Cargando…

Approach-aversion in calves following injections

We assessed aversion to injections using an avoidance-learning paradigm. Holstein calves (n = 24) were randomly assigned to one of four routes of administration for 0.5 ml of saline: intramuscular (IM), intranasal (IN), subcutaneous (SC) and a null control. Calves were first trained to approach a mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ede, Thomas, von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G., Weary, Daniel M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27669-7
_version_ 1783334017877147648
author Ede, Thomas
von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
Weary, Daniel M.
author_facet Ede, Thomas
von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
Weary, Daniel M.
author_sort Ede, Thomas
collection PubMed
description We assessed aversion to injections using an avoidance-learning paradigm. Holstein calves (n = 24) were randomly assigned to one of four routes of administration for 0.5 ml of saline: intramuscular (IM), intranasal (IN), subcutaneous (SC) and a null control. Calves were first trained to approach a milk reward of 1 L. Once the latency to approach the reward was consistent, calves received their assigned treatment when approaching the bottle. For the first 3 treatment sessions calves received a 1 L milk reward. This reward was then reduced to 500 mL, and then to 250 mL, and finally to 0 mL, each for 3 sessions. Compared to control calves, calves receiving the intramuscular injections showed a longer latency to approach the milk reward, but only when the milk reward was 0.25 L (P = 0.05) and 0 L (P < 0.01). Calves receiving the intranasal injections showed longer latencies relative to the controls only for the 0 L reward (P = 0.01). Calves receiving the subcutaneous injections did not differ from controls for any of the milk rewards (P > 0.2). We conclude that IM injections are aversive and that SC and IN routes are a refinement to be considered when feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6013468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-60134682018-06-27 Approach-aversion in calves following injections Ede, Thomas von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G. Weary, Daniel M. Sci Rep Article We assessed aversion to injections using an avoidance-learning paradigm. Holstein calves (n = 24) were randomly assigned to one of four routes of administration for 0.5 ml of saline: intramuscular (IM), intranasal (IN), subcutaneous (SC) and a null control. Calves were first trained to approach a milk reward of 1 L. Once the latency to approach the reward was consistent, calves received their assigned treatment when approaching the bottle. For the first 3 treatment sessions calves received a 1 L milk reward. This reward was then reduced to 500 mL, and then to 250 mL, and finally to 0 mL, each for 3 sessions. Compared to control calves, calves receiving the intramuscular injections showed a longer latency to approach the milk reward, but only when the milk reward was 0.25 L (P = 0.05) and 0 L (P < 0.01). Calves receiving the intranasal injections showed longer latencies relative to the controls only for the 0 L reward (P = 0.01). Calves receiving the subcutaneous injections did not differ from controls for any of the milk rewards (P > 0.2). We conclude that IM injections are aversive and that SC and IN routes are a refinement to be considered when feasible. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-21 /pmc/articles/PMC6013468/ /pubmed/29930261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27669-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Ede, Thomas
von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
Weary, Daniel M.
Approach-aversion in calves following injections
title Approach-aversion in calves following injections
title_full Approach-aversion in calves following injections
title_fullStr Approach-aversion in calves following injections
title_full_unstemmed Approach-aversion in calves following injections
title_short Approach-aversion in calves following injections
title_sort approach-aversion in calves following injections
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6013468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29930261
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27669-7
work_keys_str_mv AT edethomas approachaversionincalvesfollowinginjections
AT vonkeyserlingkmarinaag approachaversionincalvesfollowinginjections
AT wearydanielm approachaversionincalvesfollowinginjections