Cargando…

Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions

Allelic imbalance (AI) indicates the presence of functional variation in cis regulatory regions. Detecting cis regulatory differences using AI is widespread, yet there is no formal statistical methodology that tests whether AI differs between conditions. Here, we present a novel model and formally t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: León-Novelo, Luis, Gerken, Alison R., Graze, Rita M., McIntyre, Lauren M., Marroni, Fabio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Genetics Society of America 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5919738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.300139
_version_ 1783317696789610496
author León-Novelo, Luis
Gerken, Alison R.
Graze, Rita M.
McIntyre, Lauren M.
Marroni, Fabio
author_facet León-Novelo, Luis
Gerken, Alison R.
Graze, Rita M.
McIntyre, Lauren M.
Marroni, Fabio
author_sort León-Novelo, Luis
collection PubMed
description Allelic imbalance (AI) indicates the presence of functional variation in cis regulatory regions. Detecting cis regulatory differences using AI is widespread, yet there is no formal statistical methodology that tests whether AI differs between conditions. Here, we present a novel model and formally test differences in AI across conditions using Bayesian credible intervals. The approach tests AI by environment (G×E) interactions, and can be used to test AI between environments, genotypes, sex, and any other condition. We incorporate bias into the modeling process. Bias is allowed to vary between conditions, making the formulation of the model general. As gene expression affects power for detection of AI, and, as expression may vary between conditions, the model explicitly takes coverage into account. The proposed model has low type I and II error under several scenarios, and is robust to large differences in coverage between conditions. We reanalyze RNA-seq data from a Drosophila melanogaster population panel, with F1 genotypes, to compare levels of AI between mated and virgin female flies, and we show that AI × genotype interactions can also be tested. To demonstrate the use of the model to test genetic differences and interactions, a formal test between two F1s was performed, showing the expected 20% difference in AI. The proposed model allows a formal test of G×E and G×G, and reaffirms a previous finding that cis regulation is robust between environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5919738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Genetics Society of America
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59197382018-04-27 Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions León-Novelo, Luis Gerken, Alison R. Graze, Rita M. McIntyre, Lauren M. Marroni, Fabio G3 (Bethesda) Investigations Allelic imbalance (AI) indicates the presence of functional variation in cis regulatory regions. Detecting cis regulatory differences using AI is widespread, yet there is no formal statistical methodology that tests whether AI differs between conditions. Here, we present a novel model and formally test differences in AI across conditions using Bayesian credible intervals. The approach tests AI by environment (G×E) interactions, and can be used to test AI between environments, genotypes, sex, and any other condition. We incorporate bias into the modeling process. Bias is allowed to vary between conditions, making the formulation of the model general. As gene expression affects power for detection of AI, and, as expression may vary between conditions, the model explicitly takes coverage into account. The proposed model has low type I and II error under several scenarios, and is robust to large differences in coverage between conditions. We reanalyze RNA-seq data from a Drosophila melanogaster population panel, with F1 genotypes, to compare levels of AI between mated and virgin female flies, and we show that AI × genotype interactions can also be tested. To demonstrate the use of the model to test genetic differences and interactions, a formal test between two F1s was performed, showing the expected 20% difference in AI. The proposed model allows a formal test of G×E and G×G, and reaffirms a previous finding that cis regulation is robust between environments. Genetics Society of America 2017-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5919738/ /pubmed/29167272 http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.300139 Text en Copyright © 2018 Novelo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Investigations
León-Novelo, Luis
Gerken, Alison R.
Graze, Rita M.
McIntyre, Lauren M.
Marroni, Fabio
Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions
title Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions
title_full Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions
title_fullStr Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions
title_full_unstemmed Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions
title_short Direct Testing for Allele-Specific Expression Differences Between Conditions
title_sort direct testing for allele-specific expression differences between conditions
topic Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5919738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29167272
http://dx.doi.org/10.1534/g3.117.300139
work_keys_str_mv AT leonnoveloluis directtestingforallelespecificexpressiondifferencesbetweenconditions
AT gerkenalisonr directtestingforallelespecificexpressiondifferencesbetweenconditions
AT grazeritam directtestingforallelespecificexpressiondifferencesbetweenconditions
AT mcintyrelaurenm directtestingforallelespecificexpressiondifferencesbetweenconditions
AT marronifabio directtestingforallelespecificexpressiondifferencesbetweenconditions