neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT chandrasekharappasettarac neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT hansennancy neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT elnitskilaura neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder
AT shawphilip neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder