Cargando…

Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work

Instructors communicate what they value about students’ written work through their comments and feedback, and this feedback has the potential to direct how students approach writing assignments. In this study, we examined how graduate student teaching assistants (TAs) attended and responded to stude...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hill, Cynthia F. C., Gouvea, Julia S., Hammer, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Society for Cell Biology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0070
_version_ 1783331224485363712
author Hill, Cynthia F. C.
Gouvea, Julia S.
Hammer, David
author_facet Hill, Cynthia F. C.
Gouvea, Julia S.
Hammer, David
author_sort Hill, Cynthia F. C.
collection PubMed
description Instructors communicate what they value about students’ written work through their comments and feedback, and this feedback has the potential to direct how students approach writing assignments. In this study, we examined how graduate student teaching assistants (TAs) attended and responded to students’ written lab reports in an introductory biology course. We collected and analyzed marked lab reports from five TAs and interviewed them about their marking decisions. The results show that TAs attended mainly to writing style and form in their markings and comments on lab reports. However, there were occasions when they attended to students’ scientific reasoning in their markings and during interviews. We provide evidence that TAs’ understanding of the purpose of the laboratory course and assessment structure influenced their attention. We also provide evidence that TAs could shift their attention from style and form to reasoning in response to moment-to-moment contextual cues. Building on these results, we discuss course design and professional development that reframes labs and reports to focus on students’ biological reasoning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5998315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Society for Cell Biology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-59983152018-07-02 Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work Hill, Cynthia F. C. Gouvea, Julia S. Hammer, David CBE Life Sci Educ Article Instructors communicate what they value about students’ written work through their comments and feedback, and this feedback has the potential to direct how students approach writing assignments. In this study, we examined how graduate student teaching assistants (TAs) attended and responded to students’ written lab reports in an introductory biology course. We collected and analyzed marked lab reports from five TAs and interviewed them about their marking decisions. The results show that TAs attended mainly to writing style and form in their markings and comments on lab reports. However, there were occasions when they attended to students’ scientific reasoning in their markings and during interviews. We provide evidence that TAs’ understanding of the purpose of the laboratory course and assessment structure influenced their attention. We also provide evidence that TAs could shift their attention from style and form to reasoning in response to moment-to-moment contextual cues. Building on these results, we discuss course design and professional development that reframes labs and reports to focus on students’ biological reasoning. American Society for Cell Biology 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5998315/ /pubmed/29749844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0070 Text en © 2018 C. F. C. Hill et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2018 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License.
spellingShingle Article
Hill, Cynthia F. C.
Gouvea, Julia S.
Hammer, David
Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work
title Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work
title_full Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work
title_fullStr Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work
title_full_unstemmed Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work
title_short Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work
title_sort teaching assistant attention and responsiveness to student reasoning in written work
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0070
work_keys_str_mv AT hillcynthiafc teachingassistantattentionandresponsivenesstostudentreasoninginwrittenwork
AT gouveajulias teachingassistantattentionandresponsivenesstostudentreasoninginwrittenwork
AT hammerdavid teachingassistantattentionandresponsivenesstostudentreasoninginwrittenwork