Cargando…
Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors?
A set of compounds incorporating carbon-based zinc-binding groups (ZBGs), of the type PhX (X = COOH, CONH(2), CONHNH(2), CONHOH, CONHOMe), and the corresponding derivatives with sulphur(VI)-based ZBGs (X = SO(3)H, SO(2)NH(2), SO(2)NHNH(2), SO(2)NHOH, SO(2)NHOMe) were tested as inhibitors of all mamm...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2018.1428572 |
_version_ | 1783333490420350976 |
---|---|
author | Supuran, Claudiu T. |
author_facet | Supuran, Claudiu T. |
author_sort | Supuran, Claudiu T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A set of compounds incorporating carbon-based zinc-binding groups (ZBGs), of the type PhX (X = COOH, CONH(2), CONHNH(2), CONHOH, CONHOMe), and the corresponding derivatives with sulphur(VI)-based ZBGs (X = SO(3)H, SO(2)NH(2), SO(2)NHNH(2), SO(2)NHOH, SO(2)NHOMe) were tested as inhibitors of all mammalian isoforms of carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1), CA I–XV. Three factors connected with the ZBG influenced the efficacy as CA inhibitor (CAI) of the investigated compounds: (i) the pKa of the ZBG; (ii) its geometry (tetrahedral, i.e. sulphur-based, versus trigonal, i.e. carbon-based ZBGs), and (iii) orientation of the organic scaffold induced by the nature of the ZBG. Benzenesulphonamide was the best inhibitor of all isoforms, but other ZBGs led to interesting inhibition profiles, although with an efficacy generally reduced when compared to the sulphonamide. The nature of the ZBG also influenced the CA inhibition mechanism. Most of these derivatives were zinc binders, but some of them (sulfonates, carboxylates) may interact with the enzyme by anchoring to the zinc-coordinated water molecule or by other inhibition mechanisms (occlusion of the active site entrance, out of the active site binding, etc.). Exploring structurally diverse ZBGs may lead to interesting new developments in the field of CAIs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6009921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Taylor & Francis |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60099212018-07-11 Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? Supuran, Claudiu T. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem Research Paper A set of compounds incorporating carbon-based zinc-binding groups (ZBGs), of the type PhX (X = COOH, CONH(2), CONHNH(2), CONHOH, CONHOMe), and the corresponding derivatives with sulphur(VI)-based ZBGs (X = SO(3)H, SO(2)NH(2), SO(2)NHNH(2), SO(2)NHOH, SO(2)NHOMe) were tested as inhibitors of all mammalian isoforms of carbonic anhydrase (CA, EC 4.2.1.1), CA I–XV. Three factors connected with the ZBG influenced the efficacy as CA inhibitor (CAI) of the investigated compounds: (i) the pKa of the ZBG; (ii) its geometry (tetrahedral, i.e. sulphur-based, versus trigonal, i.e. carbon-based ZBGs), and (iii) orientation of the organic scaffold induced by the nature of the ZBG. Benzenesulphonamide was the best inhibitor of all isoforms, but other ZBGs led to interesting inhibition profiles, although with an efficacy generally reduced when compared to the sulphonamide. The nature of the ZBG also influenced the CA inhibition mechanism. Most of these derivatives were zinc binders, but some of them (sulfonates, carboxylates) may interact with the enzyme by anchoring to the zinc-coordinated water molecule or by other inhibition mechanisms (occlusion of the active site entrance, out of the active site binding, etc.). Exploring structurally diverse ZBGs may lead to interesting new developments in the field of CAIs. Taylor & Francis 2018-02-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6009921/ /pubmed/29390912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2018.1428572 Text en © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Supuran, Claudiu T. Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? |
title | Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? |
title_full | Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? |
title_fullStr | Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? |
title_full_unstemmed | Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? |
title_short | Carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? |
title_sort | carbon- versus sulphur-based zinc binding groups for carbonic anhydrase inhibitors? |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6009921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29390912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2018.1428572 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT supuranclaudiut carbonversussulphurbasedzincbindinggroupsforcarbonicanhydraseinhibitors |