Cargando…

Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles

BACKGROUND: The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium is generating null allele mice for every protein-coding gene in the genome and characterizing these mice to identify gene–phenotype associations. While CRISPR/Cas9-mediated null allele production in mice is highly efficient, generation of co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanza, Denise G., Gaspero, Angelina, Lorenzo, Isabel, Liao, Lan, Zheng, Ping, Wang, Ying, Deng, Yu, Cheng, Chonghui, Zhang, Chuansheng, Seavitt, John R., DeMayo, Francesco J., Xu, Jianming, Dickinson, Mary E., Beaudet, Arthur L., Heaney, Jason D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0
_version_ 1783333808000466944
author Lanza, Denise G.
Gaspero, Angelina
Lorenzo, Isabel
Liao, Lan
Zheng, Ping
Wang, Ying
Deng, Yu
Cheng, Chonghui
Zhang, Chuansheng
Seavitt, John R.
DeMayo, Francesco J.
Xu, Jianming
Dickinson, Mary E.
Beaudet, Arthur L.
Heaney, Jason D.
author_facet Lanza, Denise G.
Gaspero, Angelina
Lorenzo, Isabel
Liao, Lan
Zheng, Ping
Wang, Ying
Deng, Yu
Cheng, Chonghui
Zhang, Chuansheng
Seavitt, John R.
DeMayo, Francesco J.
Xu, Jianming
Dickinson, Mary E.
Beaudet, Arthur L.
Heaney, Jason D.
author_sort Lanza, Denise G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium is generating null allele mice for every protein-coding gene in the genome and characterizing these mice to identify gene–phenotype associations. While CRISPR/Cas9-mediated null allele production in mice is highly efficient, generation of conditional alleles has proven to be more difficult. To test the feasibility of using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate conditional knockout mice for this large-scale resource, we employed Cas9-initiated homology-driven repair (HDR) with short and long single stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODNs and lssDNAs). RESULTS: Using pairs of single guide RNAs and short ssODNs to introduce loxP sites around a critical exon or exons, we obtained putative conditional allele founder mice, harboring both loxP sites, for 23 out of 30 targeted genes. LoxP sites integrated in cis in at least one mouse for 18 of 23 genes. However, loxP sites were mutagenized in 4 of the 18 in cis lines. HDR efficiency correlated with Cas9 cutting efficiency but was minimally influenced by ssODN homology arm symmetry. By contrast, using pairs of guides and single lssDNAs to introduce loxP-flanked exons, conditional allele founders were generated for all four genes targeted, although one founder was found to harbor undesired mutations within the lssDNA sequence interval. Importantly, when employing either ssODNs or lssDNAs, random integration events were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies demonstrate that Cas9-mediated HDR with pairs of ssODNs can generate conditional null alleles at many loci, but reveal inefficiencies when applied at scale. In contrast, lssDNAs are amenable to high-throughput production of conditional alleles when they can be employed. Regardless of the single-stranded donor utilized, it is essential to screen for sequence errors at sites of HDR and random insertion of donor sequences into the genome. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6011517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60115172018-07-05 Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles Lanza, Denise G. Gaspero, Angelina Lorenzo, Isabel Liao, Lan Zheng, Ping Wang, Ying Deng, Yu Cheng, Chonghui Zhang, Chuansheng Seavitt, John R. DeMayo, Francesco J. Xu, Jianming Dickinson, Mary E. Beaudet, Arthur L. Heaney, Jason D. BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: The International Mouse Phenotyping Consortium is generating null allele mice for every protein-coding gene in the genome and characterizing these mice to identify gene–phenotype associations. While CRISPR/Cas9-mediated null allele production in mice is highly efficient, generation of conditional alleles has proven to be more difficult. To test the feasibility of using CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to generate conditional knockout mice for this large-scale resource, we employed Cas9-initiated homology-driven repair (HDR) with short and long single stranded oligodeoxynucleotides (ssODNs and lssDNAs). RESULTS: Using pairs of single guide RNAs and short ssODNs to introduce loxP sites around a critical exon or exons, we obtained putative conditional allele founder mice, harboring both loxP sites, for 23 out of 30 targeted genes. LoxP sites integrated in cis in at least one mouse for 18 of 23 genes. However, loxP sites were mutagenized in 4 of the 18 in cis lines. HDR efficiency correlated with Cas9 cutting efficiency but was minimally influenced by ssODN homology arm symmetry. By contrast, using pairs of guides and single lssDNAs to introduce loxP-flanked exons, conditional allele founders were generated for all four genes targeted, although one founder was found to harbor undesired mutations within the lssDNA sequence interval. Importantly, when employing either ssODNs or lssDNAs, random integration events were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Our studies demonstrate that Cas9-mediated HDR with pairs of ssODNs can generate conditional null alleles at many loci, but reveal inefficiencies when applied at scale. In contrast, lssDNAs are amenable to high-throughput production of conditional alleles when they can be employed. Regardless of the single-stranded donor utilized, it is essential to screen for sequence errors at sites of HDR and random insertion of donor sequences into the genome. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6011517/ /pubmed/29925370 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0 Text en © Heaney et al. 2018 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lanza, Denise G.
Gaspero, Angelina
Lorenzo, Isabel
Liao, Lan
Zheng, Ping
Wang, Ying
Deng, Yu
Cheng, Chonghui
Zhang, Chuansheng
Seavitt, John R.
DeMayo, Francesco J.
Xu, Jianming
Dickinson, Mary E.
Beaudet, Arthur L.
Heaney, Jason D.
Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
title Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
title_full Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
title_fullStr Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
title_short Comparative analysis of single-stranded DNA donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
title_sort comparative analysis of single-stranded dna donors to generate conditional null mouse alleles
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6011517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29925370
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-018-0529-0
work_keys_str_mv AT lanzadeniseg comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT gasperoangelina comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT lorenzoisabel comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT liaolan comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT zhengping comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT wangying comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT dengyu comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT chengchonghui comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT zhangchuansheng comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT seavittjohnr comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT demayofrancescoj comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT xujianming comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT dickinsonmarye comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT beaudetarthurl comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles
AT heaneyjasond comparativeanalysisofsinglestrandeddnadonorstogenerateconditionalnullmousealleles