Cargando…

The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion

BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) has been shown to alleviate some symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage and has been suggested to increase range of motion (ROM) without negatively impacting strength. However, it is unclear what neuromuscular effects, if any, mediate these changes. METHODS: In a ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Macgregor, Lewis J., Fairweather, Malcolm M., Bennett, Ryan M., Hunter, Angus M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29884972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0141-4
_version_ 1783330261656666112
author Macgregor, Lewis J.
Fairweather, Malcolm M.
Bennett, Ryan M.
Hunter, Angus M.
author_facet Macgregor, Lewis J.
Fairweather, Malcolm M.
Bennett, Ryan M.
Hunter, Angus M.
author_sort Macgregor, Lewis J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) has been shown to alleviate some symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage and has been suggested to increase range of motion (ROM) without negatively impacting strength. However, it is unclear what neuromuscular effects, if any, mediate these changes. METHODS: In a randomized, crossover design, 16 healthy active males completed 2 min of rest or FR of the knee extensors on three consecutive days. Mechanical properties of vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) were assessed via Tensiomyography. Knee extension maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and knee flexion ROM were also assessed, and surface electromyography amplitude (RMS) was recorded during a submaximal isometric contraction (50% of MVC). Measures were performed before and after (0, 15, and 30 min) FR or rest. RESULTS: MVC was reduced on subsequent days in the rest condition compared to FR (p = 0.002, (p)η(2) = 0.04); ROM was not different across time or condition (p = 0.193, (p)η(2) = 0.01). Stiffness characteristics of the VL were different on the third day of FR (p = 0.002, (p)η(2) = 0.03). RMS was statistically reduced 0, 15, and 30 min after FR compared to rest (p = 0.006, (p)η(2) = 0.03; p = 0.003, (p)η(2) = 0.04; p = 0.002, (p)η(2) = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Following FR, MVC was elevated compared to rest and RMS was transiently reduced during a submaximal task. Excitation efficiency of the involved muscles may have been enhanced by FR, which protected against the decline in MVC which was observed with rest.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5993692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59936922018-06-22 The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion Macgregor, Lewis J. Fairweather, Malcolm M. Bennett, Ryan M. Hunter, Angus M. Sports Med Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Foam rolling (FR) has been shown to alleviate some symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage and has been suggested to increase range of motion (ROM) without negatively impacting strength. However, it is unclear what neuromuscular effects, if any, mediate these changes. METHODS: In a randomized, crossover design, 16 healthy active males completed 2 min of rest or FR of the knee extensors on three consecutive days. Mechanical properties of vastus lateralis (VL) and rectus femoris (RF) were assessed via Tensiomyography. Knee extension maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) and knee flexion ROM were also assessed, and surface electromyography amplitude (RMS) was recorded during a submaximal isometric contraction (50% of MVC). Measures were performed before and after (0, 15, and 30 min) FR or rest. RESULTS: MVC was reduced on subsequent days in the rest condition compared to FR (p = 0.002, (p)η(2) = 0.04); ROM was not different across time or condition (p = 0.193, (p)η(2) = 0.01). Stiffness characteristics of the VL were different on the third day of FR (p = 0.002, (p)η(2) = 0.03). RMS was statistically reduced 0, 15, and 30 min after FR compared to rest (p = 0.006, (p)η(2) = 0.03; p = 0.003, (p)η(2) = 0.04; p = 0.002, (p)η(2) = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Following FR, MVC was elevated compared to rest and RMS was transiently reduced during a submaximal task. Excitation efficiency of the involved muscles may have been enhanced by FR, which protected against the decline in MVC which was observed with rest. Springer International Publishing 2018-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5993692/ /pubmed/29884972 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0141-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Macgregor, Lewis J.
Fairweather, Malcolm M.
Bennett, Ryan M.
Hunter, Angus M.
The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion
title The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion
title_full The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion
title_fullStr The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion
title_short The Effect of Foam Rolling for Three Consecutive Days on Muscular Efficiency and Range of Motion
title_sort effect of foam rolling for three consecutive days on muscular efficiency and range of motion
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5993692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29884972
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40798-018-0141-4
work_keys_str_mv AT macgregorlewisj theeffectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion
AT fairweathermalcolmm theeffectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion
AT bennettryanm theeffectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion
AT hunterangusm theeffectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion
AT macgregorlewisj effectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion
AT fairweathermalcolmm effectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion
AT bennettryanm effectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion
AT hunterangusm effectoffoamrollingforthreeconsecutivedaysonmuscularefficiencyandrangeofmotion