Cargando…

PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation

Progressively more qPCR assays have been developed in recent years in numerous fields of application. These assays are routinely validated using calibration curves, but essential validation per se such as Poisson analysis is frequently neglected. However, validation is crucial for determination of r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Witte, Anna Kristina, Mester, Patrick, Fister, Susanne, Süß, Beate, Wagner, Martin, Rossmanith, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26116-x
_version_ 1783326799326871552
author Witte, Anna Kristina
Mester, Patrick
Fister, Susanne
Süß, Beate
Wagner, Martin
Rossmanith, Peter
author_facet Witte, Anna Kristina
Mester, Patrick
Fister, Susanne
Süß, Beate
Wagner, Martin
Rossmanith, Peter
author_sort Witte, Anna Kristina
collection PubMed
description Progressively more qPCR assays have been developed in recent years in numerous fields of application. These assays are routinely validated using calibration curves, but essential validation per se such as Poisson analysis is frequently neglected. However, validation is crucial for determination of resolution and quantitative and qualitative limits. The new test method PCR-Stop analysis presented in this work investigates assay performance during initial qPCR cycles. PCRs with one to five pre-runs are performed while the subsequent main qPCR runs reflect pre-run replication rates. Ideally, DNA doubles according to pre-runs, there is no variation between replicates and qPCR starts immediately at the first cycle with its average efficiency. This study shows two exemplary qPCR assays, both with suitable calibration curves and efficiencies. We demonstrated thereby the benefits of PCR-Stop analysis revealing quantitative and qualitative resolution of both assays, the limits of one of those assays and thus avoiding misinterpretations in qPCR analysis. Furthermore, data displayed that a well performing assay starts indeed with its average efficiency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5974342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59743422018-05-31 PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation Witte, Anna Kristina Mester, Patrick Fister, Susanne Süß, Beate Wagner, Martin Rossmanith, Peter Sci Rep Article Progressively more qPCR assays have been developed in recent years in numerous fields of application. These assays are routinely validated using calibration curves, but essential validation per se such as Poisson analysis is frequently neglected. However, validation is crucial for determination of resolution and quantitative and qualitative limits. The new test method PCR-Stop analysis presented in this work investigates assay performance during initial qPCR cycles. PCRs with one to five pre-runs are performed while the subsequent main qPCR runs reflect pre-run replication rates. Ideally, DNA doubles according to pre-runs, there is no variation between replicates and qPCR starts immediately at the first cycle with its average efficiency. This study shows two exemplary qPCR assays, both with suitable calibration curves and efficiencies. We demonstrated thereby the benefits of PCR-Stop analysis revealing quantitative and qualitative resolution of both assays, the limits of one of those assays and thus avoiding misinterpretations in qPCR analysis. Furthermore, data displayed that a well performing assay starts indeed with its average efficiency. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5974342/ /pubmed/29844518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26116-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Witte, Anna Kristina
Mester, Patrick
Fister, Susanne
Süß, Beate
Wagner, Martin
Rossmanith, Peter
PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation
title PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation
title_full PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation
title_fullStr PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation
title_full_unstemmed PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation
title_short PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation
title_sort pcr-stop analysis as a new tool for qpcr assay validation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26116-x
work_keys_str_mv AT witteannakristina pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation
AT mesterpatrick pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation
AT fistersusanne pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation
AT sußbeate pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation
AT wagnermartin pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation
AT rossmanithpeter pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation