Cargando…

A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes

BACKGROUND: Activation of microglia can result in phenotypic and functional diversity. However, the pathways that trigger different states of microglial activation remain to be fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that after injury, astrocytes and endothelium may contribute to a gliovascular swit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Changhong, Li, Wenlu, Deng, Wenjun, Ning, MingMing, Lo, Eng H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1189-2
_version_ 1783323279508897792
author Xing, Changhong
Li, Wenlu
Deng, Wenjun
Ning, MingMing
Lo, Eng H.
author_facet Xing, Changhong
Li, Wenlu
Deng, Wenjun
Ning, MingMing
Lo, Eng H.
author_sort Xing, Changhong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Activation of microglia can result in phenotypic and functional diversity. However, the pathways that trigger different states of microglial activation remain to be fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that after injury, astrocytes and endothelium may contribute to a gliovascular switch for microglial activation. METHODS: Astrocytes or cerebral endothelial cells were subjected to oxygen glucose deprivation, then conditioned media were transferred to microglia. The release of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 was measured using ELISA. Surface markers of CD11b, CD45, CD86, and MHC class II were detected by flow cytometry. mRNA expression of iNOS, CD86, CD206, Arginase1, and transcription factors was measured using real-time PCR. Microglial function including migration and phagocytosis was assessed. Dendritogenesis was determined by counting the number of primary dendrites, secondary dendrites, and dendritic ends in the neurons exposed to either endothelial- or astrocyte-activated microglia. RESULTS: Exposure to conditioned media from oxygen-glucose-deprived cerebral endothelial cells or oxygen-glucose-deprived astrocytes activated microglia into different forms. The endothelium converted ramified microglia into amoeboid shapes; increased the release of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10; decreased IGF-1; upregulated iNOS expression; and inhibited microglial migration and phagocytosis. In contrast, astrocytes increased microglial production of IGF-1, upregulated CD206 expression, and enhanced microglial phagocytosis. These opposing effects of the endothelium versus astrocyte crosstalk partly mirror potentially deleterious versus potentially beneficial microglial phenotypes. Consistent with this idea, endothelial-activated microglia were neurotoxic, whereas astrocyte-activated microglia did not affect neuronal viability but instead promoted neuronal dendritogenesis. CONCLUSION: These findings provide proof of concept that endothelial cells and astrocytes provide differing signals to microglia that influence their activation states and suggest that a gliovascular switch may be involved in the balance between beneficial versus deleterious microglial properties. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-018-1189-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5952884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59528842018-05-21 A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes Xing, Changhong Li, Wenlu Deng, Wenjun Ning, MingMing Lo, Eng H. J Neuroinflammation Research BACKGROUND: Activation of microglia can result in phenotypic and functional diversity. However, the pathways that trigger different states of microglial activation remain to be fully understood. Here, we hypothesized that after injury, astrocytes and endothelium may contribute to a gliovascular switch for microglial activation. METHODS: Astrocytes or cerebral endothelial cells were subjected to oxygen glucose deprivation, then conditioned media were transferred to microglia. The release of TNFα, IL-1β, IL-10, and IGF-1 was measured using ELISA. Surface markers of CD11b, CD45, CD86, and MHC class II were detected by flow cytometry. mRNA expression of iNOS, CD86, CD206, Arginase1, and transcription factors was measured using real-time PCR. Microglial function including migration and phagocytosis was assessed. Dendritogenesis was determined by counting the number of primary dendrites, secondary dendrites, and dendritic ends in the neurons exposed to either endothelial- or astrocyte-activated microglia. RESULTS: Exposure to conditioned media from oxygen-glucose-deprived cerebral endothelial cells or oxygen-glucose-deprived astrocytes activated microglia into different forms. The endothelium converted ramified microglia into amoeboid shapes; increased the release of TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-10; decreased IGF-1; upregulated iNOS expression; and inhibited microglial migration and phagocytosis. In contrast, astrocytes increased microglial production of IGF-1, upregulated CD206 expression, and enhanced microglial phagocytosis. These opposing effects of the endothelium versus astrocyte crosstalk partly mirror potentially deleterious versus potentially beneficial microglial phenotypes. Consistent with this idea, endothelial-activated microglia were neurotoxic, whereas astrocyte-activated microglia did not affect neuronal viability but instead promoted neuronal dendritogenesis. CONCLUSION: These findings provide proof of concept that endothelial cells and astrocytes provide differing signals to microglia that influence their activation states and suggest that a gliovascular switch may be involved in the balance between beneficial versus deleterious microglial properties. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12974-018-1189-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5952884/ /pubmed/29764475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1189-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Xing, Changhong
Li, Wenlu
Deng, Wenjun
Ning, MingMing
Lo, Eng H.
A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes
title A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes
title_full A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes
title_fullStr A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes
title_full_unstemmed A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes
title_short A potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes
title_sort potential gliovascular mechanism for microglial activation: differential phenotypic switching of microglia by endothelium versus astrocytes
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5952884/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29764475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12974-018-1189-2
work_keys_str_mv AT xingchanghong apotentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT liwenlu apotentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT dengwenjun apotentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT ningmingming apotentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT loengh apotentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT xingchanghong potentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT liwenlu potentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT dengwenjun potentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT ningmingming potentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes
AT loengh potentialgliovascularmechanismformicroglialactivationdifferentialphenotypicswitchingofmicrogliabyendotheliumversusastrocytes