Cargando…

Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats

The purpose of this study was to compare core muscle activation during a prone bridge (plank) until failure and 6-RM back squats. Twelve resistance-trained males (age 23.5 ± 2.6 years, body mass 87.8 ± 21.3 kg, body height 1.81 ± 0.08 m) participated in this study. Total exercise time and EMG activi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van den Tillaar, Roland, Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0176
_version_ 1783332855046209536
author van den Tillaar, Roland
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
author_facet van den Tillaar, Roland
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
author_sort van den Tillaar, Roland
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to compare core muscle activation during a prone bridge (plank) until failure and 6-RM back squats. Twelve resistance-trained males (age 23.5 ± 2.6 years, body mass 87.8 ± 21.3 kg, body height 1.81 ± 0.08 m) participated in this study. Total exercise time and EMG activity of the rectus abdominis, external abdominal oblique and erector spinae were measured during 6-RM back squats and a prone bridge with a weight of 20% of participants’ body mass on their lower back. The main findings showed non-significant differences between the exercises in the rectus abdominis or external oblique, but greater erector spinae activation in squatting. Furthermore, in contrast to the prone bridge, the erector spinae and rectus abdominis demonstrated increasing muscle activation throughout the repetitions while squatting, whereas the prone bride demonstrated increasing external oblique activation between the beginning and the middle of the set. It was concluded that since squatting resulted in greater erector spine activation, but similar rectus abdominis and oblique external activation as the prone bridge, high-intensity squats rather than isometric low intensity core exercises for athletes would be recommended.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6006542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60065422018-06-19 Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats van den Tillaar, Roland Saeterbakken, Atle Hole J Hum Kinet Section I – Kinesiology The purpose of this study was to compare core muscle activation during a prone bridge (plank) until failure and 6-RM back squats. Twelve resistance-trained males (age 23.5 ± 2.6 years, body mass 87.8 ± 21.3 kg, body height 1.81 ± 0.08 m) participated in this study. Total exercise time and EMG activity of the rectus abdominis, external abdominal oblique and erector spinae were measured during 6-RM back squats and a prone bridge with a weight of 20% of participants’ body mass on their lower back. The main findings showed non-significant differences between the exercises in the rectus abdominis or external oblique, but greater erector spinae activation in squatting. Furthermore, in contrast to the prone bridge, the erector spinae and rectus abdominis demonstrated increasing muscle activation throughout the repetitions while squatting, whereas the prone bride demonstrated increasing external oblique activation between the beginning and the middle of the set. It was concluded that since squatting resulted in greater erector spine activation, but similar rectus abdominis and oblique external activation as the prone bridge, high-intensity squats rather than isometric low intensity core exercises for athletes would be recommended. Sciendo 2018-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC6006542/ /pubmed/29922376 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0176 Text en © 2018 Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section I – Kinesiology
van den Tillaar, Roland
Saeterbakken, Atle Hole
Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats
title Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats
title_full Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats
title_fullStr Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats
title_short Comparison of Core Muscle Activation between a Prone Bridge and 6-RM Back Squats
title_sort comparison of core muscle activation between a prone bridge and 6-rm back squats
topic Section I – Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6006542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29922376
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2017-0176
work_keys_str_mv AT vandentillaarroland comparisonofcoremuscleactivationbetweenapronebridgeand6rmbacksquats
AT saeterbakkenatlehole comparisonofcoremuscleactivationbetweenapronebridgeand6rmbacksquats