Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals

BACKGROUND: Despite rapid growth of the scientific literature, no consensus guidelines have emerged to define the optimal criteria for editors to grade submitted manuscripts. The purpose of this project was to assess the peer reviewer metrics currently used in the surgical literature to evaluate ori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davis, Catherine H., Bass, Barbara L., Behrns, Kevin E., Lillemoe, Keith D., Garden, O. James, Roh, Mark S., Lee, Jeffrey E., Balch, Charles M., Aloia, Thomas A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Research
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0048-0

Internet

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964882/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850109
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0048-0

Ejemplares similares