Cargando…

Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period

ABSTRACT: Raw almonds are a major commodity, yet much is unknown about how storage conditions determine their shelf life. The storage stability, as measured by consumer assessments and chemical measures, of raw almonds was determined for samples stored in cardboard boxes and polypropylene packaging...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pleasance, Emily A., Kerr, William L., Pegg, Ronald B., Swanson, Ruthann B., Cheely, Anna N., Huang, Guangwei, Parrish, Daniel R., Kerrihard, Adrian L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14055
_version_ 1783325903555657728
author Pleasance, Emily A.
Kerr, William L.
Pegg, Ronald B.
Swanson, Ruthann B.
Cheely, Anna N.
Huang, Guangwei
Parrish, Daniel R.
Kerrihard, Adrian L.
author_facet Pleasance, Emily A.
Kerr, William L.
Pegg, Ronald B.
Swanson, Ruthann B.
Cheely, Anna N.
Huang, Guangwei
Parrish, Daniel R.
Kerrihard, Adrian L.
author_sort Pleasance, Emily A.
collection PubMed
description ABSTRACT: Raw almonds are a major commodity, yet much is unknown about how storage conditions determine their shelf life. The storage stability, as measured by consumer assessments and chemical measures, of raw almonds was determined for samples stored in cardboard boxes and polypropylene packaging for 2 years at 4, 15, 25, and 35 °C, and at 50% and 65% relative humidity (RH). Samples stored in unlined cartons always failed (>25% rejection) before their counterparts stored in polypropylene bags under identical environmental conditions. Models determined that polypropylene packaging (as opposed to unlined cardboard cartons) extended the time until sample rejection by more than 7 months. Temperature and RH were both negatively associated with storage time until failure. Flavor was a greater contributor to consumer acceptability than texture or odor, while peroxide values and free fatty acids were of greater importance in predicting raw almond consumer quality than measures of conjugated dienes or 2‐thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The results of this study will allow almond producers to determine packaging types and environmental storage conditions that provide shelf life of a specified time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5969087
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59690872018-05-30 Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period Pleasance, Emily A. Kerr, William L. Pegg, Ronald B. Swanson, Ruthann B. Cheely, Anna N. Huang, Guangwei Parrish, Daniel R. Kerrihard, Adrian L. J Food Sci Sensory and Food Quality ABSTRACT: Raw almonds are a major commodity, yet much is unknown about how storage conditions determine their shelf life. The storage stability, as measured by consumer assessments and chemical measures, of raw almonds was determined for samples stored in cardboard boxes and polypropylene packaging for 2 years at 4, 15, 25, and 35 °C, and at 50% and 65% relative humidity (RH). Samples stored in unlined cartons always failed (>25% rejection) before their counterparts stored in polypropylene bags under identical environmental conditions. Models determined that polypropylene packaging (as opposed to unlined cardboard cartons) extended the time until sample rejection by more than 7 months. Temperature and RH were both negatively associated with storage time until failure. Flavor was a greater contributor to consumer acceptability than texture or odor, while peroxide values and free fatty acids were of greater importance in predicting raw almond consumer quality than measures of conjugated dienes or 2‐thiobarbituric acid‐reactive substances. PRACTICAL APPLICATION: The results of this study will allow almond producers to determine packaging types and environmental storage conditions that provide shelf life of a specified time. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2018-01-22 2018-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5969087/ /pubmed/29355948 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14055 Text en © 2018 The Authors Journal of Food Science published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Institute of Food Technologists. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Sensory and Food Quality
Pleasance, Emily A.
Kerr, William L.
Pegg, Ronald B.
Swanson, Ruthann B.
Cheely, Anna N.
Huang, Guangwei
Parrish, Daniel R.
Kerrihard, Adrian L.
Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period
title Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period
title_full Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period
title_fullStr Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period
title_short Effects of Storage Conditions on Consumer and Chemical Assessments of Raw ‘Nonpareil’ Almonds Over a Two‐Year Period
title_sort effects of storage conditions on consumer and chemical assessments of raw ‘nonpareil’ almonds over a two‐year period
topic Sensory and Food Quality
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5969087/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29355948
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14055
work_keys_str_mv AT pleasanceemilya effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod
AT kerrwilliaml effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod
AT peggronaldb effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod
AT swansonruthannb effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod
AT cheelyannan effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod
AT huangguangwei effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod
AT parrishdanielr effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod
AT kerrihardadrianl effectsofstorageconditionsonconsumerandchemicalassessmentsofrawnonpareilalmondsoveratwoyearperiod