Cargando…

The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis

BACKGROUND: Distribution shifts of the modified Rankin scale (mRs) is used as outcome measure in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) randomized controlled trials (RCT). Distribution across strata of mRs is relevant for sample size calculations and may be affected by eligibility criteria. AIM: We aimed to as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Olavarría, Verónica V., Brunser, Alejandro, Cabral, Norberto, Martins, Sheila, Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula, Cavada, Gabriel, Lavados, Pablo M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.008
_version_ 1783320503360946176
author Olavarría, Verónica V.
Brunser, Alejandro
Cabral, Norberto
Martins, Sheila
Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula
Cavada, Gabriel
Lavados, Pablo M.
author_facet Olavarría, Verónica V.
Brunser, Alejandro
Cabral, Norberto
Martins, Sheila
Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula
Cavada, Gabriel
Lavados, Pablo M.
author_sort Olavarría, Verónica V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distribution shifts of the modified Rankin scale (mRs) is used as outcome measure in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) randomized controlled trials (RCT). Distribution across strata of mRs is relevant for sample size calculations and may be affected by eligibility criteria. AIM: We aimed to assess the distribution of mRs scores across its different strata in AIS according to usual eligibility criteria. METHODS: We computed follow-up mRs strata distribution between an unselected cohort and samples with (a) time from symptom onset < 6 h (b) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores > 3 and < 25, and (c) both criteria combined. We compared distributions with the Mann-Whitney U Test and calculated sample sizes for each distribution. RESULTS: We included 5849 AIS patients. The unselected sample had a non-normal distribution with a median of 2. All selection criteria yielded significantly different distributions of mRs (p = 004, 0.02 and 0.02 respectively). This resulted in a significant variation in the calculated sample size when applying different selection criteria, with smaller numbers when RCT selection criteria are used (3616 versus 1553). CONCLUSIONS: The use of usual RCT eligibility criteria result in significant differences in mRs distribution and smaller sample sizes compared to unselected AIS samples.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5936693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59366932018-05-08 The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis Olavarría, Verónica V. Brunser, Alejandro Cabral, Norberto Martins, Sheila Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula Cavada, Gabriel Lavados, Pablo M. Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article BACKGROUND: Distribution shifts of the modified Rankin scale (mRs) is used as outcome measure in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) randomized controlled trials (RCT). Distribution across strata of mRs is relevant for sample size calculations and may be affected by eligibility criteria. AIM: We aimed to assess the distribution of mRs scores across its different strata in AIS according to usual eligibility criteria. METHODS: We computed follow-up mRs strata distribution between an unselected cohort and samples with (a) time from symptom onset < 6 h (b) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores > 3 and < 25, and (c) both criteria combined. We compared distributions with the Mann-Whitney U Test and calculated sample sizes for each distribution. RESULTS: We included 5849 AIS patients. The unselected sample had a non-normal distribution with a median of 2. All selection criteria yielded significantly different distributions of mRs (p = 004, 0.02 and 0.02 respectively). This resulted in a significant variation in the calculated sample size when applying different selection criteria, with smaller numbers when RCT selection criteria are used (3616 versus 1553). CONCLUSIONS: The use of usual RCT eligibility criteria result in significant differences in mRs distribution and smaller sample sizes compared to unselected AIS samples. Elsevier 2017-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5936693/ /pubmed/29740628 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.008 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Olavarría, Verónica V.
Brunser, Alejandro
Cabral, Norberto
Martins, Sheila
Muñoz-Venturelli, Paula
Cavada, Gabriel
Lavados, Pablo M.
The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis
title The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis
title_full The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis
title_fullStr The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis
title_full_unstemmed The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis
title_short The distribution of the modified Rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: A consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis
title_sort distribution of the modified rankin scale scores change according to eligibility criteria in acute ischemic stroke trials: a consideration for sample size calculations when using ordinal regression analysis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5936693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29740628
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2017.01.008
work_keys_str_mv AT olavarriaveronicav thedistributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT brunseralejandro thedistributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT cabralnorberto thedistributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT martinssheila thedistributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT munozventurellipaula thedistributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT cavadagabriel thedistributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT lavadospablom thedistributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT olavarriaveronicav distributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT brunseralejandro distributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT cabralnorberto distributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT martinssheila distributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT munozventurellipaula distributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT cavadagabriel distributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis
AT lavadospablom distributionofthemodifiedrankinscalescoreschangeaccordingtoeligibilitycriteriainacuteischemicstroketrialsaconsiderationforsamplesizecalculationswhenusingordinalregressionanalysis