Cargando…

Reviewing the review: a qualitative assessment of the peer review process in surgical journals

BACKGROUND: Despite rapid growth of the scientific literature, no consensus guidelines have emerged to define the optimal criteria for editors to grade submitted manuscripts. The purpose of this project was to assess the peer reviewer metrics currently used in the surgical literature to evaluate ori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Davis, Catherine H., Bass, Barbara L., Behrns, Kevin E., Lillemoe, Keith D., Garden, O. James, Roh, Mark S., Lee, Jeffrey E., Balch, Charles M., Aloia, Thomas A.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2018
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5964882/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29850109 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41073-018-0048-0

Ejemplares similares

Surgical research journals - Under review: An assessment of diversity among editorial boards and outcomes of peer review
por: White, Erin M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Best peer reviewers and the quality of peer review in biomedical journals
por: Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

State of the Journal 2010: Managing Growth, Extending Our Reach—Now the Official Journal for the Society of Surgical Oncology and the American Society of Breast Surgeons
por: Roh, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Peer Review in Law Journals
por: Stojanovski, Jadranka, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

The Validity of Peer Review in a General Medicine Journal
por: Jackson, Jeffrey L., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Peer review in open access scientific journals
por: Falagas, Matthew E
Publicado: (2007)

Journal editors’ perspectives on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in biomedical journals: a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Peer Review Process in Medical Journals
por: Cho, Young Gyu, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

First CytoJournal Peer-Reviewer's Retreat in 2006 – Open access, peer-review, and impact factor
por: Shidham, Vinod B, et al.
Publicado: (2006)

Peer Review Quality and Transparency of the Peer-Review Process in Open Access and Subscription Journals
por: Wicherts, Jelte M.
Publicado: (2016)

A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers
por: Song, Eunhye, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Improving the peer review process in orthopaedic journals
por: Sprowson, A. P., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Peer review practices by medical imaging journals
por: Kwee, Thomas C., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
por: Hamilton, Daniel G, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Editors’ perspectives on the peer-review process in biomedical journals: protocol for a qualitative study
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Gender differences in peer review outcomes and manuscript impact at six journals of ecology and evolution
por: Fox, Charles W., et al.
Publicado: (2019)

JGES: An Open Access Peer Reviewed Journal is Born
por: Pai, Hrishikesh
Publicado: (2009)

Thank you to Virology Journal’s peer reviewers in 2012
por: Wang, Linfa
Publicado: (2013)

Peer-review policy and guidelines for Biochemia Medica Journal
por: Smolčić, Vesna Šupak, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Thank you to Virology Journal's peer reviewers in 2013
por: Wang, Linfa
Publicado: (2014)

A new age of peer reviewed scientific journals
por: Adler, John R.
Publicado: (2012)

Thank you to Virology Journal’s peer reviewers in 2014
por: Wang, Linfa
Publicado: (2015)

Peer review processes and related issues in scholarly journals
por: Saeidnia, Soodabeh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Pattern of peer review proforma of medical journals of Pakistan
por: Shah, Faaiz Ali, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

The importance of peer review to International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Publicado: (2021)

Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals
por: Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

An overview of innovations in the external peer review of journal manuscripts.
por: Woods, Helen Buckley, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

European Journal of Psychiatric Trainees - a new scientific peer-reviewed Journal in Psychiatry
por: Santos Martins, F., et al.
Publicado: (2023)

The Relationship of Previous Training and Experience of Journal Peer Reviewers to Subsequent Review Quality
por: Callaham, Michael L, et al.
Publicado: (2007)

Patient-driven innovations reported in peer-reviewed journals: a scoping review
por: Reinius, Maria, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

A scoping review on the roles and tasks of peer reviewers in the manuscript review process in biomedical journals
por: Glonti, Ketevan, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Behavioral Sciences: An International, Open-Access, Peer Reviewed Journal
por: Coverdale, John
Publicado: (2011)

Open peer review at four STEM journals: an observational overview
por: Ford, Emily
Publicado: (2015)

Peer Review – Essential for Article and Journal Scientific Assessment and Validity
por: Masic, Izet
Publicado: (2016)

Appreciations to Peer Reviewers for Journal of Korean Medical Science 2017
por: Hong, Sung-Tae
Publicado: (2018)

Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals
por: Klebel, Thomas, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Peer review: My article was rejected by the journal I edit
por: D’Eon, Marcel
Publicado: (2020)

Reimagining the peer‐review system for translational health science journals
por: Smith, Elise M.
Publicado: (2021)

Impact of peer review on reports of randomised trials published in open peer review journals: retrospective before and after study
por: Hopewell, Sally, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Peer reviewers' willingness to review, their recommendations and quality of reviews after the Finnish Medical Journal switched from single-blind to double-blind peer review
por: Parmanne, Piitu, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_ct4jd1umt9u4fm54u274oamojd