Cargando…

Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?

In the past, different types of diet with a generally low-carbohydrate content (< 50–< 20 g/day) have been promoted, for weight loss and diabetes, and the effectiveness of a very low dietary carbohydrate content has always been a matter of debate. A significant reduction in the amount of carbo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Brouns, Fred
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1636-y
_version_ 1783324495932555264
author Brouns, Fred
author_facet Brouns, Fred
author_sort Brouns, Fred
collection PubMed
description In the past, different types of diet with a generally low-carbohydrate content (< 50–< 20 g/day) have been promoted, for weight loss and diabetes, and the effectiveness of a very low dietary carbohydrate content has always been a matter of debate. A significant reduction in the amount of carbohydrates in the diet is usually accompanied by an increase in the amount of fat and to a lesser extent, also protein. Accordingly, using the term “low carb–high fat” (LCHF) diet is most appropriate. Low/very low intakes of carbohydrate food sources may impact on overall diet quality and long-term effects of such drastic diet changes remain at present unknown. This narrative review highlights recent metabolic and clinical outcomes of studies as well as practical feasibility of low LCHF diets. A few relevant observations are as follows: (1) any diet type resulting in reduced energy intake will result in weight loss and related favorable metabolic and functional changes; (2) short-term LCHF studies show both favorable and less desirable effects; (3) sustained adherence to a ketogenic LCHF diet appears to be difficult. A non-ketogenic diet supplying 100–150 g carbohydrate/day, under good control, may be more practical. (4) There is lack of data supporting long-term efficacy, safety and health benefits of LCHF diets. Any recommendation should be judged in this light. (5) Lifestyle intervention in people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, while maintaining a relative carbohydrate-rich diet, results in long-term prevention of progression to type 2 diabetes and is generally seen as safe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5959976
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59599762018-05-24 Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable? Brouns, Fred Eur J Nutr Review In the past, different types of diet with a generally low-carbohydrate content (< 50–< 20 g/day) have been promoted, for weight loss and diabetes, and the effectiveness of a very low dietary carbohydrate content has always been a matter of debate. A significant reduction in the amount of carbohydrates in the diet is usually accompanied by an increase in the amount of fat and to a lesser extent, also protein. Accordingly, using the term “low carb–high fat” (LCHF) diet is most appropriate. Low/very low intakes of carbohydrate food sources may impact on overall diet quality and long-term effects of such drastic diet changes remain at present unknown. This narrative review highlights recent metabolic and clinical outcomes of studies as well as practical feasibility of low LCHF diets. A few relevant observations are as follows: (1) any diet type resulting in reduced energy intake will result in weight loss and related favorable metabolic and functional changes; (2) short-term LCHF studies show both favorable and less desirable effects; (3) sustained adherence to a ketogenic LCHF diet appears to be difficult. A non-ketogenic diet supplying 100–150 g carbohydrate/day, under good control, may be more practical. (4) There is lack of data supporting long-term efficacy, safety and health benefits of LCHF diets. Any recommendation should be judged in this light. (5) Lifestyle intervention in people at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes, while maintaining a relative carbohydrate-rich diet, results in long-term prevention of progression to type 2 diabetes and is generally seen as safe. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2018-03-14 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5959976/ /pubmed/29541907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1636-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review
Brouns, Fred
Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?
title Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?
title_full Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?
title_fullStr Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?
title_full_unstemmed Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?
title_short Overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?
title_sort overweight and diabetes prevention: is a low-carbohydrate–high-fat diet recommendable?
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5959976/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29541907
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00394-018-1636-y
work_keys_str_mv AT brounsfred overweightanddiabetespreventionisalowcarbohydratehighfatdietrecommendable