Cargando…
PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation
Progressively more qPCR assays have been developed in recent years in numerous fields of application. These assays are routinely validated using calibration curves, but essential validation per se such as Poisson analysis is frequently neglected. However, validation is crucial for determination of r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26116-x |
_version_ | 1783326799326871552 |
---|---|
author | Witte, Anna Kristina Mester, Patrick Fister, Susanne Süß, Beate Wagner, Martin Rossmanith, Peter |
author_facet | Witte, Anna Kristina Mester, Patrick Fister, Susanne Süß, Beate Wagner, Martin Rossmanith, Peter |
author_sort | Witte, Anna Kristina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Progressively more qPCR assays have been developed in recent years in numerous fields of application. These assays are routinely validated using calibration curves, but essential validation per se such as Poisson analysis is frequently neglected. However, validation is crucial for determination of resolution and quantitative and qualitative limits. The new test method PCR-Stop analysis presented in this work investigates assay performance during initial qPCR cycles. PCRs with one to five pre-runs are performed while the subsequent main qPCR runs reflect pre-run replication rates. Ideally, DNA doubles according to pre-runs, there is no variation between replicates and qPCR starts immediately at the first cycle with its average efficiency. This study shows two exemplary qPCR assays, both with suitable calibration curves and efficiencies. We demonstrated thereby the benefits of PCR-Stop analysis revealing quantitative and qualitative resolution of both assays, the limits of one of those assays and thus avoiding misinterpretations in qPCR analysis. Furthermore, data displayed that a well performing assay starts indeed with its average efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5974342 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59743422018-05-31 PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation Witte, Anna Kristina Mester, Patrick Fister, Susanne Süß, Beate Wagner, Martin Rossmanith, Peter Sci Rep Article Progressively more qPCR assays have been developed in recent years in numerous fields of application. These assays are routinely validated using calibration curves, but essential validation per se such as Poisson analysis is frequently neglected. However, validation is crucial for determination of resolution and quantitative and qualitative limits. The new test method PCR-Stop analysis presented in this work investigates assay performance during initial qPCR cycles. PCRs with one to five pre-runs are performed while the subsequent main qPCR runs reflect pre-run replication rates. Ideally, DNA doubles according to pre-runs, there is no variation between replicates and qPCR starts immediately at the first cycle with its average efficiency. This study shows two exemplary qPCR assays, both with suitable calibration curves and efficiencies. We demonstrated thereby the benefits of PCR-Stop analysis revealing quantitative and qualitative resolution of both assays, the limits of one of those assays and thus avoiding misinterpretations in qPCR analysis. Furthermore, data displayed that a well performing assay starts indeed with its average efficiency. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC5974342/ /pubmed/29844518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26116-x Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Witte, Anna Kristina Mester, Patrick Fister, Susanne Süß, Beate Wagner, Martin Rossmanith, Peter PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation |
title | PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation |
title_full | PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation |
title_fullStr | PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation |
title_full_unstemmed | PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation |
title_short | PCR-Stop analysis as a new tool for qPCR assay validation |
title_sort | pcr-stop analysis as a new tool for qpcr assay validation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974342/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29844518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26116-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT witteannakristina pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation AT mesterpatrick pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation AT fistersusanne pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation AT sußbeate pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation AT wagnermartin pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation AT rossmanithpeter pcrstopanalysisasanewtoolforqpcrassayvalidation |