Cargando…
An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods
Evolutionary morphological and physiological differences between browsers and grazers contribute to species‐specific digestion efficiency of food resources. Rumen microbial community structure of browsers is supposedly adapted to characteristic nutrient composition of the diet source. If this assump...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3920 |
_version_ | 1783316989512515584 |
---|---|
author | Krizsan, Sophie J. Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro Bertilsson, Stefan Felton, Annika Anttila, Anne Ramin, Mohammad Vaga, Merko Gidlund, Helena Huhtanen, Pekka |
author_facet | Krizsan, Sophie J. Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro Bertilsson, Stefan Felton, Annika Anttila, Anne Ramin, Mohammad Vaga, Merko Gidlund, Helena Huhtanen, Pekka |
author_sort | Krizsan, Sophie J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Evolutionary morphological and physiological differences between browsers and grazers contribute to species‐specific digestion efficiency of food resources. Rumen microbial community structure of browsers is supposedly adapted to characteristic nutrient composition of the diet source. If this assumption is correct, domesticated ruminants, or grazers, are poor model animals for assessing the nutritional value of food consumed by browsing game species. In this study, typical spring and summer foods of the European moose (Alces alces) were combined with rumen fluid collected from both dairy cows (Bos taurus) and from moose, with the aim of comparing fermentation efficiency and microbial community composition. The nutritional value of the food resources was characterized by chemical analysis and advanced in vitro measurements. The study also addressed whether or not feed evaluation based on in vitro techniques with cattle rumen fluid as inoculum could be a practical alternative when evaluating the nutritional value of plants consumed by wild browsers. Our results suggest that the fermentation characteristics of moose spring and summer food are partly host‐specific and related to the contribution of the bacterial phyla Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes to the rumen microbial community. Host‐specific adaptations of the ruminal microbial community structure could be explained from the evolutionary adaptations related to feeding habitats and morphophysiological differences between browsers and grazers. However, the observed overall differences in microbial community structure could not be related to ruminal digestion parameters measured in vitro. The in vitro evaluation of digestion efficiency reveals that equal amounts of methane were produced across all feed samples regardless of whether the ruminal fluid was from moose or dairy cow. The results of this study suggested that the nutritional value of browsers' spring and summer food can be predicted using rumen fluid from domesticated grazers as inoculum in in vitro assessments of extent of digestion when excluding samples of the white water lily root, but not of fermentation characteristics as indicated by the proportions of individual fermentation fatty acids to the total of volatile fatty acids. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5916270 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59162702018-05-02 An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods Krizsan, Sophie J. Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro Bertilsson, Stefan Felton, Annika Anttila, Anne Ramin, Mohammad Vaga, Merko Gidlund, Helena Huhtanen, Pekka Ecol Evol Original Research Evolutionary morphological and physiological differences between browsers and grazers contribute to species‐specific digestion efficiency of food resources. Rumen microbial community structure of browsers is supposedly adapted to characteristic nutrient composition of the diet source. If this assumption is correct, domesticated ruminants, or grazers, are poor model animals for assessing the nutritional value of food consumed by browsing game species. In this study, typical spring and summer foods of the European moose (Alces alces) were combined with rumen fluid collected from both dairy cows (Bos taurus) and from moose, with the aim of comparing fermentation efficiency and microbial community composition. The nutritional value of the food resources was characterized by chemical analysis and advanced in vitro measurements. The study also addressed whether or not feed evaluation based on in vitro techniques with cattle rumen fluid as inoculum could be a practical alternative when evaluating the nutritional value of plants consumed by wild browsers. Our results suggest that the fermentation characteristics of moose spring and summer food are partly host‐specific and related to the contribution of the bacterial phyla Firmicutes and Bacteriodetes to the rumen microbial community. Host‐specific adaptations of the ruminal microbial community structure could be explained from the evolutionary adaptations related to feeding habitats and morphophysiological differences between browsers and grazers. However, the observed overall differences in microbial community structure could not be related to ruminal digestion parameters measured in vitro. The in vitro evaluation of digestion efficiency reveals that equal amounts of methane were produced across all feed samples regardless of whether the ruminal fluid was from moose or dairy cow. The results of this study suggested that the nutritional value of browsers' spring and summer food can be predicted using rumen fluid from domesticated grazers as inoculum in in vitro assessments of extent of digestion when excluding samples of the white water lily root, but not of fermentation characteristics as indicated by the proportions of individual fermentation fatty acids to the total of volatile fatty acids. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5916270/ /pubmed/29721290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3920 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Krizsan, Sophie J. Mateos‐Rivera, Alejandro Bertilsson, Stefan Felton, Annika Anttila, Anne Ramin, Mohammad Vaga, Merko Gidlund, Helena Huhtanen, Pekka An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods |
title | An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods |
title_full | An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods |
title_fullStr | An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods |
title_full_unstemmed | An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods |
title_short | An in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using European moose spring and summer foods |
title_sort | in vitro evaluation of browser and grazer fermentation efficiency and microbiota using european moose spring and summer foods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5916270/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29721290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3920 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krizsansophiej aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT mateosriveraalejandro aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT bertilssonstefan aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT feltonannika aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT anttilaanne aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT raminmohammad aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT vagamerko aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT gidlundhelena aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT huhtanenpekka aninvitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT krizsansophiej invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT mateosriveraalejandro invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT bertilssonstefan invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT feltonannika invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT anttilaanne invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT raminmohammad invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT vagamerko invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT gidlundhelena invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods AT huhtanenpekka invitroevaluationofbrowserandgrazerfermentationefficiencyandmicrobiotausingeuropeanmoosespringandsummerfoods |