Cargando…

An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods

Evolutionary morphological and physiological differences between browsers and grazers contribute to species‐specific digestion efficiency of food resources. Rumen microbial community structure of browsers is supposedly adapted to characteristic nutrient composition of the diet source. If this assump...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Krizsan, Sophie J., Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro, Bertilsson, Stefan, Felton, Annika, Anttila, Anne, Ramin, Mohammad, Vaga, Merko, Gidlund, Helena, Huhtanen, Pekka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3920
_version_ 1783316989512515584
author Krizsan, Sophie J.
Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro
Bertilsson, Stefan
Felton, Annika
Anttila, Anne
Ramin, Mohammad
Vaga, Merko
Gidlund, Helena
Huhtanen, Pekka
author_facet Krizsan, Sophie J.
Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro
Bertilsson, Stefan
Felton, Annika
Anttila, Anne
Ramin, Mohammad
Vaga, Merko
Gidlund, Helena
Huhtanen, Pekka
author_sort Krizsan, Sophie J.
collection PubMed
description Evolutionary morphological and physiological differences between browsers and grazers contribute to species‐specific digestion efficiency of food resources. Rumen microbial community structure of browsers is supposedly adapted to characteristic nutrient composition of the diet source. If this assumption is correct, domesticated ruminants, or grazers, are poor model animals for assessing the nutritional value of food consumed by browsing game species. In this study, typical spring and summer foods of the European moose (Alces alces) were combined with rumen fluid collected from both dairy cows (Bos taurus) and from moose, with the aim of comparing fermentation efficiency and microbial community composition. The nutritional value of the food resources was characterized by chemical analysis and advanced in vitro measurements. The study also addressed whether or not feed evaluation based on in vitro techniques with cattle rumen fluid as inoculum could be a practical alternative when evaluating the nutritional value of plants consumed by wild browsers. Our results suggest that the fermentation characteristics of moose spring and summer food are partly host‐specific and related to the contribution of the bacterial phyla Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes to the rumen microbial community. Host‐specific adaptations of the ruminal microbial community structure could be explained from the evolutionary adaptations related to feeding habitats and morphophysiological differences between browsers and grazers. However, the observed overall differences in microbial community structure could not be related to ruminal digestion parameters measured in vitro. The in vitro evaluation of digestion efficiency reveals that equal amounts of methane were produced across all feed samples regardless of whether the ruminal fluid was from moose or dairy cow. The results of this study suggested that the nutritional value of browsers' spring and summer food can be predicted using rumen fluid from domesticated grazers as inoculum in in vitro assessments of extent of digestion when excluding samples of the white water lily root, but not of fermentation characteristics as indicated by the proportions of individual fermentation fatty acids to the total of volatile fatty acids.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5916270
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59162702018-05-02 An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods Krizsan, Sophie J. Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro Bertilsson, Stefan Felton, Annika Anttila, Anne Ramin, Mohammad Vaga, Merko Gidlund, Helena Huhtanen, Pekka Ecol Evol Original Research Evolutionary morphological and physiological differences between browsers and grazers contribute to species‐specific digestion efficiency of food resources. Rumen microbial community structure of browsers is supposedly adapted to characteristic nutrient composition of the diet source. If this assumption is correct, domesticated ruminants, or grazers, are poor model animals for assessing the nutritional value of food consumed by browsing game species. In this study, typical spring and summer foods of the European moose (Alces alces) were combined with rumen fluid collected from both dairy cows (Bos taurus) and from moose, with the aim of comparing fermentation efficiency and microbial community composition. The nutritional value of the food resources was characterized by chemical analysis and advanced in vitro measurements. The study also addressed whether or not feed evaluation based on in vitro techniques with cattle rumen fluid as inoculum could be a practical alternative when evaluating the nutritional value of plants consumed by wild browsers. Our results suggest that the fermentation characteristics of moose spring and summer food are partly host‐specific and related to the contribution of the bacterial phyla Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes to the rumen microbial community. Host‐specific adaptations of the ruminal microbial community structure could be explained from the evolutionary adaptations related to feeding habitats and morphophysiological differences between browsers and grazers. However, the observed overall differences in microbial community structure could not be related to ruminal digestion parameters measured in vitro. The in vitro evaluation of digestion efficiency reveals that equal amounts of methane were produced across all feed samples regardless of whether the ruminal fluid was from moose or dairy cow. The results of this study suggested that the nutritional value of browsers' spring and summer food can be predicted using rumen fluid from domesticated grazers as inoculum in in vitro assessments of extent of digestion when excluding samples of the white water lily root, but not of fermentation characteristics as indicated by the proportions of individual fermentation fatty acids to the total of volatile fatty acids. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5916270/ /pubmed/29721290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3920 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Krizsan, Sophie J.
Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro
Bertilsson, Stefan
Felton, Annika
Anttila, Anne
Ramin, Mohammad
Vaga, Merko
Gidlund, Helena
Huhtanen, Pekka
An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods
title An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods
title_full An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods
title_fullStr An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods
title_short An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods
title_sort in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using european moose spring and summer foods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916270/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3920
work_keys_str_mv AT krizsansophiej aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT mateosriveraalejandro aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT bertilssonstefan aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT feltonannika aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT anttilaanne aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT raminmohammad aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT vagamerko aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT gidlundhelena aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT huhtanenpekka aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT krizsansophiej invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT mateosriveraalejandro invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT bertilssonstefan invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT feltonannika invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT anttilaanne invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT raminmohammad invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT vagamerko invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT gidlundhelena invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods
AT huhtanenpekka invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods