Cargando…
Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
The study of monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder can elucidate mechanisms that contribute to the disorder, which affects around 7% of children. First, using in vivo neuroanatomic imaging on 14 pairs of monozygotic twins (mean age 9.7, standard deviation 1.9 year...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.45 |
_version_ | 1783316711292796928 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Yun-Ching Sudre, Gustavo Sharp, Wendy Donovan, Frank Chandrasekharappa, Settara C. Hansen, Nancy Elnitski, Laura Shaw, Philip |
author_facet | Chen, Yun-Ching Sudre, Gustavo Sharp, Wendy Donovan, Frank Chandrasekharappa, Settara C. Hansen, Nancy Elnitski, Laura Shaw, Philip |
author_sort | Chen, Yun-Ching |
collection | PubMed |
description | The study of monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder can elucidate mechanisms that contribute to the disorder, which affects around 7% of children. First, using in vivo neuroanatomic imaging on 14 pairs of monozygotic twins (mean age 9.7, standard deviation 1.9 years), we find that discordance for the disorder is mirrored by differing dimensions of deep brain structures (the striatum and cerebellum), but not the cerebral cortex. Next, using whole blood DNA from the same twins, we find a significant enrichment of epigenetic differences in genes expressed in these ‘discordant’ brain structures. Specifically, there is differential methylation of probes lying in the shore and shelf and enhancer regions of striatal and cerebellar genes. Notably, gene sets pertaining to the cerebral cortex (which did not differ in volume between affected and unaffected twins) were not enriched by differentially methylated probes. Genotypic differences between the twin pairs – such as copy number and rare, single nucleotide variants- did not contribute to phenotypic discordance. Pathway analyses of the genes implicated by the most differentially methylated probes implicated GABA, dopamine and serotonin neurotransmitter systems. The study illustrates how neuroimaging can help guide the search for epigenomic mechanisms in neurodevelopmental disorders. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5914518 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59145182018-04-25 Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Chen, Yun-Ching Sudre, Gustavo Sharp, Wendy Donovan, Frank Chandrasekharappa, Settara C. Hansen, Nancy Elnitski, Laura Shaw, Philip Mol Psychiatry Article The study of monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder can elucidate mechanisms that contribute to the disorder, which affects around 7% of children. First, using in vivo neuroanatomic imaging on 14 pairs of monozygotic twins (mean age 9.7, standard deviation 1.9 years), we find that discordance for the disorder is mirrored by differing dimensions of deep brain structures (the striatum and cerebellum), but not the cerebral cortex. Next, using whole blood DNA from the same twins, we find a significant enrichment of epigenetic differences in genes expressed in these ‘discordant’ brain structures. Specifically, there is differential methylation of probes lying in the shore and shelf and enhancer regions of striatal and cerebellar genes. Notably, gene sets pertaining to the cerebral cortex (which did not differ in volume between affected and unaffected twins) were not enriched by differentially methylated probes. Genotypic differences between the twin pairs – such as copy number and rare, single nucleotide variants- did not contribute to phenotypic discordance. Pathway analyses of the genes implicated by the most differentially methylated probes implicated GABA, dopamine and serotonin neurotransmitter systems. The study illustrates how neuroimaging can help guide the search for epigenomic mechanisms in neurodevelopmental disorders. 2017-03-21 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5914518/ /pubmed/28322272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.45 Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Chen, Yun-Ching Sudre, Gustavo Sharp, Wendy Donovan, Frank Chandrasekharappa, Settara C. Hansen, Nancy Elnitski, Laura Shaw, Philip Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder |
title | Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_full | Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_fullStr | Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_full_unstemmed | Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_short | Neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder |
title_sort | neuroanatomic, epigenetic, and genetic differences in monozygotic twins discordant for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5914518/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28322272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/mp.2017.45 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenyunching neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT sudregustavo neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT sharpwendy neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT donovanfrank neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT chandrasekharappasettarac neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT hansennancy neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT elnitskilaura neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder AT shawphilip neuroanatomicepigeneticandgeneticdifferencesinmonozygotictwinsdiscordantforattentiondeficithyperactivitydisorder |