Cargando…
Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work
Instructors communicate what they value about students’ written work through their comments and feedback, and this feedback has the potential to direct how students approach writing assignments. In this study, we examined how graduate student teaching assistants (TAs) attended and responded to stude...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Society for Cell Biology
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0070 |
_version_ | 1783331224485363712 |
---|---|
author | Hill, Cynthia F. C. Gouvea, Julia S. Hammer, David |
author_facet | Hill, Cynthia F. C. Gouvea, Julia S. Hammer, David |
author_sort | Hill, Cynthia F. C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Instructors communicate what they value about students’ written work through their comments and feedback, and this feedback has the potential to direct how students approach writing assignments. In this study, we examined how graduate student teaching assistants (TAs) attended and responded to students’ written lab reports in an introductory biology course. We collected and analyzed marked lab reports from five TAs and interviewed them about their marking decisions. The results show that TAs attended mainly to writing style and form in their markings and comments on lab reports. However, there were occasions when they attended to students’ scientific reasoning in their markings and during interviews. We provide evidence that TAs’ understanding of the purpose of the laboratory course and assessment structure influenced their attention. We also provide evidence that TAs could shift their attention from style and form to reasoning in response to moment-to-moment contextual cues. Building on these results, we discuss course design and professional development that reframes labs and reports to focus on students’ biological reasoning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5998315 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Society for Cell Biology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-59983152018-07-02 Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work Hill, Cynthia F. C. Gouvea, Julia S. Hammer, David CBE Life Sci Educ Article Instructors communicate what they value about students’ written work through their comments and feedback, and this feedback has the potential to direct how students approach writing assignments. In this study, we examined how graduate student teaching assistants (TAs) attended and responded to students’ written lab reports in an introductory biology course. We collected and analyzed marked lab reports from five TAs and interviewed them about their marking decisions. The results show that TAs attended mainly to writing style and form in their markings and comments on lab reports. However, there were occasions when they attended to students’ scientific reasoning in their markings and during interviews. We provide evidence that TAs’ understanding of the purpose of the laboratory course and assessment structure influenced their attention. We also provide evidence that TAs could shift their attention from style and form to reasoning in response to moment-to-moment contextual cues. Building on these results, we discuss course design and professional development that reframes labs and reports to focus on students’ biological reasoning. American Society for Cell Biology 2018 /pmc/articles/PMC5998315/ /pubmed/29749844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0070 Text en © 2018 C. F. C. Hill et al. CBE—Life Sciences Education © 2018 The American Society for Cell Biology. “ASCB®” and “The American Society for Cell Biology®” are registered trademarks of The American Society for Cell Biology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This article is distributed by The American Society for Cell Biology under license from the author(s). It is available to the public under an Attribution–Noncommercial–Share Alike 3.0 Unported Creative Commons License. |
spellingShingle | Article Hill, Cynthia F. C. Gouvea, Julia S. Hammer, David Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work |
title | Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work |
title_full | Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work |
title_fullStr | Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work |
title_full_unstemmed | Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work |
title_short | Teaching Assistant Attention and Responsiveness to Student Reasoning in Written Work |
title_sort | teaching assistant attention and responsiveness to student reasoning in written work |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5998315/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29749844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hillcynthiafc teachingassistantattentionandresponsivenesstostudentreasoninginwrittenwork AT gouveajulias teachingassistantattentionandresponsivenesstostudentreasoninginwrittenwork AT hammerdavid teachingassistantattentionandresponsivenesstostudentreasoninginwrittenwork |