Cargando…

Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting

BACKGROUND: Iliac crest bone harvesting is a frequently performed surgical procedure widely used to treat bone defects. The objective of this study is to assess the biomechanical quantities related to risk for pelvic fracture after harvesting an autologous bone graft at the anterior iliac crest. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmitz, Paul, Cornelius Neumann, Christoph, Neumann, Carsten, Nerlich, Michael, Dendorfer, Sebastian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0822-1
_version_ 1783321354915807232
author Schmitz, Paul
Cornelius Neumann, Christoph
Neumann, Carsten
Nerlich, Michael
Dendorfer, Sebastian
author_facet Schmitz, Paul
Cornelius Neumann, Christoph
Neumann, Carsten
Nerlich, Michael
Dendorfer, Sebastian
author_sort Schmitz, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Iliac crest bone harvesting is a frequently performed surgical procedure widely used to treat bone defects. The objective of this study is to assess the biomechanical quantities related to risk for pelvic fracture after harvesting an autologous bone graft at the anterior iliac crest. METHODS: Finite element models with a simulated harvest site (sized 15 × 20 mm, 15 × 35 mm, 30 × 20 mm and 30 × 35 mm) in the iliac wing are created. The relevant loading case is when the ipsilateral leg is lifted off the ground. Musculoskeletal analysis is utilized to compute the muscle and joint forces involved in this motion. These forces are used as boundary conditions for the finite element analyses. Bone tissue stress is analyzed. RESULTS: Critical stress peaks are located between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the anterior edge of the harvest site. Irrespective of the graft size, the iliac wing does not show any significant stress peaks with the harvest site being 20 to 25 mm posterior to the ASIS. The harvest area itself inhibits the distribution of the forces applied on the ASIS to extend to the posterior iliac wing. This leads to a lack of stress posterior to the harvest site. A balanced stress distribution with no stress peaks appears when the bone graft is taken below the iliac crest. CONCLUSION: A harvest site located at least 20 to 25 mm posterior to the ASIS should be preferred to minimize the risk of iliac fatigue fracture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5941784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59417842018-05-14 Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting Schmitz, Paul Cornelius Neumann, Christoph Neumann, Carsten Nerlich, Michael Dendorfer, Sebastian J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Iliac crest bone harvesting is a frequently performed surgical procedure widely used to treat bone defects. The objective of this study is to assess the biomechanical quantities related to risk for pelvic fracture after harvesting an autologous bone graft at the anterior iliac crest. METHODS: Finite element models with a simulated harvest site (sized 15 × 20 mm, 15 × 35 mm, 30 × 20 mm and 30 × 35 mm) in the iliac wing are created. The relevant loading case is when the ipsilateral leg is lifted off the ground. Musculoskeletal analysis is utilized to compute the muscle and joint forces involved in this motion. These forces are used as boundary conditions for the finite element analyses. Bone tissue stress is analyzed. RESULTS: Critical stress peaks are located between the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the anterior edge of the harvest site. Irrespective of the graft size, the iliac wing does not show any significant stress peaks with the harvest site being 20 to 25 mm posterior to the ASIS. The harvest area itself inhibits the distribution of the forces applied on the ASIS to extend to the posterior iliac wing. This leads to a lack of stress posterior to the harvest site. A balanced stress distribution with no stress peaks appears when the bone graft is taken below the iliac crest. CONCLUSION: A harvest site located at least 20 to 25 mm posterior to the ASIS should be preferred to minimize the risk of iliac fatigue fracture. BioMed Central 2018-05-09 /pmc/articles/PMC5941784/ /pubmed/29739435 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0822-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmitz, Paul
Cornelius Neumann, Christoph
Neumann, Carsten
Nerlich, Michael
Dendorfer, Sebastian
Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting
title Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting
title_full Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting
title_fullStr Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting
title_short Biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting
title_sort biomechanical analysis of iliac crest loading following cortico-cancellous bone harvesting
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5941784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29739435
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-0822-1
work_keys_str_mv AT schmitzpaul biomechanicalanalysisofiliaccrestloadingfollowingcorticocancellousboneharvesting
AT corneliusneumannchristoph biomechanicalanalysisofiliaccrestloadingfollowingcorticocancellousboneharvesting
AT neumanncarsten biomechanicalanalysisofiliaccrestloadingfollowingcorticocancellousboneharvesting
AT nerlichmichael biomechanicalanalysisofiliaccrestloadingfollowingcorticocancellousboneharvesting
AT dendorfersebastian biomechanicalanalysisofiliaccrestloadingfollowingcorticocancellousboneharvesting