Cargando…

A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM

Active learning with clickers is a common approach in high-enrollment, lecture-based courses in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In this study, we describe the procedures that faculty at one institution used when implementing clicker-based active learning, and how they situated the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solomon, Erin D., Repice, Michelle D., Mutambuki, Jacinta M., Leonard, Denise A., Cohen, Cheryl A., Luo, Jia, Frey, Regina F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29786474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180
_version_ 1783331223068737536
author Solomon, Erin D.
Repice, Michelle D.
Mutambuki, Jacinta M.
Leonard, Denise A.
Cohen, Cheryl A.
Luo, Jia
Frey, Regina F.
author_facet Solomon, Erin D.
Repice, Michelle D.
Mutambuki, Jacinta M.
Leonard, Denise A.
Cohen, Cheryl A.
Luo, Jia
Frey, Regina F.
author_sort Solomon, Erin D.
collection PubMed
description Active learning with clickers is a common approach in high-enrollment, lecture-based courses in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In this study, we describe the procedures that faculty at one institution used when implementing clicker-based active learning, and how they situated these activities in their class sessions. Using a mixed-methods approach, we categorized faculty into four implementation styles based on quantitative observation data and conducted qualitative interviews to further understand why faculty used these styles. We found that faculty tended to use similar procedures when implementing a clicker activity, but differed on how they situated the clicker-based active learning into their courses. These variations were attributed to different faculty goals for using clicker-based active learning, with some using it to engage students at specific time points throughout their class sessions and others who selected it as the best way to teach a concept from several possible teaching techniques. Future research should continue to investigate and describe how active-learning strategies from literature may differ from what is being implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998309
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59983092018-07-02 A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM Solomon, Erin D. Repice, Michelle D. Mutambuki, Jacinta M. Leonard, Denise A. Cohen, Cheryl A. Luo, Jia Frey, Regina F. CBE Life Sci Educ Article Active learning with clickers is a common approach in high-enrollment, lecture-based courses in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. In this study, we describe the procedures that faculty at one institution used when implementing clicker-based active learning, and how they situated these activities in their class sessions. Using a mixed-methods approach, we categorized faculty into four implementation styles based on quantitative observation data and conducted qualitative interviews to further understand why faculty used these styles. We found that faculty tended to use similar procedures when implementing a clicker activity, but differed on how they situated the clicker-based active learning into their courses. These variations were attributed to different faculty goals for using clicker-based active learning, with some using it to engage students at specific time points throughout their class sessions and others who selected it as the best way to teach a concept from several possible teaching techniques. Future research should continue to investigate and describe how active-learning strategies from literature may differ from what is being implemented. American Society for Cell Biology 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5998309/ /pubmed/29786474 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180 Text en © 2018 E. D. Solomon et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2018 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Article
Solomon, Erin D.
Repice, Michelle D.
Mutambuki, Jacinta M.
Leonard, Denise A.
Cohen, Cheryl A.
Luo, Jia
Frey, Regina F.
A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM
title A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM
title_full A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM
title_fullStr A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM
title_full_unstemmed A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM
title_short A Mixed-Methods Investigation of Clicker Implementation Styles in STEM
title_sort mixed-methods investigation of clicker implementation styles in stem
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998309/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29786474
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0180
work_keys_str_mv AT solomonerind amixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT repicemichelled amixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT mutambukijacintam amixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT leonarddenisea amixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT cohencheryla amixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT luojia amixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT freyreginaf amixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT solomonerind mixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT repicemichelled mixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT mutambukijacintam mixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT leonarddenisea mixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT cohencheryla mixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT luojia mixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem
AT freyreginaf mixedmethodsinvestigationofclickerimplementationstylesinstem