Cargando…
Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION: Increasing the frequency of blood glucose monitoring aids the evaluation of glycemic variability and blood glucose control by antidiabetic drugs. It remains unclear, however, whether GLP-1 receptor agonists or basal insulin has a better effect on glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Healthcare
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0412-6 |
_version_ | 1783328678393937920 |
---|---|
author | Yin, Ting-Ting Bi, Yan Li, Ping Shen, Shan-Mei Xiong, Xiao-Lu Gao, Li-Jun Jiang, Can Wang, Yan Feng, Wen-Huan Zhu, Da-Long |
author_facet | Yin, Ting-Ting Bi, Yan Li, Ping Shen, Shan-Mei Xiong, Xiao-Lu Gao, Li-Jun Jiang, Can Wang, Yan Feng, Wen-Huan Zhu, Da-Long |
author_sort | Yin, Ting-Ting |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Increasing the frequency of blood glucose monitoring aids the evaluation of glycemic variability and blood glucose control by antidiabetic drugs. It remains unclear, however, whether GLP-1 receptor agonists or basal insulin has a better effect on glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients who are inadequately controlled by metformin. We used a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to compare patients on a GLP-1 receptor agonist with patients on basal insulin in terms of glycemic variability. METHODS: This prospective randomized study assigned T2DM patients treated with metformin (N = 39) to either exenatide treatment or insulin glargine treatment for 16 weeks. Glycemic variability was assessed using a CGMS; hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), β-cell function, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean blood glucose level, continuous overlapping net glycemic action, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, percentage of the time that the blood glucose value was > 10.0 mmol/L, and highest blood glucose level (P < 0.01–0.05) significantly decreased in both groups. Standard deviation of the mean glucose value, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions, and waist circumference significantly decreased for those treated with exenatide (P < 0.05), while no changes were observed with insulin glargine treatment. Percentage of the time that the blood glucose value was > 7.8 mmol/L decreased after insulin glargine use (P < 0.05) but not with the exenatide intervention. Similar decreases in fasting blood glucose and HbA1c and increases in the 1/homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, disposition index 30, and disposition index 120 were observed in both groups (P < 0.01–0.05). Reductions in weight and BMI were greater with exenatide than with insulin glargine treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In overweight and obese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled by metformin, exenatide and insulin glargine have similar efficacies in terms of glycemic variability, HbA1c alleviation, and β-cell function, but exenatide has a greater effect on body weight and BMI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5984915 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Springer Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59849152018-06-13 Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial Yin, Ting-Ting Bi, Yan Li, Ping Shen, Shan-Mei Xiong, Xiao-Lu Gao, Li-Jun Jiang, Can Wang, Yan Feng, Wen-Huan Zhu, Da-Long Diabetes Ther Original Research INTRODUCTION: Increasing the frequency of blood glucose monitoring aids the evaluation of glycemic variability and blood glucose control by antidiabetic drugs. It remains unclear, however, whether GLP-1 receptor agonists or basal insulin has a better effect on glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients who are inadequately controlled by metformin. We used a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) to compare patients on a GLP-1 receptor agonist with patients on basal insulin in terms of glycemic variability. METHODS: This prospective randomized study assigned T2DM patients treated with metformin (N = 39) to either exenatide treatment or insulin glargine treatment for 16 weeks. Glycemic variability was assessed using a CGMS; hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), β-cell function, weight, body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference were also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean blood glucose level, continuous overlapping net glycemic action, mean amplitude of glycemic excursions, percentage of the time that the blood glucose value was > 10.0 mmol/L, and highest blood glucose level (P < 0.01–0.05) significantly decreased in both groups. Standard deviation of the mean glucose value, largest amplitude of glycemic excursions, and waist circumference significantly decreased for those treated with exenatide (P < 0.05), while no changes were observed with insulin glargine treatment. Percentage of the time that the blood glucose value was > 7.8 mmol/L decreased after insulin glargine use (P < 0.05) but not with the exenatide intervention. Similar decreases in fasting blood glucose and HbA1c and increases in the 1/homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance, disposition index 30, and disposition index 120 were observed in both groups (P < 0.01–0.05). Reductions in weight and BMI were greater with exenatide than with insulin glargine treatment (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In overweight and obese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled by metformin, exenatide and insulin glargine have similar efficacies in terms of glycemic variability, HbA1c alleviation, and β-cell function, but exenatide has a greater effect on body weight and BMI. Springer Healthcare 2018-05-09 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5984915/ /pubmed/29744819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0412-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Yin, Ting-Ting Bi, Yan Li, Ping Shen, Shan-Mei Xiong, Xiao-Lu Gao, Li-Jun Jiang, Can Wang, Yan Feng, Wen-Huan Zhu, Da-Long Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Comparison of Glycemic Variability in Chinese T2DM Patients Treated with Exenatide or Insulin Glargine: A Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | comparison of glycemic variability in chinese t2dm patients treated with exenatide or insulin glargine: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984915/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29744819 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-018-0412-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yintingting comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT biyan comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liping comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT shenshanmei comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xiongxiaolu comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT gaolijun comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jiangcan comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wangyan comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fengwenhuan comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhudalong comparisonofglycemicvariabilityinchineset2dmpatientstreatedwithexenatideorinsulinglarginearandomizedcontrolledtrial |