Cargando…
Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period
ABSTRACT: Raw almonds are a major commodity, yet much is unknown about how storage conditions determine their shelf life. The storage stability, as measured by consumer assessments and chemical measures, of raw almonds was determined for samples stored in cardboard boxes and polypropylene packaging...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14055 |
_version_ | 1783325903555657728 |
---|---|
author | Pleasance, Emily A. Kerr, William L. Pegg, Ronald B. Swanson, Ruthann B. Cheely, Anna N. Huang, Guangwei Parrish, Daniel R. Kerrihard, Adrian L. |
author_facet | Pleasance, Emily A. Kerr, William L. Pegg, Ronald B. Swanson, Ruthann B. Cheely, Anna N. Huang, Guangwei Parrish, Daniel R. Kerrihard, Adrian L. |
author_sort | Pleasance, Emily A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | ABSTRACT: Raw almonds are a major commodity, yet much is unknown about how storage conditions determine their shelf life. The storage stability, as measured by consumer assessments and chemical measures, of raw almonds was determined for samples stored in cardboard boxes and polypropylene packaging for 2 years at 4, 15, 25, and 35 °C, and at 50% and 65% relative humidity (RH). Samples stored in unlined cartons always failed (>25% rejection) before their counterparts stored in polypropylene bags under identical environmental conditions. Models determined that polypropylene packaging (as opposed to unlined cardboard cartons) extended the time until sample rejection by more than 7 months. Temperature and RH were both negatively associated with storage time until failure. Flavor was a greater contributor to consumer acceptability than texture or odor, while peroxide values and free fatty acids were of greater importance in predicting raw almond consumer quality than measures of conjugated dienes or 2‐thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The results of this study will allow almond producers to determine packaging types and environmental storage conditions that provide shelf life of a specified time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5969087 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59690872018-05-30 Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period Pleasance, Emily A. Kerr, William L. Pegg, Ronald B. Swanson, Ruthann B. Cheely, Anna N. Huang, Guangwei Parrish, Daniel R. Kerrihard, Adrian L. J Food Sci Sensory and Food Quality ABSTRACT: Raw almonds are a major commodity, yet much is unknown about how storage conditions determine their shelf life. The storage stability, as measured by consumer assessments and chemical measures, of raw almonds was determined for samples stored in cardboard boxes and polypropylene packaging for 2 years at 4, 15, 25, and 35 °C, and at 50% and 65% relative humidity (RH). Samples stored in unlined cartons always failed (>25% rejection) before their counterparts stored in polypropylene bags under identical environmental conditions. Models determined that polypropylene packaging (as opposed to unlined cardboard cartons) extended the time until sample rejection by more than 7 months. Temperature and RH were both negatively associated with storage time until failure. Flavor was a greater contributor to consumer acceptability than texture or odor, while peroxide values and free fatty acids were of greater importance in predicting raw almond consumer quality than measures of conjugated dienes or 2‐thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The results of this study will allow almond producers to determine packaging types and environmental storage conditions that provide shelf life of a specified time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-22 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5969087/ /pubmed/29355948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14055 Text en © 2018 The Authors Journal of Food Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Institute of Food Technologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Sensory and Food Quality Pleasance, Emily A. Kerr, William L. Pegg, Ronald B. Swanson, Ruthann B. Cheely, Anna N. Huang, Guangwei Parrish, Daniel R. Kerrihard, Adrian L. Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period |
title | Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period |
title_full | Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period |
title_fullStr | Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period |
title_short | Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period |
title_sort | effects of storage conditions on consumer and chemical assessments of raw ‘nonpareil’ almonds over a two‐year period |
topic | Sensory and Food Quality |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969087/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pleasanceemilya effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod AT kerrwilliaml effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod AT peggronaldb effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod AT swansonruthannb effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod AT cheelyannan effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod AT huangguangwei effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod AT parrishdanielr effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod AT kerrihardadrianl effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod |