Cargando…
When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process
INTRODUCTION: Clinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0430-0 |
_version_ | 1783332170609197056 |
---|---|
author | Duijn, Chantal C. M. A. Welink, Lisanne S. Bok, Harold G. J. ten Cate, Olle T. J. |
author_facet | Duijn, Chantal C. M. A. Welink, Lisanne S. Bok, Harold G. J. ten Cate, Olle T. J. |
author_sort | Duijn, Chantal C. M. A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Clinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that clinical teachers find relevant in the elaboration of the entrustment decision processes. The findings can substantiate entrustment decision-making in the clinical workplace. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with medical and veterinary clinical teachers, using the structured consensus method of the Nominal Group Technique to generate decision variables. A ranking was made based on a relevance score assigned by the clinical teachers to the different decision variables. Field notes, audio recordings and flip chart lists were analyzed and subsequently translated and, as a form of axial coding, merged into one list, combining the decision variables that were similar in their meaning. RESULTS: A list of 11 and 17 decision variables were acknowledged as relevant by the medical and veterinary teacher groups, respectively. The focus groups yielded 21 unique decision variables that were considered relevant to inform readiness to perform a clinical task on a designated level of supervision. The decision variables consisted of skills, generic qualities, characteristics, previous performance or other information. We were able to group the decision variables into five categories: ability, humility, integrity, reliability and adequate exposure. DISCUSSION: To entrust a learner to perform a task at a specific level of supervision, a supervisor needs information to support such a judgement. This trust cannot be credited on a single case at a single moment of assessment, but requires different variables and multiple sources of information. This study provides an overview of decision variables giving evidence to justify the multifactorial process of making an entrustment decision. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6002285 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60022852018-06-28 When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process Duijn, Chantal C. M. A. Welink, Lisanne S. Bok, Harold G. J. ten Cate, Olle T. J. Perspect Med Educ Original Article INTRODUCTION: Clinical training programs increasingly use entrustable professional activities (EPAs) as focus of assessment. However, questions remain about which information should ground decisions to trust learners. This qualitative study aimed to identify decision variables in the workplace that clinical teachers find relevant in the elaboration of the entrustment decision processes. The findings can substantiate entrustment decision-making in the clinical workplace. METHODS: Focus groups were conducted with medical and veterinary clinical teachers, using the structured consensus method of the Nominal Group Technique to generate decision variables. A ranking was made based on a relevance score assigned by the clinical teachers to the different decision variables. Field notes, audio recordings and flip chart lists were analyzed and subsequently translated and, as a form of axial coding, merged into one list, combining the decision variables that were similar in their meaning. RESULTS: A list of 11 and 17 decision variables were acknowledged as relevant by the medical and veterinary teacher groups, respectively. The focus groups yielded 21 unique decision variables that were considered relevant to inform readiness to perform a clinical task on a designated level of supervision. The decision variables consisted of skills, generic qualities, characteristics, previous performance or other information. We were able to group the decision variables into five categories: ability, humility, integrity, reliability and adequate exposure. DISCUSSION: To entrust a learner to perform a task at a specific level of supervision, a supervisor needs information to support such a judgement. This trust cannot be credited on a single case at a single moment of assessment, but requires different variables and multiple sources of information. This study provides an overview of decision variables giving evidence to justify the multifactorial process of making an entrustment decision. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2018-04-30 2018-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6002285/ /pubmed/29713908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0430-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Duijn, Chantal C. M. A. Welink, Lisanne S. Bok, Harold G. J. ten Cate, Olle T. J. When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process |
title | When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process |
title_full | When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process |
title_fullStr | When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process |
title_full_unstemmed | When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process |
title_short | When to trust our learners? Clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process |
title_sort | when to trust our learners? clinical teachers’ perceptions of decision variables in the entrustment process |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6002285/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713908 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40037-018-0430-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT duijnchantalcma whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess AT welinklisannes whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess AT bokharoldgj whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess AT tencateolletj whentotrustourlearnersclinicalteachersperceptionsofdecisionvariablesintheentrustmentprocess |