Cargando…
Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
BACKGROUND: The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium is generating null allele mice for every protein-coding gene in the genome and characterizing these mice to identify gene–phenotype associations. While CRISPR/Cas9-mediated null allele production in mice is highly efficient, generation of co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0 |
_version_ | 1783333808000466944 |
---|---|
author | Lanza, Denise G. Gaspero, Angelina Lorenzo, Isabel Liao, Lan Zheng, Ping Wang, Ying Deng, Yu Cheng, Chonghui Zhang, Chuansheng Seavitt, John R. DeMayo, Francesco J. Xu, Jianming Dickinson, Mary E. Beaudet, Arthur L. Heaney, Jason D. |
author_facet | Lanza, Denise G. Gaspero, Angelina Lorenzo, Isabel Liao, Lan Zheng, Ping Wang, Ying Deng, Yu Cheng, Chonghui Zhang, Chuansheng Seavitt, John R. DeMayo, Francesco J. Xu, Jianming Dickinson, Mary E. Beaudet, Arthur L. Heaney, Jason D. |
author_sort | Lanza, Denise G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium is generating null allele mice for every protein-coding gene in the genome and characterizing these mice to identify gene–phenotype associations. While CRISPR/Cas9-mediated null allele production in mice is highly efficient, generation of conditional alleles has proven to be more difficult. To test the feasibility of using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate conditional knockout mice for this large-scale resource, we employed Cas9-initiated homology-driven repair (HDR) with short and long single stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODNs and lssDNAs). RESULTS: Using pairs of single guide RNAs and short ssODNs to introduce loxP sites around a critical exon or exons, we obtained putative conditional allele founder mice, harboring both loxP sites, for 23 out of 30 targeted genes. LoxP sites integrated in cis in at least one mouse for 18 of 23 genes. However, loxP sites were mutagenized in 4 of the 18 in cis lines. HDR efficiency correlated with Cas9 cutting efficiency but was minimally influenced by ssODN homology arm symmetry. By contrast, using pairs of guides and single lssDNAs to introduce loxP-flanked exons, conditional allele founders were generated for all four genes targeted, although one founder was found to harbor undesired mutations within the lssDNA sequence interval. Importantly, when employing either ssODNs or lssDNAs, random integration events were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies demonstrate that Cas9-mediated HDR with pairs of ssODNs can generate conditional null alleles at many loci, but reveal inefficiencies when applied at scale. In contrast, lssDNAs are amenable to high-throughput production of conditional alleles when they can be employed. Regardless of the single-stranded donor utilized, it is essential to screen for sequence errors at sites of HDR and random insertion of donor sequences into the genome. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6011517 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-60115172018-07-05 Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles Lanza, Denise G. Gaspero, Angelina Lorenzo, Isabel Liao, Lan Zheng, Ping Wang, Ying Deng, Yu Cheng, Chonghui Zhang, Chuansheng Seavitt, John R. DeMayo, Francesco J. Xu, Jianming Dickinson, Mary E. Beaudet, Arthur L. Heaney, Jason D. BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium is generating null allele mice for every protein-coding gene in the genome and characterizing these mice to identify gene–phenotype associations. While CRISPR/Cas9-mediated null allele production in mice is highly efficient, generation of conditional alleles has proven to be more difficult. To test the feasibility of using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate conditional knockout mice for this large-scale resource, we employed Cas9-initiated homology-driven repair (HDR) with short and long single stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODNs and lssDNAs). RESULTS: Using pairs of single guide RNAs and short ssODNs to introduce loxP sites around a critical exon or exons, we obtained putative conditional allele founder mice, harboring both loxP sites, for 23 out of 30 targeted genes. LoxP sites integrated in cis in at least one mouse for 18 of 23 genes. However, loxP sites were mutagenized in 4 of the 18 in cis lines. HDR efficiency correlated with Cas9 cutting efficiency but was minimally influenced by ssODN homology arm symmetry. By contrast, using pairs of guides and single lssDNAs to introduce loxP-flanked exons, conditional allele founders were generated for all four genes targeted, although one founder was found to harbor undesired mutations within the lssDNA sequence interval. Importantly, when employing either ssODNs or lssDNAs, random integration events were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies demonstrate that Cas9-mediated HDR with pairs of ssODNs can generate conditional null alleles at many loci, but reveal inefficiencies when applied at scale. In contrast, lssDNAs are amenable to high-throughput production of conditional alleles when they can be employed. Regardless of the single-stranded donor utilized, it is essential to screen for sequence errors at sites of HDR and random insertion of donor sequences into the genome. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6011517/ /pubmed/29925370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0 Text en © Heaney et al. 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lanza, Denise G. Gaspero, Angelina Lorenzo, Isabel Liao, Lan Zheng, Ping Wang, Ying Deng, Yu Cheng, Chonghui Zhang, Chuansheng Seavitt, John R. DeMayo, Francesco J. Xu, Jianming Dickinson, Mary E. Beaudet, Arthur L. Heaney, Jason D. Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles |
title | Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles |
title_full | Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles |
title_short | Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles |
title_sort | comparative analysis of single-stranded dna donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011517/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanzadeniseg comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT gasperoangelina comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT lorenzoisabel comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT liaolan comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT zhengping comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT wangying comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT dengyu comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT chengchonghui comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT zhangchuansheng comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT seavittjohnr comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT demayofrancescoj comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT xujianming comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT dickinsonmarye comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT beaudetarthurl comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles AT heaneyjasond comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles |