Cargando…

When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process

INTRODUCTION: Clinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Duijn, Chantal C. M. A., Welink, Lisanne S., Bok, Harold G. J., ten Cate, Olle T. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0430-0
_version_ 1783332170609197056
author Duijn, Chantal C. M. A.
Welink, Lisanne S.
Bok, Harold G. J.
ten Cate, Olle T. J.
author_facet Duijn, Chantal C. M. A.
Welink, Lisanne S.
Bok, Harold G. J.
ten Cate, Olle T. J.
author_sort Duijn, Chantal C. M. A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Clinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that clinical teachers find relevant in the elaboration of the entrustment decision processes. The findings can substantiate entrustment decision-making in the clinical workplace. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with medical and veterinary clinical teachers, using the structured consensus method of the Nominal Group Technique to generate decision variables. A ranking was made based on a relevance score assigned by the clinical teachers to the different decision variables. Field notes, audio recordings and flip chart lists were analyzed and subsequently translated and, as a form of axial coding, merged into one list, combining the decision variables that were similar in their meaning. RESULTS: A list of 11 and 17 decision variables were acknowledged as relevant by the medical and veterinary teacher groups, respectively. The focus groups yielded 21 unique decision variables that were considered relevant to inform readiness to perform a clinical task on a designated level of supervision. The decision variables consisted of skills, generic qualities, characteristics, previous performance or other information. We were able to group the decision variables into five categories: ability, humility, integrity, reliability and adequate exposure. DISCUSSION: To entrust a learner to perform a task at a specific level of supervision, a supervisor needs information to support such a judgement. This trust cannot be credited on a single case at a single moment of assessment, but requires different variables and multiple sources of information. This study provides an overview of decision variables giving evidence to justify the multifactorial process of making an entrustment decision.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6002285
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60022852018-06-28 When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process Duijn, Chantal C. M. A. Welink, Lisanne S. Bok, Harold G. J. ten Cate, Olle T. J. Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: Clinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that clinical teachers find relevant in the elaboration of the entrustment decision processes. The findings can substantiate entrustment decision-making in the clinical workplace. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with medical and veterinary clinical teachers, using the structured consensus method of the Nominal Group Technique to generate decision variables. A ranking was made based on a relevance score assigned by the clinical teachers to the different decision variables. Field notes, audio recordings and flip chart lists were analyzed and subsequently translated and, as a form of axial coding, merged into one list, combining the decision variables that were similar in their meaning. RESULTS: A list of 11 and 17 decision variables were acknowledged as relevant by the medical and veterinary teacher groups, respectively. The focus groups yielded 21 unique decision variables that were considered relevant to inform readiness to perform a clinical task on a designated level of supervision. The decision variables consisted of skills, generic qualities, characteristics, previous performance or other information. We were able to group the decision variables into five categories: ability, humility, integrity, reliability and adequate exposure. DISCUSSION: To entrust a learner to perform a task at a specific level of supervision, a supervisor needs information to support such a judgement. This trust cannot be credited on a single case at a single moment of assessment, but requires different variables and multiple sources of information. This study provides an overview of decision variables giving evidence to justify the multifactorial process of making an entrustment decision. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2018-04-30 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6002285/ /pubmed/29713908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0430-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Duijn, Chantal C. M. A.
Welink, Lisanne S.
Bok, Harold G. J.
ten Cate, Olle T. J.
When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
title When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
title_full When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
title_fullStr When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
title_full_unstemmed When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
title_short When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
title_sort when to trust our learners? clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002285/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713908
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0430-0
work_keys_str_mv AT duijnchantalcma whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess
AT welinklisannes whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess
AT bokharoldgj whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess
AT tencateolletj whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess